Sentences with phrase «reason is in question»

The seller should never give up his rights to control the release of deposits if the reason is in question.

Not exact matches

While there are good reasons to worry about combining kids and creative work in the modern world — kids are indeed expensive and bosses demonstrably discriminate against mothers - there's at least good news for creative moms when it comes to the last question.

This is a win / win question, explains Joanne Loberg, career coach at JL Careers in Vancouver, for reasons both straightforward and subtle.

The best comprehensive research that helped to answer the «reasons for success» question that I could find was from The Ecommerce Genome by Compass in their Startup Genome report, which looked at 650 internet startups.

Early this week, Lululemon Athletica found itself in the news for a very peculiar reason: a news outlet questioned if apparel maker's longest - serving board member was an actual person.

At the time, Business Insider reported that the closing of the fund could «raise a few eyebrows» in the so - called «Startup Nation» and lead to questions about the calibre of the young tech companies that are coming out of the country but it turns out that the move may have been motivated by different reasons.

Although the interest in and importance of AR technology is growing, there are a number of reasons to question whether this story is real or some kind of misdirecting plant.

There is reason to question Trudeau's execution, as his spending commitments have been slow to show up in calculations of gross domestic product.

The reasoning is that providing these services is costly, and nobody is more scrutinized in this area than their competitor Dropbox, who provides a more consumer - focused service, with a higher valuation many are questioning.

The Cambridge Analytica issue was the reason Zuckerberg was on Capitol Hill, answering questions for the second time in two days about how the group - which has counted U.S. President Donald Trump's election campaign among its clients - got hold of data on many millions of Facebook users.

«There's no reason why a robot like that couldn't cruise around at night and take inventory, so when you wake up in the morning, you don't ask that question,» Osborn says.

Part of the reason why these questions are on the table now can be traced back to a lawsuit brought by Verizon against the FCC that was settled in January of this year.

The reason these guys are interested in it is if they continually answer questions that are valid, people may want to come and hire them for their services.

I'm still pro entrepreneurship in everything I do, and it's the reason I started a Facebook group of now more than 10,000 other entrepreneurs (including the crowd favorite Noah Kagan) to chat, ask questions and learn from one another.

«I have no reason to disbelieve what she is saying,» Wasserman Schultz said in response to questions after she held a news conference on gun legislation...

While there's no question that our own discipline has been subject to the most reckless bout of Fed - induced speculation in history, we also have reason to believe that valuations are much closer to a two - sigma event than may be apparent.

While there is reason for some optimism on the issue of net neutrality with members of both the NDP and Liberals calling for action in this regard, the question remains whether the majority of Canadians are aware of the import of these issues on their daily lives or where the parties stand on them.

Remember, too, that the reason most tax preparers don't face interview questions is that the customer comes in around tax time with an immediate problem.

The Philidor sales transactions in Q4 2014, and the subsequent accounting treatment, was the result of a careful and reasoned accounting decision made by the Company's Corporate Controller based on what she considered to be complete and accurate facts, and I was told by the Corporate Controller that the outside auditors reviewed the transactions in question.

Moreover, your partnership with GGP - the reasons for which are not explained in your letter - is problematic and not only stockholder - unfriendly but also raises questions of legality.

Most of the reason for this is that the question of whether a thing is or is not a security is a highly fact - dependent and, sitting from my perch on the East Coast and not in the offices of the issuers of these coins, I am in a very bad position to ascertain what is going on behind a company's closed doors, what's in their private correspondence and what intentions lay behind their issuances.

These question and answers in the reports provide useful information to the users about the reasons behind the launch of the ICO, the vision of the platform launchers, information about the distribution of tokens, what problems the platform is designed to solve, and the benefits the platform offers to investors.

A bad apple will probably be swayed by a breeze and hit the ground faster, but the kind of «bad apple» in question who is practising as REALTOR in B.C., didn't seem to be concerned if they would even hit the ground — let alone how hard they might hit, and that's the problem Marty that seems to be above your level of reasoning.

But it's not terrible to start with the established winners and ask that question - the answer may in fact be, «nope, there's a reason these folks are the top choices.»

Thomas thinks that it is the discipline of metaphysics that asks questions about the ultimate cause of existence of things, and, as he says, «not only does faith hold that there is creation, reason also demonstrates it» (In II Sent., dist.

Had his peers refuted the premise of his question with a reasoned defense of the freedom of consensual adults to engage in physiologically dangerous sex - acts, then they would have been engaging in informative social influence through positive rational or rhetorical persuasion.

The questions is whether or not people are willing to see God as an old man in a robe with who creates essence out of nothing, or if people are willing to see God as the «creative» event that occured, a so - called actual essence of energy that was the over-all reason why we are here now.

I think the reason he dwells of God so much is because relgious people can't stop questioning him about it and he lives in a world where people seem to have to believe in God.

@Daniel I responded to your earlier questions in an earlier post which is was oddly awaiting moderation for some reason, perhaps because it has a link, I don't know, but it's up now if you go back.

But due to the situation he was in, he could have been killed for acknowloging that Jesus was the son of God.We should not sit here and question or reason with «knowledge» why Christ was cruxified the way he was or turned in.

Which leads me to the question of WHY DO YOU FOLLOW a being known ONLY by a book called the bible in which he drowns EVERY animal and CHILD on the planet for no reason.

perhaps the only way to answer either of these questions is if there indeed is an afterlife, which is a large part of the reason i continue to hope for and believe in god and life after death!

Additionally, if beliefs do not stand up to the rigors of scientific investigations and reason, then one would reasonably think that it is the beliefs that should be in question, and severely so, more than the science.

I have gotten rambling a little here but my question to you your thoughts on this statement: «If money or rather the established institution that is the world market, is the reason that throughout at leastthe past few decades, than it would be right to take from those who have much much more than they need and give to those who are at least the poorest of the world, those in need.»

If science can not answer a why question, it has been the case 100 % so far that nothing else has an answer either, and there's no reason to think this will change anytime soon in any foreseeable future.

Once the traditional one man, one woman union is open to question, then there is no reason for the government to continue to interfere in what has always been a social and religious tradition.

When I was a young teenage Christian, I one day expressed some doctrinal doubts to my pastor, who in no uncertain terms informed me that doubt was of Satan and that there was never any reason to question God's Word.

The reason I asked the question above is that I am quoting in a book that Tim Challies is ranked # 1 among Christian bloggers.

Furthermore, they seem happy to accept one unanswered question in return for being able to use God to answer any number of other questions, at least until better answers can be found through science and reason.

This is part of the reason Jesus asks the question in Luke 6:9 about saving a life or destroying it.

This view is, I hold, more or less pervasively affirmed, explicitly or implicitly, throughout the liberal tradition, so that its absence would provide good reason to doubt whether the theory in question is a part of that tradition.

Yes, and that was done for purely political reasons because the state in question did not want people looking to any higher power.

If my reading is correct (and I hope I am wrong), in that respect Barr has followed the overwhelming trend of Catholic commentators on the question of neo-Darwinian evolution, who gladly discuss its compatibility with the truths of faith but seldom bother to discuss whether and how it is compatible with the truths of reason.

In response to your question as to what my reasons were I have a very simple answer.

Rather because it excludes faith it also excludes philosophical reason, thereby deciding all ultimate questions in advance on the basis of a liberal philosophy of nature and reason so ubiquitous as to be invisible.

ttm, Belittling the question or the questioner and trying to shut them up is a form of spiritual abuse when it's done in a religious context or for supposedly religious reasons by someone in a position of authority.

«And to focus more precisely on the issue of «scientific evidence,» the sciences, ordered by their nature and method to an analysis of empirically verifiable objects and states of affairs within the universe, can not even in principle address questions regarding God, who is not a being in the world, but rather the reason why the finite realm exists at all.......

One major reason that institutions are inherently conservative is that continuing in existing ruts is far easier and less demanding than asking searching questions and allowing ourselves to be reshaped by the answers.

That every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason in the character of some actual entity whose objectification is one of the components entering into the particular instance in question (the ontological principle — or principle of extrinsic reference).

This is not the result of clumsiness or oversight; there is a reason for it, namely the truth - functional stance of modern logic: 1 (a) simply means that the individual named «A» does not satisfy the propositional function in question, i.e., 1 (x), or a true proposition does not emerge when that name is substituted in the argument position.