Someone tell me: Is this simply the vestige of another era or is there some good
reason law firm sites keep visitors in the dark about their non-legal staff?
Not exact matches
Here are just a few of the
reasons your
law firm needs to be active on social media
sites like Facebook:
One
law firm that specializes in divorce asserts that almost one in five petitions they process cite Facebook as a
reason, as spouses are finding evidence of flirting and even affairs on the
site.
Good points, Susan, and I've always told
law firms that I've worked in or with that RFPs should not be written by lawyers for the
reason you
site: For the most part, they are being read by non-lawyers.
There is no
reason law firms can't use https for their Web
sites.
Texas Bar, for innovative use of video and extensive online how - to library, Minnesota Bar for experimenting in blogs and social media (even if off the main
site), Mississippi for a terrific solo tool kit, Association of the Bar of New York for extensive resources (including a thorough business plan) on starting a
law firm, Colorado bar for unique programs like a conciliation panel that helps contentious opposing counsel get along, the DC Bar (for the very limited
reason that it has been offering free, monthly programs on starting a practice and NOT for its Avvo insantity) and the ABA for solosez and its attempt at social media with Legally Minded.
Many vendors — including providers of web
sites, online advertising sales, traditional advertising agencies and sellers of other «marketing» wares to
law firm customers — tout knowledge of the legal landscape as a
reason for buying from them.
LLP became the defacto choice for «
law firm websites», and these
sites were given a small edge for relevant searches within Google, then that would be a viable
reason to choose a.