Not exact matches
On this account, natural law is derivative from the right
of nature, in the sense that the former consists in
general precepts with which
reason counsels the pursuit
of self - preservation, and the social contract is based solely on those precepts.
The
reason for this flexibility
of method is not a desire to be «liberal» either in the sense
of an optimistic vision
of human
nature in
general or in the more restrictive methodological sense
of being optimistic about the power
of one's critical tools.
Certainly one
of the
reasons for the neglect
of both thinkers among English language philosophers has been that they have not played the role which Russell and Wittgenstein did in generating so - called analytical philosophy (a philosophical style inimical, upon the whole, to attempts to theorize about the
nature of the universe in
general.
For not only does it assign genuine value to
nature by incorporating the characteristics
of contingency, open - endedness, growth and decay in a
general metaphysic, but it also assigns an important place to
reason as a means for making explicit our understanding
of the
general structures which may be said to underlie the world as a whole.
And while it is true that such an approach does offer a more «down to earth» understanding
of the relation
of mind to
nature, here there is a seemingly equal tendency to assign too great a role to the place
of nature in the
general scheme
of things, resulting in the
general devaluation
of reason or mind.
Unlike Hegel and Nietzsche then (and the
general traditions which each may be seen to represent) Whitehead's
general account
of the relationship between mind and
nature not only acknowledges the role
of nature as a condition
of mind (as the
general theory
of evolution demands), but it also recognizes the place
of mind (or
reason) in
nature.
By approaching the question
of mind and
nature in this way Whitehead is able to provide us with an aesthetically rich understanding
of nature, which at the same time preserves a necessary role for
reason and the search for truth as an indispensable element in the determination
of conscious experience, the enhancement
of our aesthetic sensibilities, and the
general advancement
of civilization as such.
The positivist approach to
nature and
reason, the positivist world view in
general, is a most important dimension
of human knowledge and capacity that we may in no way dispense with.
A primary
reason, both in point
of time and significance, for the
general low estimate
of preaching is to be found in the
nature of American Christianity.
One can not argue from Jesus» resurrection to the immortality
of people in
general for two
reasons: first, because people in
general are not Jesus or even much like him — and there is strong presumption that Jesus»
nature had everything to do with his resurrection — and second, because Jesus was not immortal, according to the Christian message.
It has failed for two
reasons: because it has not taken seriously enough the demonic
nature of general television; and because it has proceeded on an inadequate understanding
of the
nature of the Christian gospel.
There is no
reason for us to reject the possibility that in a similar way the chaotic and monotonous episodes
of all experience, ours as well as
nature's in
general, may also contribute to the value
of the whole when viewed from a cosmic perspective (to which
of course we do not ourselves have access).
Hartshorne is convinced
of the capacity
of human
reason adequately to grasp the
general nature of reality, in its divine as well as non-divine forms.
There is a
reason that wartime
generals are horrible in peace time, their very
nature makes them unsuitable for the tranquility
of peace.
In spite
of these
general expectations, the identification
of individual genes causing reproductive isolation in
nature has remained elusive for at least three
reasons.
A deduction is the process
of reasoning from
general to specific, where conclusions are usually based on two or more assumptions, one
of which is
of a more
general nature.
If the undifferentiated and
general nature of the retention
of the data
of any person using electronic communications in the Union was one
of the main
reasons why Directive 2006 / 24 / EC was considered as going beyond what was strictly necessary (para. 59
of the DRI case), such data retention schemes are possible as long as they respect strict conditions (see the opinion
of AG Saugmandsgaard Øe on the joined cases Tele2 Sverige AB and Secretary
of State for the Home Department, commented on this blog).
One
of the
reasons against such chambers is that also so - called «specialized» cases may contain
general issues,
of transversal or horizontal
nature, and decisions on that should not be left to specialized chambers.
Next step will be maritime sector I suppose (see the
reasoning of the Judgment
of the Court (Grand Chamber)
of 21 December 2011 in Case C - 366 / 10 on the
general nature of the market based instruments that opens the way).
The trustee's
reasoning began that, as a matter
of general law, causes
of action vest in a trustee in bankruptcy upon appointment, unless the claims are
of an entirely personal
nature.
On your more
general point (realism
of court - room dramas) the most striking difference between TV and real life (from my single experience) was that the entire court process was far more geared around the jury than is (usually) depicted on TV: witnesses are directed to talk TO the jury (not to the barristers or judge); we were encouraged to indicate to the judge if at any time we were uncertain, or «uncomfortable» for any
reason (e.g. because
of the
nature of the evidence, or simply if we needed the toilet).
Because legal problems arise in particular factual contexts,
reasoning about the meaning
of a legal rule often requires more than the mechanical application
of the
general words in the text.3 Likewise, when an attorney
reasons by analogy, she considers the precise
nature of the particular legal problem and context and does not simply compare the surface details
of her client's case with a precedent.4
Lord Justice Wall gave another
reasoned judgment, to the same effect, adding that the very
nature of the pay schemes under attack in the Suffolk case (Agenda for Change) was such that it incorporated detailed procedures for complaints by individuals, meaning that the respondent was not likely to be wrong - footed by a grievance in
general terms; on that basis, it was doubly important that such claims should not be defeated on technical grounds.
Factors such as the broad
nature of the allegations, how widely they were spread, and the
reason the defamation was carried out, militated towards a significant
general damages award.
It is interesting to me that the basic
general release offered by the text is a release from: «any and all actions, causes
of action, suits, proceedings, [insert a host
of other things like debts etc.], and demands
of any
nature and kind whatsoever, and howsoever arising, whther in law or in equity or otherwise, whether express or implied and whether presently known or unknow, which the Releasor ever had, now has or may hereafter have against the Releasees, or any
of them, for, or by
reason of, or in any way arising our
of [blank].»
Beyond its rugged design, some
of the other
reasons OUKITEL suggests the OUKITEL WP5000 will suit these buyers is the
general lightweight
nature of the device and the long levels
of battery life on offer thanks to the inclusion
of a 5,200 mAh battery.
However, genetic studies by their very
nature are not representative
of the
general population because they either systematically or inadvertently exclude families who, for socioeconomic
reasons, can not or will not take part.