Sentences with phrase «reason taking money out»

There's a good reason taking money out of a 401k is tricky: that money is meant for retirement.

The general consensus to answering the question revolved around the blogger's admittance that the reason they took money out of their Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) before filing bankruptcy was because they were plain ignorant about bankruptcy laws.

Not exact matches

I believe there are a couple of reasons for this — business owners feel compelled to put everything back into their business, and they don't track how much money they actually take out of the business.

There are, very broadly, two reasons to bring money into China and two reasons to take it out, and we can define these as fundamental and speculative.

I say all holidays get banned on account of nobody celebrates them for anything more than a reason to argue, take your money, or skim out of work.

When I asked about women who where married or who were taking birth control for medial reasons she flipped out and started ranting about how liberals are turning us into a socialist country and there will be no money left for anyone in 10 years.

h... ers before game, crash cars, the owner also takes money out the arsenal for uknown reason.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

Iwobi is the best dribbler in our team, he takes players on, he opens of spaces, dude can play in very tight spaces, he brings balance to our team, he's physically strong, on numerous occasions he has used his massive frame to shade players and initiates attacks, the reason we brought aubu is solely bcos laca has bn disappointing, y should we play laca out of position just bcos he costs allot of money?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

Please take out from the list of reason to report «asking money upfront» what is wrong with that?

Lots of reasons — they want to take the easy way out, some don't care much about money, some trust Publishers, others don't want to believe Publishers would actually lie to them.

The second reason that I think student loan debt is at an all - time high is because some people take too much loan money out.

For that reason, you may want to consider taking out two or more loans for smaller amounts of money rather than one large loan.

Moreover, if for some reason the original recipient is fortunate to receive a full ride to school, the money can be taken out without penalties, but you may owe taxes.

A: The only reason the buy - and - hold portfolio goes to cash is to take money out of the portfolio to live on or put aside for an upcoming financial need.

Whatever your reason for taking out that money, the consequences are clear: A 2015 study by the Center for Retirement Research estimated that early withdrawals erode $ 69,000 from 401 (k) and $ 25,000 from IRA savings and earnings for the average American.

Out of all the reasons why you'd choose a hard money lender in Gilbert, simplicity and convenience take the stage.

More importantly, taking money out of a Roth runs counter to your reasons for building the retirement account in the first place, maximizing the tax benefits of your savings.

Remember, when you take money out at retirement there are a lot of reasons why you want to save your Roth money for last.

The reason is that you put this money into the Roth account likely at a lower tax bracket than when you take it out in retirement.

Once you turn 65, you can take money out of a health savings account for reasons outside of medical expenses, though those distributions will be subject to income taxes, Dietel said.

Do your best not to take any money out, but if you do, make sure it's for a qualified reason.

Additionally, you can take money out of an IRA without any early withdrawal penalties for specified reasons, some of which may become pertinent while you're unemployed.

In fact, the aspiration to earn more money was probably the reason you went to school (and took out student loans) to begin with.

Technically, you can take out your 401 (k) monies and spend the money for whatever reason, including paying creditors, as long as you meet the rules of the plan withdrawal.

I personally like to have less restrictions on retirement accounts but in some cases the restrictions will prevent people from taking the money out for silly reasons.

I would advise them not to take the money out for that reason and the one that Bill just pointed out.

Money you borrow against the equity in your home, or money you take out when you refinance your home for any reason except home improvement, is called «equity indebtedness.&rMoney you borrow against the equity in your home, or money you take out when you refinance your home for any reason except home improvement, is called «equity indebtedness.&rmoney you take out when you refinance your home for any reason except home improvement, is called «equity indebtedness.»

However, the only reason why I have money going into PTSA is so as to take full advantage of the employer's matching policy, though this matching policy is watered down by the higher annual mutual fund fees (stated as either 0.50 % or 0.75 %, but when performances compared against their respective market benchmarks, works out to be more like 2 % management fees).

Your Roth IRA can act as an emergency fund, since you can take out your contributions at any time and for any reason with no tax or penalty due (you already paid the tax before you put the money in).

There's no reason that tenant negligence should be taking money out of your pocket.

While you can easily counter that with — you brush your own teeth, take out your own garbage or pay your own bills, so why not invest your own money — there is an excellent reason: the consistent failure of professional money management in providing market beating returns to retail investors.

You will have to pay the money back, in most cases with interest, so you should be sure you're taking out the loan for the right reasons.

If you're going to borrow money at all, doing so for a house is a terrific reason to take out a loan.

This won't be a big deal if you just set up 1 NetSpend account and 1 Insight Card account and don't take money out of your existing savings account for any other reason.

You can always put more into the Roth IRA at a later time, but once you've got the money in there, you shouldn't take it out before retirement without a very, very good reason.

If for some reason you need to take money out, there is no 10 % penalty for early withdrawal.

This black - tie event raises money for the humane society and gives dog owners a reason to get all dolled up and take their pups out on the town.

@elda the reason 3D did not take off big was because people were to damn cheap or could not afforded the Tvs... So developers stop putting it in the games and saving the money but it did work really good, that's why I'm glad the PS VR is coming out.

The layers take advantage of bad situations by making money from them (my reasoning being that if it was out of the kindness of their heart they would limit their rewards to a reasonable compensation (by reasonable I mean 2, 3, or even 500 dollars per hour on cases not a % of a multimillion dollar reward which they are very assured of before they even take a case).

case, there is no out - of - pocket expense to the client and the initial hiring of the attorney is FREE; the attorney takes an industry standard percentage of the total amount of money recovered, and if for some reason no money is recovered, the lawyer makes nothing and the client has spent no money.

«For some reason, partners think it's taking money out of their pocket to invest in new systems,» Dolin said.

Data is collected and used in libraries for purposes like the evaluation of usage statistics of purchased content to assess whether value is being gotten for money, and as a way to evaluate whether a physical space is still required, but I would argue that the numbers of times someone accesses a subscription, asks a question at a reference desk, or takes out a book are not reasons to fund a library that are compelling to decision makers.

When a company is this old is usually a very good sign for two reasons, first, they are not out to take your money and close down shop.

Community college might be the most affordable college option, but that's no reason to take yourself out of the running for free money that you might qualify for.

Since that is the basic reason for taking out the insurance and the fact that this company will not cover in the event of illness, I would NEVER waste the extra money for this «protection»!

There's no reason that tenant negligence should be taking money out of your pocket.

If they suggest take all of the money out without a good reason, I would seriously consider whether that lawyer shares your desire for a civilized divorce.