Not exact matches
The mechanisms that should have prevented this
outcome have broken down, and as a result there's no longer much
reason to think Bitcoin can actually be better
than the existing financial system.
The first
reason is that withholding information from your mortgage application can constitute loan fraud, which is a far worse
outcome than not getting your home loan approved.
A man becomes an individual «I,» rather
than a peculiar mixture of universal forces or principles, only as he inwardly transcends both emotion and
reason, accepting responsibility for the
outcome of the struggle between them.
Here are 10
reasons why law is easier
than love: love means you have to trust the good in people love means you can't predict
outcomes love means you can't control people love means...
The Super Bowl is obviously unlike any other game for several different
reasons, but there's something that may alter the
outcome of the game more
than other factors — the halftime show.
• For these and other
reasons, although children in mother - stepfather families tend to experience better financial support
than children in lone mother households, and their stepfathers tend to be of higher «quality»
than their biological fathers in terms of education, employment, psychopathology etc. (McLanahan et al, 2006) their
outcomes and adjustment are not superior to children in lone mother households, although there may be cultural variations.
There are a variety of
reasons but one of the most important is the philosophy of «normal birth,» the self - serving idea promoted by midwives that the process of birth is somehow equally or more important
than the
outcome.
This kind of landmark judicial pronouncement is understandably rare in every jurisdiction not excluding the most advanced democracies for the obvious
reason that it has always been considered prudent for the preservation of the state, democracy and the peace to ensure that proactive mechanisms are put in place before, during and after voting day to deliver credible electoral
outcomes rather
than rely on costly post electoral judicial reviews.
For all of these
reasons, I believe that the percentage «satisfied» is a more direct measure of voting intention
than either the index or the trend, and hence the best predictor of the
outcome.
For this
reason, the study avoids a basic problem in comparing hospital
outcomes — that patients admitted to one hospital may be significantly less healthy, on average,
than the patients admitted to another.
For now, about all that researchers are certain of is that artificial light at night distorts our circadian rhythms and is associated with all sorts of bad health
outcomes, perhaps for no other
reason than that we're up and about, eating and drinking, at a time when we should be sleeping.
Antibodies included in the Human Protein Atlas have been analyzed without further efforts to optimize the procedure and therefore it can not be excluded that certain observed binding properties are due to technical rather
than biological
reasons and that further optimization could result in a different
outcome.
In this article, I'll share the top 5
reasons why
outcome - based learning is better
than design - first learning and 3 tips on how to successfully develop an
outcome - based learning strategy.
The
reason is that transformational leadership is more focused on the relationship between leaders and followers
than on the educational work of school leadership, and the quality of these relationships is not predictive of the quality of student
outcomes.
As a result, the disappointing
outcomes of retained students may well reflect the
reasons they were held back in the first place rather
than the consequences of being retained.»
In light of the frequency and
outcomes of the case law to date, the primary
reason effectuating these policies should be professional proactivity rather
than legal liability.
A spokesperson for the Independent Schools Council, which represents more
than 1,200 private schools, said citing money as the
reason for higher educational
outcomes was «over simplistic».
Critics of charter schools have often pointed to those schools» ability to expel uncooperative and disruptive students, far more readily
than regular public schools can, as a
reason for some charter schools» far better educational
outcomes, as shown on many tests.
The
outcome was obviously a chaotic mess in many ways, but in my opinion, it happened for precisely the OPPOSITE
reason than you are suggesting: RT was trying to be MORE inclusive, not less so.
It stands to
reason that those who believe they have control over the future of their business are more likely to take action to get their desired
outcome, rather
than leave it to chance.
There are many
reasons to attempt mediation rather
than to file a lawsuit, including lower costs, quicker and better resolution, and improved, more practical
outcomes for the animals involved.
Sadly, because the method of selecting start and end points has the appearance of being deliberately selected by CMS to find the figures that most confirmed the prior
reasoning,
than any valid method — we've had this discussion here at CE, years ago, when Girma was pulling the same stunts — it is of course going to be the
outcome that valid methods find this flaw in the endpoints CMS proposed.
But if the framework or its essence is retained under future governments, then we have every
reason to expect that the
outcome may be better
than projected by the government.
Despite his memorable description of the worst possible
outcome of the Anthropocene as being «a Frankenstein planet stitched together by geological resurrection men» (p258), Morton's sympathies seem to lie closer to the Promethean scientists who seek to manage an unavoidable (and potentially even «good») Anthropocene,
than with more precautionary scientists and environmentalists who use the term as a warning — a
reason for humanity to pull back from scientifically identified «planetary boundaries» and lessen our interference.
This
reasoning is mirrored in the cognitive laboratory, where people's responses are also often informed by the consequences associated with competing paths of action (the data are quite complex but it seems safe to conclude that most people are sensitive to weighting the
outcomes of competing actions rather
than being exclusively entrenched in immutable moral rules).
This is the
reason why having conditional and unconditional offers is more likely to lead to a cooperative
outcome than unconditional offers.
The
reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse
than a median
outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.
There are five main
reasons why: (1) Latin is inconsistent with the Plain - English Movement in American law; (2) Latin tends to obscure rather
than clarify prose, even if your reader has legal training; (3) Lawyers often use Latin as a substitute for lucid expression of complex thoughts, or merely to impress the reader; (4) Latin can result in comic legal - writing blunders; and (5) Latin can lead to dangerous, sometimes
outcome - determinative ambiguities.
The system can also handle hypothetical
reasoning (eg, multiple parallel possibilities) as well as assigning probabilities to
outcomes rather
than rigid certainty to evaluate more complex decisions (fuzzy logic).
I don't know whether the criticism counts as ironic, insofar as I see some of the adoring praise for some of his recent decisions as having more to do with their values and
outcomes than the actual «
reasons.»
The
reason for that is they have no incentive to spend any more lawyer time on something
than is justified to reach the best
outcome, and every incentive to reach that
outcome as efficiently and expeditiously as possible.
Even if one accepts that the failure to ask for
reasons is a circumstance that supports the remedy of ordering
reasons rather
than quashing the order, the seriousness of the
outcome to Mr. Brar, being the cancellation of his taxicab driver's licence and the loss of his livelihood, militates in favour of not giving too much weight, if any, to that failure.
Without an evaluation of the relative effects — which is more complicated
than simple intuition suggests, especially since one can always pay cash — there is no
reason to say that either of these would be a better
outcome.
Some families appear to cope more easily
than others do, but there are compelling
reasons to suggest that effective interventions may improve family coping and ultimately
outcomes.
While some families appear to cope more easily
than others, there are compelling
reasons to suggest that effective interventions may improve
outcomes for parents and their families.
The change of focus from consideration of the legal framework of native title to consideration of the economic and social development
outcomes that may be generated through the native title system is a natural progression in our work for
reasons other
than political utility.
The unfortunate
outcome of the focus on the research of these individuals is that policymakers and practitioners are being given further
reason to view achievement gaps as the cognitive problems of individuals rather
than the result of failures in the structures of our schools and societal policies.
There are several
reasons for this: (a) therapist - led, moderately intensive treatments provide more impressive
outcomes when compared to wait - list controls
than minimally intensive interventions.
One of the
reasons for negative child - rearing
outcomes in divorced homes in which there is something other
than sole authority in the custodial parent, e.g. the variety of joint custody «solutions,» is precisely that at every turn, the authority of the head of the children's household IS in fact undermined.
The first
reason is that withholding information from your mortgage application can constitute loan fraud, which is a far worse
outcome than not getting your home loan approved.