The view is that once the situation is explained adequately, that reasonable people will be forced to draw the same
reasonable conclusions as concluded by the consensus of the scientific community.
By 2025 it may be possible to evaluate the accuracies of all the model predictions for 2012 — 2025, and reach
a reasonable conclusion as to which model (s) might most be relied upon for planning the subsequent 75 years.
Not exact matches
The combination of low levels of ES funds and the cash rate remaining close to its target suggests a couple of
conclusions: first, the market players involved with RTGS have adapted well to operating in the new environment; and second, participants have
reasonable confidence about the availability of cash near the interest rate announced by the Reserve Bank
as its policy target.
They may identify themselves
as a certain faith, but a
reasonable amount of logical thought will lead to the same
conclusion: no religion is correct and there is no way to prove anything.
Suddenly the frustratingly «
reasonable» and uncertain style is driven to
conclusions by a commanding philosophical intellect exploring topics
as complex
as the nature of causation.
May I say it was a perfectly
reasonable, logical and very intelligent
conclusion to draw but
as we today know totally wrong.
Another observation I have made
as a result of the discussion that would ensue is that those who herald themselves
as «
reasonable» and «logical» tend to draw many unwarranted
conclusions.
In either field, our position must rest on faith in God, but in conjunction also with the most
reasonable conclusions we can draw from such knowledge
as we have.
First, I think your exposition of Lord Hope's reasoning is spot on, and insofar
as your questions /
conclusions about the Climate protesters follow from that, they are
reasonable.
«It is not clear beyond a
reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have reached the same
conclusion if properly instructed,
as is required by the law for the verdict to stand,» Jose Cabranes of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision said in his decision.
In Thursday's ruling, the appellate court ruled the judge's erroneous instruction to the jury at Silver's trial «was not harmless because it is not clear beyond a
reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have reached the same
conclusion if properly instructed,
as is required by law for the verdict to stand.»
Because both parties will come to an
reasonable agreement that they have made, which would give both of the parties an advantage in their own territory so they can be happy with the
conclusion that they have made and surely they will be happy with the pact that they agreed on, and the result in this will be that they will live in a much more better environment
as well
as a much more peaceful world for both them, their children
as well
as for all of mankind.
Harvard University evolutionary biologist Daniel Lieberman, who was not involved in the study, called it a «creative analysis» and saw the team's
conclusions as reasonable.
Isn't it
reasonable to begin studying humans,
as Maratsos does, with the
conclusion that people are «basically a disappointment»?
But in a world in which, according to Vermij, the Tychonic system was regarded
as a serious rival of the Copernican system, Marius's
conclusions seem
reasonable.
Hi Mike, I assume from your name that you're vegan, so the good news is that if we accept the principle that ectopic fat stores are the underlying cause of the disease, and if we look to the results (i.e. those on low fat vegan diets with unrestricted carbohydrate intake are able to reduce or even eliminate insulin dosage) it follows
as a
reasonable conclusion that ectopic fat stores are in fact being reduced by such a diet.
Stevens is brilliant
as this Eddie Haskell - cum - Terminator (he even emerges naked from steam at one point, like the T - 800), ingratiating himself into an entirely
reasonable scenario and only occasionally, in the beginning, demonstrating that little tiny bit of psychopathology that points to the picture's
conclusion.
They are, by far, the best objective benchmarks available for use by buy - and - hold fundamentalists
as tools essential, most of the time, for reaching
reasonable conclusions about what economic reality might be.
Timothy Chase (171): Of course, the response to your
reasonable conclusion is usually (
as expressed to me by one of the leading practitioners of the Chewbacca defense) is that scientists are engaged in «groupthink.»
Science isn't about belief, it's about evidence (observational & experimental) and
reasonable conclusions;
as long
as a teacher sticks to an objective curriculum based on science I would be supportive.
The Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, for instance, has sometimes made
conclusions based upon the «balance of the evidence» The ideological climate skeptics, (to be distinguished from
reasonable skepticism) often publicizes what is not known about these issues and ignores what is known and at the same time has accused those who have identified plausible but unproven risks
as doing «bad science.»
If you are
reasonable and base
conclusions on actual data, you should acknowledge that conditions are not changing
as quickly
as once feared.
Maybe there is a valid reason for you to advocate because of your concern about a lack of balance, but: (1), I question the criteria you are using to measure that imbalance, and (2)
as you become an advocate, you drift away from the science, and you drift away from the first order priority of presenting
as much information
as is
reasonable, objectively, before laying out the argument for your
conclusions.
When we put these developments against the harsh warnings of an organization
as conservative
as the World Bank — that «we're on track for a 4 °C warmer world marked by extreme heat - waves, declining global food stocks, loss of ecosystems and biodiversity, and life - threatening sea level rise» — the only
reasonable conclusion is that the world has gone mad.
Will's talking point «they were predicting an ice age in the 1970s» might have been
reasonable back in 1992, considered
as a suggestion that we should not jump to
conclusions on the basis of limited evidence and analysis.
As we shall see, that high - emitting nations have responsibility for funding adaptation measures in developing countries is a conclusion that can be based on strong ethical grounds despite reasonable disagreements about such matters as when the ethical responsibility was triggered, which kinds of adaptation measures should be funded now, and the need to distinguish between responsibilities that arise due to the «fault» of high - emitting countries and responsibilities which arise without attributing «fault.&raqu
As we shall see, that high - emitting nations have responsibility for funding adaptation measures in developing countries is a
conclusion that can be based on strong ethical grounds despite
reasonable disagreements about such matters
as when the ethical responsibility was triggered, which kinds of adaptation measures should be funded now, and the need to distinguish between responsibilities that arise due to the «fault» of high - emitting countries and responsibilities which arise without attributing «fault.&raqu
as when the ethical responsibility was triggered, which kinds of adaptation measures should be funded now, and the need to distinguish between responsibilities that arise due to the «fault» of high - emitting countries and responsibilities which arise without attributing «fault.»
If it is considered
as a
reasonable approximation of the condensation dynamics then all
conclusions follow.
I don't believe that those who performed these model runs claimed that this evidence was the same
as proof, but it is
reasonable to consider it evidence nonetheless, and to suggest that if the results had come out in the reverse direction, it would have been evidence for a different
conclusion.
Taken together, these two papers (and several similar ones, at least) should convince anyone that «A fundamental and societally relevant
conclusion from these studies is that the use of the IPCC model predictions
as a basis for policy making is» a valid and
reasonable approach.
If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used
as the latest red herring distraction in the global warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records» in a too limited time span without relevant context, which, just in case some may not have noticed does not represent the region known
as planet Earth, uses too short a time span in relation to mechanism outside of the examined region because it is in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a
reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a red herring distraction in the argument between science and science denialism regarding global warming.
It found that the Appellant had not identified any basis upon which it could be said that the judge misapprehended the evidence, and accepted
as reasonable the chambers judge's
conclusion that the absence of recent occurrences of disruptive behaviour was due to the injunction itself.
There was ample evidence to support his
conclusion, in applying the objective test, that the appellant,
as a
reasonable patient in his position, would have chosen the medical procedure which had such unfortunate consequences.
In reaching this
conclusion, the Committee looks to two factors: (1) whether the law firm, by merely publishing contact information on its website that includes an e-mail address, creates a
reasonable belief that the law firm is specifically inviting or soliciting the communication of confidential information; and (2) whether it is
reasonable for the person providing the information to expect that it will be maintained
as confidential.
The Court of Appeal's contrary
conclusion rested,
as suggested above, on an approach that incorporated the s. 241 oppression remedy with its emphasis on
reasonable expectations into the s. 192 arrangement approval process.
The employer may reach this
conclusion either because the matter does not involve a course of vexatious comment or conduct
as defined (for example the matter seems to be a personality conflict) or because the complaint appears to be about
reasonable action taken to manage and direct workers — conduct specifically excluded from the definition of «workplace harassment».
The Tribunal looked at the procedure
as a whole and reached the
conclusion that the decision to dismiss was both procedurally and substantively fair and fell within the band of
reasonable responses.
In light of that
conclusion, it was not necessary for the Agency to consider whether alternative measures proposed by the respondents would be
reasonable (such
as a 50 % discount on certain fares or ad hoc accommodation).
Still, when the difference is over the something
as basic
as whether the
conclusion is both
reasonable and logical — implying that (at least for these judges) there's a difference, I'd like to know what they think the difference is in principal, and in the particular case.
«Having considered the decisions, the writings and the various aspects of the public interest which claim attention, I have come to the
conclusion that the court should state the relevant principle
as follows: a document which was produced or brought into existence either with the dominant purpose of its author, or of the person or authority under whose direction, whether particular or general, it was produced or brought into existence, of using it or its contents in order to obtain legal advice or to conduct or aid in the conduct of litigation, at the time of its production in
reasonable prospect, should be privileged and excluded from inspection.»
The Court of Appeal rejected this submission
as it saw no distinction between a risk of exposure and a risk of harm, and
as long
as the evidence supported the judge's findings (which it did), he had reached an entirely
reasonable conclusion that avoidable exposure in the school had made a material contribution to the risk and therefore to the eventual materialisation of the claimant's illness.
My «
Conclusion» states: «To argue persuasively that a law society in Canada should be the single regulator of all providers of legal services requires that, that law society solve the problem
as to legal services not being available to the population at
reasonable cost.
[140] My
conclusion that the evidence in this case raises a
reasonable doubt is not the same
as deciding in any positive way that these events never happened.
On that basis, it was
reasonable for the Appeals Officer to come to the
conclusion that the Employer did not exercise control over the workplace and,
as such, could not effectively carry out an inspection and accomplish the underlying purpose of paragraph 125 (1)(z. 12) of the Code.
On the issue of financial circumstances, I am advised that the jury award,
as I have earlier said, will be effectively cancelled if the defendant obtains a costs order from the date of the offer to the
conclusion of trial... It is
reasonable for me to conclude that (the plaintiff) has significant disbursements from prosecuting her claim.
As these successor ministers were and now are responsible for the duties exercised by the Solicitor General and that of the MSGA, the only
reasonable conclusion is they are or were, in substance, the Solicitor General, for the purposes of s. 254 (1) of the Code.
Accordingly, the Committee concludes that lawyers have a
reasonable expectation of privacy when communicating by e-mail maintained by an OSP, a
conclusion that also has been reached by at least one case
as well
as state bar ethics committees and commentators.35
The judge concluded that the only
reasonable conclusion that could have been reached based on a proper analysis of the evidence that should have been admitted was that the engineer had always maintained that he was not an employee, but was self - employed
as an independent contractor.
As a legal matter, Judge Landis (the commissioner and a former federal judge himself) could draw his own conclusions from this evidence; he wasn't bound to reach the same conclusion as the jury, particularly since a ban from baseball does not require proof beyond a reasonable doub
As a legal matter, Judge Landis (the commissioner and a former federal judge himself) could draw his own
conclusions from this evidence; he wasn't bound to reach the same
conclusion as the jury, particularly since a ban from baseball does not require proof beyond a reasonable doub
as the jury, particularly since a ban from baseball does not require proof beyond a
reasonable doubt.
The
conclusion was «a law firm may use a system that allows its lawyers to access the firm's document system remotely,
as long
as it takes
reasonable steps to ensure that confidentiality of information is maintained.»
It properly treated the statutory objectives
as guiding principles in the exercise of its rate ‑ setting authority, and came to a
reasonable conclusion.