We aim to be a platform for
reasonable discussion and debate.
Not exact matches
HOLLOWAY»S
REASONABLE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Dear Father Editor With regards to your September 2006 editorial («The Catholic Vision of Matter: Towards a New Synthesis»)
and the
discussion arising out of it (recent Letters pages), it seems to me that a more fruitful frame of reference for the
debate might be Thomas» epistemology.
So I decided the right way to drive change in the climate
debate is not to rant about it but instead to continue to model what I consider good behavior — fact - based
discussion and a recognition that
reasonable people can disagree without that disagreement implying one or the other has evil intentions or is mean - spirited.