Sentences with phrase «reasonable driver»

That crazy traffic can be reduced to a series of actions of and reactions by reasonable drivers facing specific conditions.

The Court of Appeal noted municipalities have a duty to prevent or remedy road conditions that create an unreasonable risk of harm for ordinary drivers exercising reasonable care — «In other words, a municipality's standard of care is measured by the «ordinary reasonable driver.»

Grip is a given in any modern Audi product, but the latest S3 hugs the road beyond reasonable driver fault.

Ordinary reasonable drivers are not perfect drivers; they make mistakes» (at para. 28); Deering v. Scugog, 2010 ONSC 5502, at para. 154; affirmed 2012 ONCA 386.

You can also prove negligence by showing a reasonable driver would have been more careful.

This means that a reasonable driver would keep their eyes on the road in order to prevent collisions with pedestrians and other vehicles.

If the at - fault driver failed to drive as a reasonable driver would have under the circumstances, then he or she should be deemed negligent.

We will have to prove that the other driver did not use the same level of care and skill that a reasonable driver would have used.

Was it [reaching for a water bottle] a marked departure from what a reasonable driver would have done?

Examples of conduct expected of a reasonable driver include stopping at a red light, watching for pedestrians, and following the vehicle ahead at a safe distance.

[14] I am prepared to accept that Ms. Snyder's original estimate of four seconds was in error but, in my opinion, the cyclist was there to be seen in time for a reasonable driver to have stopped prior to the collision.

Municipalities should consider the circumstances and determine if the condition of the road poses an unreasonable risk of harm to reasonable drivers.

That driver probably wasn't as careful as a reasonable driver should be — in other words, he was negligent — and may be liable for your injuries.

Acting like a reasonable driver includes monitoring your driving speed, noticing construction signs, having working order brakes, etc..

The overriding question remains: in all of the circumstances, does the condition of the road pose an unreasonable risk of harm to reasonable drivers?

Since drunk driving is illegal, a prudent and reasonable driver would refrain from getting behind the wheel after drinking too much.

The undisputed evidence is that the road Fordham was driving on posed no hazard to a driver who stopped at the stop sign, or even to one who slowed to 50 km per hour at the intersection... Does the condition of the road pose an unreasonable risk of harm to reasonable drivers?

Since no reasonable driver would ever allow him or herself to be distracted while driving, any evidence that a driver was distracted can provide the basis for a negligence case.

The Court of Appeal held the road «offset posed no hazard, no risk at all to the reasonable driver — the ordinary driver exercising reasonable care» (at para. 36).