Considerations relevant in determining whether
a reasonable opportunity has been given include the following:
Not exact matches
The addition of Sharlto Copley as a mercenary turned advocate of progression for third world countries
gives the proceedings good
opportunities to toy with expectations of the audience (keep in mind that none of the swerves
are anything mind - blowing, but logically
reasonable shifts that propel momentum forward and shake the plot up), but again, his arc (along with everyone else's including Harold's) could
have been better realized).
If the vouchers
were set at a
reasonable level, entrepreneurs
would be willing to open new schools, not only
giving children the
opportunity to leave the public schools but also providing schools at which to spend the voucher.
Frequent formative assessments mirror the final unit exam (or project, or performance, or portfolio, or demonstration, or...) Mr. Jones
has developed in collaboration with his colleagues, and students
are given reasonable opportunities within a
reasonable timeline to redo, correct, or retake assessments.
Under Ofqual's proposal, exam boards
would be required to collect a formal statement from schools, confirming pupils
had been given «
reasonable opportunities» to complete the non-exam assessment task and that 20 hours
had been set aside for it.
Witnesses will
give the cops a ring from the nearest phone if they see you commit a crime nearby — which can lead to some silly antics as you gun down one witness which causes another one to attempt the call and so on and so on until the game arbitrarily decides the whole thing
has gone on long enough — but there
's a
reasonable length of time before the coppers will show up, providing plenty of
opportunity to simply drive away or duck into an alley.
In this time, you will
be given a
reasonable understanding of the events of the first two games that
have led up to this point, as well as
being given the
opportunity to make many of the integral decisions in the story so far.
In a voir dire proceeding the accused alleged a breach of his rights under Sections 7, 8 and 10 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and specifically that he
was not
given a
reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to counsel and that the accused
was not provided with a full range of resources and access to sources of information which reasonably
were or ought
have been made available to him to contact a lawyer, including internet access.
Rule 13 (3) prohibits an inquiry panel from including any «explicit or significant» criticism of a person in the report or any interim report unless that person
has been sent a warning letter, and
given a
reasonable opportunity to respond.
In this case, the police officer's legal opinions constituted an inducement that render the statement involuntary for the following reasons: i) the legal advice provided by the police officer
was central to the issues that the accused ought to consider in assessing whether or not to provide an inculpatory statement; and ii) the accused
had stated he wished to seek the advice of Counsel before providing a statement; and iii) the accused did not expressly waive his rights or indicate that he
had changed his mind about consulting Counsel before providing a statement; and iv) no
reasonable opportunity was given for the accused to consider his options; and
v) it can
be reasonably argued all subsequent statements
were influenced by the police officer's legal advice.
[19] Ms. Brake
was not
given any clear and
reasonable opportunity to correct the alleged issues that the Defendant
was having with her employment performance.
The court considered those comments and concluded that a
reasonable person
would conclude that the mediator / arbitrator
had made up his mind about the behaviour of the mother (which she disputed), and that by refusing to grant a short delay for the hearing he
had failed to
give her a
reasonable opportunity to
be heard.
In particular, the accused says that he
was not
given a
reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to counsel and that the accused
was not provided with a full range of resources and access to sources of information which reasonably
were or ought
have been made available to him to contact a lawyer, including internet access...
The trial judge
had found that, instead of telling the plaintiff what
was expected of him and
giving him a
reasonable opportunity to respond to the criticisms against him, the responsible Xerox manager became «more authoritarian, impatient and intolerant» and «subsequently acted impulsively and without justification.»
However, if the Ex-partner
has not retrieved the items despite
being given such
reasonable opportunity to do so, then they can
be disposed of in a
reasonable manner — or better yet, donated to a charity (with the donation receipts retained; they can
be used for Canada Revenue Agency purposes.)
«Responsible journalism,» as the Lords called their new defence, posited that if a journalist
has taken
reasonable steps to verify that a story
is true, and
has given the subject an
opportunity to respond, he or she can not
be found liable for defamation, even if the story contains untruths.
Lord Cooke stated that, applying the concepts of reasonableness between neighbours and
reasonable foreseeability, a defendant,
having been given notice of the nuisance and the
opportunity to abate it, might fairly
be expected to bear the cost of reasonably necessary remedial works, and the party on whom the cost fell may recover it, even though there may
be elements of hitherto unsatisfied pre-proprietorship damage or «protection for the future», provided there
is no double recovery.
A covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to an order in the course of a judicial or administrative proceeding if
reasonable efforts
have been made to
give the individual, who
is the subject of the protected health information, notice of and an
opportunity to object to the disclosure or to secure a qualified protective order.
As part of the process, they will
be given an
opportunity to argue that you don't
have the right that you think you do and, even if you do, what they
are doing doesn't infringe it or
is reasonable in the circumstances.
Alexander established that the test of sufficiency of information
is a general, not a mechanistic, one, namely whether or not the employee
has been given sufficient to
give him a
reasonable opportunity to consider his response.
29 If, on the application of any person, a justice
is satisfied that a person
has habitually, persistently and without
reasonable cause commenced vexatious proceedings in the court, the justice may, after hearing that person or
giving that person an
opportunity to
be heard, order that proceedings must not
be brought or commenced in the court without leave of a justice.
At first blush, it
would be reasonable to think that
being «open»
would give you more
opportunities to consider, not less.
The Agreement defines what the parties think
would be fair and
reasonable — it
gives them the
opportunity to decide for themselves what will happen to marital property upon the death of either spouse or divorce.
In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must
give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or
has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the
opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of
vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony
has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for
reasonable periods to the spouse
having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.
In Brown v. Wheeler, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed the trial court judgment holding in favor of defendant because plaintiff failed to allege or show that: (1) landlord
had actual knowledge or reason to know of the presence of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint and that such condition
was hazardous, and (2) landlord
was given reasonable opportunity to correct hazard.
The court affirmed the trial court judgment holding in favor of defendant because plaintiff failed to allege or show that: (1) landlord
had actual knowledge or reason to know of the presence of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint and that such condition
was hazardous, and (2) landlord
was given reasonable opportunity to correct hazard.
The Court stated that «in a lead paint poisoning claim based on negligence, a plaintiff must identify admissible evidence that, if believed,
would prove that the landlord (1)
had actual knowledge or reason to know of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint on the premises and that such a condition
was hazardous, and (2) the landlord
was given a
reasonable opportunity to correct the hazard.»