Sentences with phrase «reasonable people consider»

At first blush, the doctrine of judicial notice is simple: courts will not require proof of facts that reasonable people consider to be indisputable or which «everybody knows.»

The actual time spent discussing anything that looks like what reasonable people consider «ethics in journalism» continues to approach zero.

He cited Mr Justice Wilkie in Sanders v Kingston [2005] EWHC 1145 (Admin), [2005] All ER (D) 12 (Jun) in connection with the term «with respect»: «That is a concept, particularly when it describes the conduct of an official to others, which is perfectly capable of being applied by a reasonable person considering a course of conduct so as to enable that person to know what they are doing, or about to do, would or would not comply with the Code in that way.»

The inquiry is contextual: the reasonable person considers the judge's impugned conduct, comments, or extrajudicial activities in light of the entire trial.

Not exact matches

Not only is it impossible to anticipate in such a code every possible variable or potential dilemma, but always «it is possible to satisfy the letter of the law while still committing an act that most reasonable people would consider unethical or immoral.»

It also has you consider the needs of the other person, so you can both come to a reasonable conclusion.

Usually, the shoes were about $ 1,000 to $ 2,000, but when you considered that she made upwards of 20 % of that person's salary for the first year, suddenly those extravagant shoes seem downright reasonable.

The financials are realistic numbers, therefore setting reasonable expectations (hopefully) for people who might consider trying or benchmarking.

If this is a sensible view of what we believe non-loving and non-rational people contribute to our children's experiences, it should be a reasonable beginning for considering what they would contribute to God.

One way of responding to this line of thought has been to offer arguments for the existence of God based on what is considered evidence acceptable to any reasonable person.

I think people would see trading him as reasonable if they're considering a rebuild.

Lots of people consider, with good reason, that this woman's «activism» is not only silly and founded on ignorance and misinformation, but an attempt to shame other mothers who make perfectly reasonable choices about how to feed their children.

If that people would be driven by constructive, positive, caring emotions and reasonable (even if opinion based) grounds, - even if caring for themselves, which I consider acceptable -, there would be still problems left, but the problems could be handled in respect for each other and with a friendly attitude.

«But because of more stringent laws at a time when society was different, courts overcharged people and maximized their sentences beyond what is considered reasonable by a civilized society.»

(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so;

«The [refugees] board may withdraw the recognition of where the board considers that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person who has been recognized as refugee should not have been given the status.»

I consider that if funding is sufficient we have a 50/50 chance of developing technology within about 25 to 30 years from now that will, under reasonable assumptions about the rate of subsequent improvements in that technology, allow us to stop people from dying of aging at any age — equivalent to the effect of today's antiretrovirals against HIV.

Mechanical valves are recommended in persons younger than 50 years of age, biologic valves in persons older than 70 years of age, and either type is considered reasonable for persons 50 to 70 years of age.

Five dollars may seem ridiculous, but with homemade stock, inexpensive rice, and if you used one or two slices of regular bacon instead of pancetta (I also got my pancetta pre-cut at Trader Joe's), the price per person evens out to be reasonable considering this is a main dish.

Considering it encourages a person to consume large amounts of vegetables, lesser amounts of fruit, good quality meat that should be grass - fed (ruminants) or free range (poultry, together with their eggs), and a reasonable amount of healthy oils and nuts.

I have some friends / acquaintances who work at Uber, who are pretty reasonable people, but I wonder whether they consider the bad surrounding press.

Her concern is that any reasonable person receiving a 1099 in the mail for the forgiven debt will just resentfully pay taxes on it, not knowing that they might be considered insolvent and should instead file form 982.

That, combined with its reasonable rates and good customer service, make it a good choice for people seriously considering debt relief.

In a legal context, and in any dispute that you might have with a retailer or company over standards of service, it means the level of service must be one that you or any other normal reasonable person would also consider to be reasonable.

All things considered, the 1.07 % MER is reasonable for people who want to index without becoming a do - it - yourself investor.

But insisting that dogs, cats, gorillas, elephants, reptiles and birds all have strategies for coping with grief seems relatively reasonable when you consider the lengths some people go to for their pets...

* Training / Behavior Modification hasn't resulted in an acceptable change in the dog; * There is significant risk and / or evidence that dog is going to seriously injure someone; aggression problems don't automatically mean the dog will injure someone or is dangerous; I am referring to the idea that even with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another animal or a person; * The dog is so dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work with.

I have to roll my eyes at the thought that «any reasonable person» would consider the surgical removal of reproductive organs as the sole option for preventing unwanted litters.

Intimidation under this section is defined as what a reasonable, prudent person under same or similar circumstances would consider intimidation and whether that person would have felt intimidated by the actions of the animal in question;

A Real Mistake is a fault on the Site (for example, in terms of price) which no reasonable person would consider appropriate or to make business sense.

(A) Comes within all of the following descriptions: (i) A reasonable person, considering the game as a whole, would find appeals to a deviant or morbid interest of minors.

No reasonable person would consider the CO2 as independent bifurcation parameter since the CO2 is continously produced and consumed in large quantities within the «climate - generating» system depending upon interplay of other variables.

What is considered «reasonable cost» to one person may be unreasonable to another, and may include factors other than money.

I don't consider $ 500 for a smart phone reasonable, but many people do, so they voluntarily spend their money to buy one.

I think you mischaracterize people who consider the hockey stick a reasonable reconstruction (with limits and uncertainties like all reconstructions) by thinking that implies that MWP and LIA are phantoms.

I consider myself a reasonable person and that just doesn't fit into the science I know.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

perhaps you might consider the possibility that when a large number of people with a reasonable level of competence examine a bad bit of science they can all identify the faults.

You (and he) may find that «cool» but most reasonable people would just consider it kooky.

Which I don't think any reasonable person would consider an explanation.

So I decided the right way to drive change in the climate debate is not to rant about it but instead to continue to model what I consider good behavior — fact - based discussion and a recognition that reasonable people can disagree without that disagreement implying one or the other has evil intentions or is mean - spirited.

Generally speaking, the ECtHR considers that to assess the existence of a reasonable suspicion, it is necessary to check «whether there are factual indications for suspecting that person of planning, committing or having committed criminal acts or other acts that may give rise to secret surveillance measures, such as, for example, acts endangering national security» (para. 260 of the case Zakharov v. Russia).

The question is whether the evidence presented by the party challenging the judgment convinces the reviewing court that a reasonable person would conclude that the judge did not perform her sworn duty to review and consider the evidence with an open mind: Teskey.

The question is whether the evidence presented by the party challenging the judgment convinces the reviewing court that a reasonable person would conclude that the judge did not perform her sworn duty to review and consider the evidence with an open mind.

I've heard some reasonable - sounding people suggest that one of the reasons Trump may not be officially designated as a «target» is because the DoJ is of the opinion that they can not indict a sitting president, so formally speaking he can not be considered a putative defendant (and can never be a «target» as a result).

A recent Court of Appeal decision (Griffiths v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions) has held that employers should consider making reasonable adjustments to their sickness absence procedures if they put disabled people at a disadvantage.

Direct notification must be given to an affected individual in person, by telephone, mail, email or any other form of communication that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances.

The correct approach was to consider the reaction to the injury of a reasonable person in the objective circumstances of the claimant.

In deciding whether the People have proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt, you must impartially compare and consider all the evidence that was received throughout the entire trial.

Unreasonable testamentary behaviour of the deceased may be considered, but English law, the court confirmed, recognizes the freedom of individuals to dispose of their assets by will in whatever manner they wish, subject to the statutory requirement to make reasonable financial provision for a limited class of persons.