I actually think there are
reasonable people on both sides of the same - sex marriage debate.
Once again,
reasonable people on both sides are going to have one hell of a mess to clean up when this is over.
@Saluki — I have never heard
a reasonable person on either side of this debate declare that all charters are great, or that we should move to an all charter system.
Not exact matches
There are plenty of
people on boths
sides of this conversation that are
reasonable and understanding.
Throw in a collection of model results that are hard to interpret, and it is quite
reasonable to understand why
people (
on both
sides) are confused.
What that means is I've found
people who are
reasonable on the «alarmist»
side in the past, but I'm not seeing them around here anymore.
Reasonable people can disagree and, ultimately, can come down
on different
sides of the question of whether solar geoengineering could — or should — play a role in an overall climate policy portfolio.
It envisions a vast «American middle,» obscured by the din of partisans
on both
sides, filled with undecided, uncommitted, but fundamentally
reasonable people who are just waiting to be spoken to in a «grown - up» way.
However there has been a tradition
on both
sides of politics of appointing
reasonable people to head agencies.
Here's the example that I use: is it
reasonable to require
people reading a client file
on a laptop to install a device that prevents the screen from being viewed from the
side?
As is also true with other forms of social media, each judge who uses Twitter must err
on the
side of caution and be aware that posts a judge - user considers neutral may nonetheless lead a
reasonable person to question the judge's impartiality.
I thought of similar cases —
people fighting for custody not to get custody but to bargain the children for a better property settlement; filing for custody when the other parent asks for an increase in child support; refusing
reasonable settlement to run up fees for the other party when you have rich parents to pay
on your
side; and most commonly, hostility created between
people by aggressive lawyers.