Sentences with phrase «reasonable person the belief»

Not exact matches

Under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act (Unlawful obtaining etc. of personal data), a criminal offense has not been committed if a person has acted in the reasonable belief that he had in law the right to obtain data.

Let's teach kids that primitive people still cling to ancient folklore, but that those beliefs are no more reasonable than believing the Easter Bunny lays colored eggs.

But the claim with which Keister begins her study» that a person's religious beliefs will exert some influence on whether he will pursue material wealth and how he will go about doing so» seems eminently reasonable.

@response you said: «You might actually try real, honest dialogue about faith and belief instead of just railing off extremes and trying to cover it by saying all atheists are rational, reasonable people.

If we assume, as I think is reasonable, that the vast majority of these belief systems are the creations of sincere people striving to understand their god or gods, why do they have nothing in common?

We are on the CNN Belief Blog... it is quite logical and reasonable to expect people to talk about God, sin and faith.

I think my point was missed and you zeroed in on one person listed where there is reasonable doubt regarding his beliefs.

You know logically it is reasonable to find people who hold belief in God here.

And it is logical and reasonable to see people make such claims on a Belief Blog.

Thoughtful and reasonable peoples must rebut any group espousing destructive cult beliefs.

Religious people answer the same meta question by expressing the presence of belief in their mind, which is an equally reasonable answer of course.

============== @No Truth, Just Claims «Reasonable people don't endorse ANY state sponsered belief, no matter if it is theistic OR atheistic.»

The sheer number of different god beliefs without any way of verifying their stance as «the Truth» should cause any reasonable person to be skeptical..

So those who are posting and saying they belong to Christian organizations and volunteer to help others REALLY are better people than all the smugly «reasonable» posters whose venomous diatribes against having any religious belief make them sound like a logically mirrored reflection of a religious extremist.

So too, this model makes thoughtful people who have perfectly reasonable doubts feel guilty and rewards people who either lack the concern or the intellectual curiosity to question their beliefs by making them feel like they have «strong» faith.

In the U.S. people have the right to display their religious beliefs in a reasonable manner and there are hundreds of court decisions supporting thins.

Most people choose to send their children to a school to be educated, but contrary to popular belief it is both legal and reasonable to educate your child at home.

All reasonable people will agree that there is scope in a secular democracy for reasonable accommodation of religious beliefs when that accommodation does not affect the rights and freedoms of others.

If you're raising an eyebrow at that, you're probably reasonable to do so; but my long - held belief is that indexes (the implicit comparison most people will have made to my target figure) are grounding and self - justifying benchmarks.

(See, for example, Utah's House Bill 210, sponsored by Republican Curtis Oda, which proposed to relax «provisions of the Utah Criminal Code relating to animal cruelty and animal torture,» in order to allow, among other things, «the humane shooting or killing of an animal if the person doing the shooting or killing has a reasonable belief that the animal is a feral animal.»)

Last week, Colbert took Utah Representative (and Buddhist) Curtis Oda (R) to task for his sponsorship of HB 210, which «amends provisions of the Utah Criminal Code relating to animal cruelty and animal torture,» including allowances for «the humane shooting or killing of an animal if the person doing the shooting or killing has a reasonable belief that the animal is a feral animal.»

Does anyone think a person can participate in a reasonable discussion and hold this belief?

To challenge the warrant under the Cloud Act, Microsoft would need a reasonable belief that its customer is not a U.S. citizen and that there is a material risk that producing the email would violate Irish law, according to a statement emailed to the ABA Journal by a press person for Craig Newman, head of the data privacy practice at Patterson Belknap.

Although Pill LJ acknowledged that Art 8 (2) permits interferences with that right in the interests of national security or public safety, he did not believe that it required the insertion of the words «that the power may be exercised as long as a constable has reasonable belief in the arrested person's occupation or control».

Section 6 (1) of the MVDA states that an applicant (salesperson and / or dealer) that meets the prescribed requirements is entitled to registration or renewal of registration by the registrar unless, (a) the applicant is not a corporation and, (ii) the past conduct of the applicant or of an interested person in respect of the applicant affords reasonable grounds for belief that the applicant will not carry on business in accordance with law and with integrity and honesty, or (ii) the applicant or an employee or agent of the applicant makes a false statement or provides a false statement in an application for registration or for renewal of registration.

Therefore the prior charges failed to alert the person charged to the importance of a young person's age in relation to sexual behaviour, and so could not justify depriving that person, if later charged with a sexual offence against an older child of the reasonable belief defence.

In reaching this conclusion, the Committee looks to two factors: (1) whether the law firm, by merely publishing contact information on its website that includes an e-mail address, creates a reasonable belief that the law firm is specifically inviting or soliciting the communication of confidential information; and (2) whether it is reasonable for the person providing the information to expect that it will be maintained as confidential.

In that case, is it acceptable under s. 8 to lower the burden on the police in getting judicial authorization, to «suspicion» rather than «reasonable grounds» for belief that information or evidence is available at the place or from the person with respect to which / whom the warrant is sought?

There were of course exceptions but that explained why a person who honestly believed that he was in danger of an imminent deadly attack and responded violently in order to protect himself from that attack should be able to plead self - defence as an answer to a criminal charge of assault, or indeed murder, whether or not he had been mistaken in his belief and whether or not his mistake had been, objectively speaking, a reasonable one for him to have made.

For example, «that there's no real reasonable religious entitlement to only be educated in the company of people who share your religious beliefs, and that sort of objective wouldn't outweigh the equality entitlement of LGBTQ people to have access to legal practice.

In some cases, if a person has a reasonable belief that their spouse is going to withdraw most or all of the monies in the joint bank account, then taking half of the money out of the joint bank account to keep separately in an individual account and leaving the other half for the spouse may be the best option in that scenario.

-- see: Foley, [2000] O.J. No 5204 (S.C.J.): a belief in the need for retaliation may be mistaken but reasonable, and, «a person defending against an attack reasonably apprehended can not be expected to weigh to a nicety the exact measure of defensive action required.»

In the case of the latter, there is a reasonable accommodation (do not require all people to eat cheeseburgers; or, if the simple existence of cheeseburgers in the same room is contrary to belief, put them in another room).

However, that did not mean that a reasonable belief that the victim was 16 or over could not be a mitigating factor for a person over the age of 18 but the older the offender the less relevant a mistake as to age, even if reasonably held, would be.

(iii) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by this subpart, provided the individual or person has a good faith belief that the practice opposed is unlawful, and the manner of the opposition is reasonable and does not involve a disclosure of protected health information in violation of this subpart.

The provision permits covered entities to refuse to treat a personal representative as the individual, generally, if the covered entity has a reasonable belief that the individual has been or will be subjected to domestic violence, abuse or neglect by the personal representative, or that treating the personal representative as the individual may endanger the individual and, in its professional judgment, the covered entity decides that it is not in the best interest of the individual to treat such person as the personal representative.

Comment: Several comments addressed the portion of proposed § 164.510 (k) that would have provided a presumption of reasonable belief to covered entities that disclosed protected health information pursuant to this provision, when such disclosures were made in good faith, based on credible representation by a person with apparent knowledge or authority.

Covered entities have the opportunity to decide not to treat a person as a personal representative when the covered entity has a reasonable belief that an individual has been subjected to domestic violence, abuse, or neglect by such person or that treating such person as a personal representative could endanger the individual.

The NPRM stated that covered entities that made disclosures in these circumstances were presumed to have acted under a reasonable belief if the disclosure was made in good faith, based on credible representation by a person with apparent knowledge or authority.

Again, though, this is not as simple as just arguing that the accused really did believe it — rather, the law requires evidence that the accused person's belief was reasonable and that they took real steps to make sure the complainant was consenting.

Diversity and inclusiveness... are faddish and jargonistic concepts and have never been considered obligatory to the beliefs of reasonable people, until the recent triumph of political correctness.

If a couple of thugs try to drag a person away, then an observer probably has a reasonable belief that this is an unlawful battery.

But the law is right not to make people change because their belief requires reasonable accommodation by others.

A person who does or omits to do an act under an honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the existence of any state of things is not criminally responsible for the act or omission to any greater extent than if the real state of things had been such as he believed to exist.

The whistleblower sections of the Competition Act (s. 66.1 and 66.2) protect the identities of people who report competition law offences to the bureau and prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who, in good faith and on reasonable belief, report potential competition law offences.

Under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act (Unlawful obtaining etc. of personal data), a criminal offense has not been committed if a person has acted in the reasonable belief that he had in law the right to obtain data.

San Francisco, CA About Blog Catholic is a place to present new developments in the world of Catholicism, discuss theological teachings of the Catholic Church, provide an avenue for reasonable dialogue amongst people of all beliefs, and grow in our own spirituality.