It's
a reasonable point viewed in isolation, that we may overestimate how technology improves lives over the baseline condition when it just solves problems we anticipate.
Not exact matches
I didn't get to make the
point I really wanted to make — that most early - stage VCs now
view IPOs as a bonus, but not a
reasonable plan — but hopefully was mildly coherent (here are my more detailed thoughts):
So, while it may seems kinda» silly from «our»
points of
view, when I look at it from the RCC's
point of
view, it seems quite clear and
reasonable, given some of their goals and outcomes (IMHO).
These secularist will give you
point after
point that supports their
view that religions are militant and discriminative... I believe that
reasonable people can see that the worlds religions, at their base, give a practical means for living ones life.
From a practical
point of
view, I think that most people refer to people by how they self - identify, when it is
reasonable to do so.
In the light of that claim, it is
reasonable to attribute the New Testament's use of the phrase «the Jews» to the
point of
view of an era when the church was in conflict with the Jewish community, hence to conclude that the anti-Semitism in the New Testament is incidental.
From another
point of
view they would seem to be a key motivation behind the unprofessional nature of the frenzied accusations, amidst what, in its foundations at least, was
reasonable reporting about real Church failures.
It is a
reasonable point of
view, that comments should be made in a decent language.
If all one is interested in is perusing a range of
points of
view, whether backed up by valid science or not, it's a
reasonable source.
While our sympathy remains with Abner since the film takes his perspective, we can also appreciate the Choat family
point of
view, their lease being on the level and their resistance to an unfriendly, non-paying boarder most
reasonable.
Limiting state testing to 3.6 days per school year per child seems
reasonable both from a burden
point of
view and because the technical quality of assessments from that much time can be excellent.
I would recommend this book, not just to Kingsolver fans, but to anyone who wants to read a
reasonable point of
view.
Every student should know how to express their personal
points of
view and support them with
reasonable arguments.
While writing an essay, you should strive to convince the reader that your
point of
view is a
reasonable one.
The academic essay, as well as any other paper, should prove of your
point of
view beyond the
reasonable doubt.
Your
points of
view raised in admission essay should be supported by
reasonable arguments.
It makes it more bearable and it's a fairly
reasonable point of
view... but:
You should be
reasonable and not only look at the situation from your
point of
view but also from the creditor's
point of
view.
Economies, art and otherwise, are of course worlds different now, and the
point that Doig's work (like any contemporary artist's) has not had the kind of critical assessment afforded by the long
view is a
reasonable one.
No matter HOW
reasonable the terms «ritual» and «ceremonial» and «temple» SOUND to us as laymen, please be aware that there were many very practical people living in those old societies — carpenters, farmers, metal workers, bricklayers, architects, etc. — and the archaeological
view that the societies were run predominantly by priest castes is only one
point of
view.
My
point was that with such divergent world
views compromise isn't a
reasonable expectation anymore and sooner or later things are going to get ugly.
Honest contrarians who expect
reasonable outsiders to give their contrarian
view more than normal credence should
point to strong outside indicators that correlate enough with contrarians tending more to be right.
So, looking at this from the
point of
view of actual temperature, it starts to look a lot more
reasonable.
Several commenters
pointed me to an interesting blog, Real Climate, which seemed to be a
reasonable treatment of issues written by those who generally accept the orthodox
view of man - made global warming.
I believe that the general rule should be that if the viewpoint is not inherently abusive, and if the poster is not attempting to antagonize under cover of a legitimate post (trolling), and if it is an arguably
reasonable point of
view, and if the site is one that purports to allow all viewpoints, then it should not be prohibited on the grounds that it is extremely at odds with the
view held by many at that site.
Persuasion to the Real Climate
point of
view is possible only if those who write there, and here, remember that people are suspicious when
reasonable questions about disputed science are met by an extraordinary exhibition of affronted pique and wounded amour - propre such as the one above.
... A spouse who controls the business and chooses to leave the money in the business must be prepared to explain why his or her decision is
reasonable from a business
point of
view.
From other
point of
view, if we accept that without
reasonable doubt means 100 %, we can not literally prove anything.
The Court started its analysis by reciting previous case - law that the German authorities could not agree to the construction of the power - plant until they have ascertained that «there is no
reasonable doubt from a scientific
point of
view as to the absence of -LSB-...] adverse effects to the integrity of the site.»
While this may seem like a
reasonable explanation from your perspective, try looking at this wording from your client's
point of
view.
We would like to invite you and your client to meet with us to discuss an alternative means to resolve this matter in a way that is fair to our clients and respects the mandate of yours... We are of the opinion that,
viewed objectively, the state of the evidence to this
point demonstrates that this prosecution has no
reasonable prospect of success... You have no evidence to respond to our experts and, it seems to us, no
reasonable basis to expect they will be disbelieved... We think you will agree that an objective review of Mr. Marschdorf's evidence exposes serious weaknesses in the prosecution case and significant areas of agreement between the defence and your only witness... You are dependent on a theory advanced by Mr. Osborne which misconceives the law.
When judges hit the target anyplace, the sentence is
reasonable from the appellate
point of
view.
My first thought: predictive coding should be one screening tool — but like artificial intelligence, it is «artificial» — at some
point, there are subtle issues that even humans
view differently — don't
reasonable people disagree?
General Standard 2 of the IBA Guideline states that an arbitrator shall decline to accept an appointment or refuse to continue to act where facts or circumstances exist, or have arisen since the appointment that, from a
reasonable third person's
point of
view the facts or circumstances give rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator's impartiality or independence.
But from the
point of
view of the majority of the union's experienced bargaining team, having regard to everything that had occurred to that
point, including almost a month out on strike, these changes represented a
reasonable outcome, all things considered.
It is useful to quote key observations by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my
view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay evidence, the requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no
reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors
pointing against the admission of the hearsay evidence... The means by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my
view diminish the weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.
Conditions do, of course, apply, but they're very
reasonable from my
point of
view.
Even if the first bid has a
reasonable price and timeline and comes from a contractor with a good track record, it's important to get another
point of
view or two.