Sentences with phrase «reasonable specificity»

(i) Describes with reasonable specificity the covered entities, or class of entities, to which the joint notice applies;
(ii) Describes with reasonable specificity the service delivery sites, or classes of service delivery sites, to which the joint notice applies; and
The joint consent must identify with reasonable specificity the covered entities, or class of covered entities, to which the joint consent applies and must otherwise meet the consent requirements.
... there is a higher duty on a party requesting documents under... Rule 7 - 1 (11)... they must satisfy either the party being demanded or the court... with an explanation «with reasonable specificity that indicates the reason why such additional documents or classes of documents should be disclosed...»
The question is: do the documents in dispute, ie, MSP and Pharmanet, come withing the terms of either Rule 7 - 1 (1)(a), ie, documents that can be used by a party of record to prove or disprove a material fact or that will be referred to at trial or, if not, do they come under category 7 - 1 (11), generally, in the vernacular, referred to as the Guano documents... There is no question that there is a higher duty on a party requesting documents under the second category... that in addition to requesting, they must explain and satisfy either the party being demanded or the court, if an order is sought, with an explanation «with reasonable specificity that indicates the reason why such additional documents or classes of documents should be disclosed», and again, there is no doubt that the new Rules have limited the obligation for production in the first instance to the first category that I have described and has reduced or lessened the obligation for production in general...
The problem, of course, is that we don't understand all the internal and external drivers to any reasonable specificity to make those kinds of claims — asserted human impacts are unscientifically divined by creating fudge factors that make models fit, without actually * knowing * how realistic those models are (or more to the point, * knowing * how unrealistic those models are.

Not exact matches

Response: We considered ways in which we might increase specificity, including defining «to the extent practicable» and «reasonable steps» and relating the mitigating action to the deleterious impact.
Similarly, an unsubstantiated comparison of the lawyer's services or fees with the services or fees of other lawyers may be misleading if presented with such specificity as would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the comparison can be substantiated.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z