Sentences with phrase «reasonably prudent person»

which would cause a reasonably prudent person to seek medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment within 2 years prior to your effective date of coverage

This includes but is not limited to any medical condition, sickness, injury, illness, disease, mental illness or mental nervous disorder for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or treatment was recommended or received or for which a reasonably prudent person would have sought treatment during the 180 days before the effective date.

A Pre-Existing Condition is defined as, «Any (1) condition for which medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment (includes receiving services and supplies, consultations, diagnostic tests or prescription medicines) was recommended or received... immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date; (2) condition that had manifested itself in such a manner that would have caused a reasonably prudent person to seek medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment (includes receiving services and supplies, consultations, diagnostic tests or prescription medicines)... immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date; (3) injury, illness, sickness, disease, or other physical, medical, mental, or nervous conditions, disorder or ailment (whether known or unknown) that, with reasonable medical certainty, existed at the time of application or... immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date.»

This includes but is not limited to any medical condition, sickness, injury, illness, disease, mental illness or mental nervous disorder, for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or treatment was recommended or received or for which a reasonably prudent person would have sought treatment during the 36 * months before the effective date.

Any (1) condition for which medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment (includes receiving services and supplies, consultations, diagnostic tests or prescription medicines) was recommended or received during the 18 months immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date; (2) condition that had manifested itself in such a manner that would have caused a reasonably prudent person to seek medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment (includes receiving services and supplies, consultations, diagnostic tests or prescription medicines) within the 18 months immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date; (3) injury, illness, sickness, disease, or other physical, medical, mental, or nervous conditions, disorder or ailment (whether known or unknown) that, with reasonable medical certainty, existed at the time of application or within the 18 months immediately preceding the Certificate Effective Date.

This specifically includes but is not limited to any medical condition, Sickness, Injury, Illness, disease, Mental Illness or Mental Nervous Disorder, for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or Treatment was recommended or received or for which a reasonably prudent person would have sought Treatment during the 36 month period immediately preceding the Effective Date of Coverage under this Certificate.

Also, if your condition would have caused a reasonably prudent person to seek diagnosis or treatment in the past five years, that would be considered a pre-existing condition, even if it was not treated or diagnosed before the effective date of the gap medical insurance.

This specifically includes but is not limited to any medical condition, Sickness, Injury, Illness, Disease, Mental Illness or Mental Nervous Disorder, for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or treatment was recommended or received or for which a reasonably prudent person would have sought treatment during the one hundred and eighty (180) days (three hundred and sixty five (365) days for Insured Persons 70 and older) immediately preceding the effective date of coverage under this Certificate.

This specifically includes but is not limited to any medical condition, sickness, Injury, Illness, disease, Mental Illness or Mental Nervous Disorder, for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or Treatment was recommended or received or for which a reasonably prudent person would have sought Treatment during the 36 month period immediately preceding the Effective Date of Coverage under this Certificate.

i) occurred outside the Insured Person's Home Country suddenly, Unexpectedly, and spontaneously, and without: (1) advance warning, (2) advance Treatment, diagnosis or recommendation for Treatment by a Physician, or (3) prior manifestation of symptoms or conditions which would have caused a reasonably prudent person to seek medical attention prior to the onset of the Emergency; and

the culprit acts or omissions which led to the failure to provide necessaries of life were a marked departure from the conduct of a reasonably prudent person in similar circumstances, and it was objectively foreseeable that the failure to provide necessaries would lead to a risk of danger to the life or permanent endangerment to the health of the person to whom the duty is owed.

the culprit acts or omissions which led to the failure to provide necessaries of life were a marked departure from the conduct of a reasonably prudent person in similar circumstances, and

A person acts negligently if he or she fails to behave in a way that a reasonably prudent person would have in a similar situation.

(b) exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

10 The focus of the open and obvious defense is not whether the defect itself (e.g. failure to warn, design defect, etc.) was obvious, but whether the hazard or risk which ultimately caused the injury was clearly apparent.11 A hazard or risk is open and obvious, «if the person using the product is or should be aware of the risk» 12 but, proceeds to act in a manner where a reasonably prudent person could or should have anticipated the resulting accident.13

Negligence refers to the failure of an individual to behave how a reasonably prudent person would have acted under similar circumstances.

Negligence is a civil wrong where a party fails to act as a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances.

A reasonably prudent person without medical training would have realized that Ezekiel needed medical attention;

such force and means as a reasonably prudent person would use under the same or similar conditions as they appeared to the person, taking into consideration all of the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time of [and prior to] the incident.

Subsection 122 (1) of the Canada Business Corporations Act requires that directors and officers of a corporation, in discharging their duties, shall act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation, while exercising the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

Negligence may arise from doing something that a reasonably prudent person would not do or, on the other hand, from not doing something that a reasonably prudent person would have done under the circumstances.

Negligence may arise from doing something that a reasonably prudent person would not do or, on the other hand, from not doing something that a reasonably prudent person would...

In other words, medical malpractice takes place when a person or entity causes a patient harm by deviating from the level of care that a reasonably prudent person or entity would have used in the same or a similar situation.

Much of a negligence case revolves around assessing whether the defendant's actions were reasonable and whether a reasonably prudent person would have acted differently.

    (e) Necessary and reasonable veterinary care including vaccinations that are required or recommended by a licensed veterinarian, and care and treatment a reasonably prudent person would find appropriate or necessary for injuries, neglect, illness or disease with records of such care and treatment that are available for inspection at all times.

Not exact matches

And a prudent person can reasonably doubt those sayings which so precisely fit the needs of Jesus» early followers, which do not fit with the rest of his message.

«Furthermore, a substantial elevation in PM2.5 may also serve as a nudge that reminds or alerts people to avoid areas and activities where other people may share an infection with them, to not touch their face with dirty hands, to be vigilant about washing their hands when reasonably possible or prudent, and to engage in other preventive behaviors that are known to reduce infection risk.»

A reasonably prudent and ordinary person would have foreseen that failing to provide medical attention would endanger Ezekiel's life; and

Negligence is the lack of ordinary care; that is, the absence of the kind of care a reasonably prudent and careful person would exercise in similar circumstances.

In the Stephan case, people will disagree on the verdict based on their own concept of parenting and strongly held beliefs but, accepting that the jury was properly instructed on the law, the finding of guilt would be based on a finding that in all of the circumstances, objectively viewed, the Stephans» conduct was a marked departure from that of the reasonably prudent parent.

«Negligence:... the failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances...» (Black's Law Dictionary)