Sentences with phrase «reasoned explanation»
A "reasoned explanation" is a clear and logical explanation that is based on facts, evidence, and thoughtful thinking. It means explaining and supporting your ideas or decisions with sensible reasons. Full definition
But there's a good reason explanation for what's going on here.
kotaku.com
What I hope for on these blogs is carefully reasoned explanations of the science.
You listen to anyone who has played CB or coached defenders and they will give a coherent and reasoned explanation as to how CB chemistry as a pair is nearly always more important than individual attributes.
It is reassuring to read a blog with reasoned explanations for many of the positions it believes.
And that's if Johnson's personal reasons explanation holds up.
One more reasoned explanation for this trend is that bigger cities are made up of a slightly younger demographic.
Furthermore, she argued that the judge could not properly have concluded that any negligence had actually caused or contributed to the injuries and the judge's finding on causation had been expressed in bald terms: there was no proper reasoned explanation and the «but for» test had not been satisfied.
Each case would have a well - reasoned explanation behind the award.
Agents especially do not like you asking them for a fully detailed critique of your work or for a fully detailed and reasoned explanation of why they rejected you.
Federal agencies that depart from its recommendations may be vulnerable to legal challenge if they do not provide a clear and reasoned explanation for their decisions, he said.
«The agency seems to be lacking both a reasoned explanation and any source of authority for failing to undertake notice and comment for the purpose of changing the rule's deadline.»
The proposed repeal then raises FCC v. Fox to explain that a «reasoned explanation» for a new regulation can be based on only policy changes and «need not be based upon a change of facts or circumstances.»
He noted that while Fox says a «reasoned explanation» is required, it also says agencies must have a «good reason.»
Legal experts who have reviewed the proposed repeal differ on whether it would constitute a «reasoned explanation» under Fox, and thus whether it could withstand a legal challenge if unchanged.
In FCC v. Fox Television Stations, the high court ruled, 5 - 4, that an agency can change regulations without the move being considered arbitrary or capricious under the Administrative Procedures Act as long as it provides a «reasoned explanation» for the change.
While stakeholders may debate whether or not a regulatory change is «a good course of action» or a reasonable one, «those are not the inquiries available to a judge questioning whether or not it is a reasoned explanation.»
And by argument I do not mean having a dispute, I mean laying out a reasoned explanation.
But on Thursday, Harvard University President Drew Gilpin Faust released a long and reasoned explanation of why the school will not remove fossil fuel investments from its portfolio.
Acting sua sponte and providing no reasoned explanation, the three judges dismissed Judge Scheindlin from presiding over the stop and frisk cases altogether, summarily concluding that she had «compromised» the «appearance of [im] partiality» surrounding the litigation.