Sentences with phrase «reasoned opinion on the matter»

If the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties, it shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations.

If the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under this Treaty, it shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations.

a: one who expresses a reasoned opinion on any matter especially involving a judgment of its value, truth, righteousness, beauty, or technique

Not exact matches

Of course, both professional and lay Christians have opinions on these matters, but it is rare that these opinions are explicitly and clearly grounded in a reasoned Christian faith.

«It is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics [of cosmology]... If [non-Christians] find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason?

Now it is understandable in my opinion to think that perhaps Wenger's reasoning is that Lucas may not entirely be ready to take the Premier League by storm, given that player do need time to adapt, however the subs used in the Chelsea game changed my perspective on the matter.

But you gave your reasons for your opinion on the matter, and I respect that.

It's a matter of opinion as to whether or not you agree with him on these points, but those are his stated, official reasons.

On the decision to listen to Ghanaians and accommodate various shades of opinion on national matters, President Akufo - Addo stated that «it is for this reason that I invited my three predecessors to seek their views on certain governance and developmental related issueOn the decision to listen to Ghanaians and accommodate various shades of opinion on national matters, President Akufo - Addo stated that «it is for this reason that I invited my three predecessors to seek their views on certain governance and developmental related issueon national matters, President Akufo - Addo stated that «it is for this reason that I invited my three predecessors to seek their views on certain governance and developmental related issueon certain governance and developmental related issues.

Although one might expect opinion on the matter to be divided along conventional left - right grounds, experience has shown this not to be the case - although the vulnerability of Labour on the issue of top - up fees may have encouraged some to adopt particular stances for political - tactical reasons, rather than on grounds of principle.

I have severe social anxiety, I'm too afraid to talk to the opposite sex or to start any type of conversation with anyone new because of multiple reasons - fear of rejection, fear of people thinking I'm stupid or my opinion doesn't matter (which your whole post basically insinuates,» just put on some mascara and look pretty, no one cares for your opinion»), fear of doing or saying the wrong thing.

I don't have an opinion either way on this matter, as I'm fairly sure there is a bit of corporate asshatness on both sides, but to say Jay's reasoning is flawed in the same paragraph as suggesting that publishers don't care about readers is illogical to an extraordinary degree.

I mean more for when this hopefully gets a western release, because for a very strange reason this seems so cool despite me not having much history with the dark souls series, I would love to hear your opinion on the matter!

This should give everyone who has a strong opinion on the matter reason to go back and re-visit the evidence and to consider opposing viewpoints.

And personally, I have no reason to believe your opinion on this matter.

For the reasons given by the Court of Appeal, we are all of the opinion that the exclusion from the insurance policy based on art. 2402 of the Civil Code of Québec may not be set up against the heirs of the insured, as that article must, even in light of s. 34 (1) of the federal Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I - 21, be interpreted having regard to the principles of interpretation that apply in the area of insurance law so as to favour the precision and certainty of the grounds for exclusion in such matters.

It would also include experts retained by a non-party to the litigation (for example, statutory accident benefits («SABS») insurers), who form opinions based on personal observations or examinations relating to the subject matter of the litigation for a purpose other than the litigation (referred to in these reasons as «non-party experts»).

If, however, the court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a «matter of first impression»), and legislative statutes are either silent or ambiguous on the question, judges have the authority and duty to resolve the issue (one party or the other has to win, and on disagreements of law, judges make that decision).5 The court states an opinion that gives reasons for the decision, and those reasons agglomerate with past decisions as precedent to bind future judges and litigants.

I do not advocate ignoring validity issues in these opinions, but no matter how well reasoned they are they will not mitigate against indirect infringement unless you actually succeed on the invalidity arguments at trial.

Counsel tend not to stand on the steps of the court to make televised announcements to the public — so for that reason and to get «counsel's opinion» on the matter I am talking to John Cooper QC who led the legal team before the chief justice Lord Judge.

The Opinion reasons that the inquiry therefore turns on whether the inquirer was acting in her «judicial capacity», whether the proposed representation is part of the same «matter», and whether the inquirer's involvement as a judge involved the «merits.»