Sentences with phrase «reasoned public case»

There is the alternative that, to his credit, has been attempted by Governor Cuomo, namely, to make a reasoned public case for the compatibility of his moral convictions and his political position on abortion.

Not exact matches

For Uber, there were many reasons to settle the case, particularly as Khosrowshahi expects to take the company public in 2019.

The reason tax mix matters is because it explains the Nordic countries, who have much larger public sectors than does Canada, so much so that according to the usual Fraser Institute logic that lower taxes overall would lead to faster economic growth, they ought to be complete basket cases.

The one and only reason it dragged out was due to the hawks foolishly blocking further needed public stimulus (public stimulus, which has been absolutely proven to work when applied during a deflationary recession and when private debt is too high already, which was the case when the little and only stimulus was applied).

There are no doubt many significant reasons as to why this is the case but one aspect which needs to be considered is the extent to which some lobbying groups have advanced their views to influence thinking in public life.

Although the debate over marriage is a clear and current case in point, the dearth of reason is endemic to the public debates of our time.

Where positivist reason dominates the field to the exclusion of all else - and that is broadly the case in our public mindset - then the classical sources of knowledge for ethics and law are excluded.

Keller particularly came to public attention for his breakthrough book The Reason for God (Hodder & Stoughton), which provided an accessible case for Christianity at a time when Richard Dawkins and his fellow atheists were riding high in the best - seller charts.

The reasons are (1) to avoid damaging public confidence in the political impartiality of the monarch, and (2) to ensure that there is always a functioning government, in case of a national emergency.

In many cases there is simply no alternative for businesses than to use their own transport, either because of lack of public transport or for strictly practical reasons, such as carrying tools and equipment.

The justice secretary had admitted this morning that he was giving «further consideration» to the case for public interest after reports over the weekend suggested reasons for the move.

There have been many cases reported from Missouri in which people have not made any donation to Obama and were charged fraudelently, one person being charged 176,000.00 The others were charged around 2300.00 Pretty sad, and with reports of as mucha s 63 million dollars coming from foreign sources of the 150 million dollars they just took in September, can anyone say «bogus fund raising» and this is the exact reason why Obama did nt take public financing, he knew he was going to get outside help and just goes to show how shady he is and has been his whole political career!

There's an equally legitimate reason as well for a 2008 state ethics ruling that bans public officials from taking, or even just looking for, free tickets to sporting events in most cases.

For that reason, it was «prudent» in 2004, once the first transfusion - related case was discovered, for the UK to ban transfusion recipients from later donating blood, say Kumanan Wilson and Maura Ricketts of Toronto General Hospital and the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Influenza remains a major health problem in the United States, resulting each year in an estimated 36,000 deaths and 200,000 hospitalizations.4 Those who have been shown to be at high risk for the complications of influenza infection are children 6 to 23 months of age; healthy persons 65 years of age or older; adults and children with chronic diseases, including asthma, heart and lung disease, and diabetes; residents of nursing homes and other long - term care facilities; and pregnant women.4 It is for this reason that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that these groups, together with health care workers and others with direct patient - care responsibilities, should be given priority for influenza vaccination this season in the face of the current shortage.1 Other high - priority groups include children and teenagers 6 months to 18 years of age whose underlying medical condition requires the daily use of aspirin and household members and out - of - home caregivers of infants less than 6 months old.1 Hence, in the case of vaccine shortages resulting either from the unanticipated loss of expected supplies or from the emergence of greater - than - expected global influenza activity — such as pandemic influenza, which would prompt a greater demand for vaccination5 — the capability of extending existing vaccine supplies by using alternative routes of vaccination that would require smaller doses could have important public health implications.

However, since public efforts have been made to add iodine to the salt supplies of most industrialized countries, Hashimoto's has become the primary reason for hypothyroidism, responsible for 90 - 97 % of cases of hypothyroidism in the United States.

For that reason, it is all the more interesting to observe that in some cases a shift in public opinion seems to be occurring.

There is reason to believe that this might be the case: for instance, in prior research at the K - 12 level, Hart and I found that offering school vouchers to economically disadvantaged families improved the productivity of traditional public schools.

This case is different because a court has decided that it's not only unfair funding statutes that can render a public education system unconstitutionally discriminatory and unjust: unfair education statutes of other types, including employment laws, can be overturned for the same reason.

The U.S. Supreme Court later applied similar reasoning in the 2011 case ACSTO v. Winn, rejecting the standing of petitioners to challenge Arizona's scholarship tax - credit law because the funds did not become public money since they had not «come into the tax collector's hands.»

I'm sure there are a number of reasons why this solution may not be feasible, but it sure would provide a disincentive to charters to NOT cull the cream of the crop from public schools then push the more challenging cases out of their schools and into neighborhood public schools, at least not midway through the academic year when the negative consequences of such outcomes are compounded because of the disruption this transience evidently brings to the student and her new schoolmates.

For these reasons, the 2017 EdCan Network Indigenous «Innovation that Sticks» Dropout Prevention Case Study Research Program will focus on one alternative school, public school or school district with a specialized dropout prevention program for students who identify as First Nation, Inuit and Métis, anywhere in Canada to share with educators facing similar challenges across Canada.

Izumi makes the case that while many school choice supporters rely on academic school performance data to show that public schools are failing, there are many other equally important reasons to support it.

Amy Wilson found herself a test case for public tolerance of art, when The Daily News cited a work exhibited at the Drawing Center as reason to bar the museum from a proposed International Freedom Center at Ground Zero.

There's got to be some reason the facts of the case are not being presented to the public.

One technic we use in security / public / tax policy to check their robustness is the folowing: «imagine that someone just want to break what you plan»... no reason, no interest... just silly evilness... how will he do... and start an ocean 11 plot... when the plot is set, just check if it is possible... in the case of climate, or fukushima like scenario it would be an evil divinity, a crasy group...

Just how would you recommend someone to alert the public that «they» (IPCC in this case) are not uniformly accurate, well - reasoned and correct?

And you might admit that occasional exposure of her kind of extremism is as useful to the case for reason, as the public lunacy of Mann.

However, even for slander per se, there is the question of whether Spencer and Christy are «public figures,» in which case they would have to show «actual malice» to actually prevail in a defamation law suit, meaning the comment was false, and Trenberth et al. knew or had reason to know it was false.

Evidence for climate change is reasonably good, but since no one seems to be able or willing to make public all data adjustments and the reasoning behind them, I don't think the case is unequivocal.

The broad masses of the people are not made up of diplomats or professors of public jurisprudence nor simply of persons who are able to form reasoned judgment in given cases, but a vacillating crowd of human children who are constantly wavering between one idea and another.

Thus, for example, in the present case the president of the Queen's Bench Division observed: «Courts and Tribunals acting judicially are generally required to give reasons for their decisions, and further normally required to publish them for the proper public administration of justice so as to comply with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.»

He indicated that the bases for challenge at public law are well known and include «error of law, irrationality, procedural (and other) unfairness and in some cases a failure to give adequate reasons».

To treat its «case law» as irrelevant would disregard a considerable and growing body of non-binding, but solid legal reasoning on access to information, public participation and access to justice in environmental matters.

A ZDNet article entitled Cloud computing: Four reasons why companies are choosing public over private or hybrid clouds makes a case for the value of the public cloud.

He continued: «Our Director also set out the criteria he would take into account when deciding which cases we should accept for investigation: the impact of the case on UK financial plc in general and the City of London in particular; the scale of losses, actual or potential; the extent of the gain, actual or potential; whether we were dealing with a new kind of fraud or whether there was some other public interest reason for taking the case on.

One reason may be that, in such cases, decisions of public bodies have less impact on third parties than in other areas of public law practice.

Cases involving NCR often attract a great deal of media attention due to sensational fact situations, and the reasoning behind an NCR finding can be mystifying to the public.

The Justices» Clerks» Society and Magistrates» Association with the President's approval have just issued guidance which prohibits local authorities from drafting reasons in public and private law cases and whether the proceedings have been contested, agreed or unopposed.

Nevertheless, other implications of the latter case remain undiscussed in Dano, in particular the finding of the Court in Brey that Member States may not automatically assume that an EU national claiming social assistance can no longer invoke the Citizenship Directive by reason of being a burden on the public funds of the home state.

In the reasoning of the majority this case was among a number where public authorities had been given powers and duties to protect a class of person (the case of powers and duties of local authorities to investigate alleged abuse of children was drawn as a parallel) and in exercising those powers may cause loss to third parties.

In these cases the issue was located within non-Treaty justifications, so called mandatory requirements, rather than public policy, but given the national scale and consequences of the claimed migration and the claimed threat, there seems no reason why it could not be brought within public policy too.

There may be many reasons for this: computer - based technology or similar tools require a certain degree of literacy, they require a certain degree of technical knowledge (even though we may think this is pretty minimal), they require access to the technology in an environment that the individual feels reasonably comfortable raising his or her problem (we think that having available terminals in libraries and other public places may be sufficient, but this may not be the case), they require a basic knowledge that allows the recipient of information to interpret and apply it.

«The public interest in securing the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding would be served in this case more fully by considering the merits of the asserted ground of unpatentability based on Hideji rather than by denying consideration for reasons tied to Petitioner's previous failure to submit the requisite attesting affidavit.»

To which extent do you think the analysis of the ECJ in Case C - 43 / 10 Nomarchiaki on irrigation (environment) and supply of drinking water (human health) as imperative reasons of overriding public interest is transposalbe as a rule - of - reason - justification to the free movement provisions?

A letter of wishes can also be a useful way for a testator to record the reasons why he has decided not to benefit any particular family member if he is concerned that that person might dispute the terms of his will after his death — although in that case it would have to be made public to carry weight as evidence in court.

In that case the proceedings were a different claim to that which a without prejudice letter had been written in relation to, but privilege continued to apply by reason of public policy.

While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding actual malice, 175 three matters must be stressed: first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the public figure concept.

The Ohio Senate yesterday approved a plan (SJR 1) to create a Public Office Compensation Commission with the power to reduce judicial salaries mid-term in cases of fiscal emergency, a departure from a 2014 proposal which would have allowed them to be diminished for any reason.

The landmark case, brought by Thompsons on behalf of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) concluded that workers do not need to prove the «reason why» the practice in question puts, or would, put the affected group at a particular disadvantage.