Sentences with phrase «reasons authors do»

Some pretty savvy people, among them Eric Flint and Cory Doctorow, say the reasons authors don't make money is because they don't have the attention of the reader.

There are typically three reasons authors do box sets: 1.

This article implies that you can not believe in atoms and the wonder of evolution without being atheist or non-Christian, which is simply not true (I feel more theistic in a biochem class than I do talking to close - minded «Christian» creationist idiots, interestingly enough for the same reasons the author does).

In their anatomical reasoning the authors do not explain why so many women don't climax even with sufficient clitoral stimulation — or why some are capable of orgasm in the absence of it.

One reason some authors don't get their books reviewed is failure to acknowledge the review policy of the book bloggers.

Not exact matches

Time - management expert Laura Vanderkam, author of What The Most Successful People Do Before Breakfast (Portfolio Trade, 2013) says one of the reasons people say they don't like mornings is that they stay up too latDo Before Breakfast (Portfolio Trade, 2013) says one of the reasons people say they don't like mornings is that they stay up too late.

And if you want to take things a step further you can add a related idea from author Laura Vanderkam that works for similar reasons — stop saying you don't have time for things.

Part of the reason the report's authors believe executives aren't doing enough to protect their companies is because they are procrastinating on security - related projects and initiatives.

Charles Koch, the chairman of Koch Industries, the $ 115 billion leviathan of 100,000 employees, and author of Good Profit: How Creating Value for Others Built One of the World's Most Successful Companies, says the most compelling reason to focus on profit is because you'll do more good in the long run.

According to Dr. Heidi Grant Halvorson, associate director for the Motivation Science Center at the Columbia University Business School and author of Nine Things Successful People Do Differently, there are three reasons that people miss deadlines — and a single simple solution for all three.

Although the authors — Richard L. George, Thomas d'Aquino, Dominic D'Alessandro, Paul Desmarais, Jr., Jacques Lamarre, Gwyn Morgan and Gordon Nixon - are the chief executives respectively of Suncor Energy Inc., the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, Manulife Financial, Power Corporation of Canada, SNC - Lavalin Group Inc., EnCana Corporation and RBC Financial Group, my reason for referring to this piece has more to do with each and every one of you.

«Most of the tasks that you procrastinate on aren't actually difficult to do — you have the talent and skills to accomplish them — you just avoid starting them for one reason or another,» writes author and entrepreneur James Clear.

The rigidity of budgeting is actually one reason they don't work over the long run for most people, says Certified Financial Planner Brad Klontz, author of «Mind Over Money» and co-founder of the Financial Psychology Institute.

He includes references to the Bible for the same reason nearly all authors do, religious or not — because it's a reference the public is familiar with.

«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»

Of course, most NT scholars show good reasons why it's likely that Peter did not author Peter 2.

Of course most NT scholars find good reason to think that Peter did not author Peter 2, where Peter allegedly deems Paul's works as divine scripture.

Perhaps the author should consider one additional (i.e., the primary) reason why the millennials are leaving church: they don't believe it's true.

If one is persuaded that Whitehead's account is indeed the most penetrating that now exists, that it does justice to the complexity of the phenomena of science and of history alike, then the fact that it too leads, almost in spite of the author's apparent intention, to a doctrine of God as the source and ground of order is an important further confirmation of the inescapability for speculative reason of some kind of belief in God.

I recommend that every Christian read the bombshell book, «Twenty - Six Reasons Why Jews Don't Believe in Jesus» by orthodox Jewish author, Asher Norman.

Honestly, the reason these comments are so critical and judgmental is because the people issuing their ignorant opinions do not see the bigger picture the author intended to paint.

The author of Hebrews ignored the idiom almost completely and the Fourth Evangelist developed his own way of using it.4 If, in the present, or in the future, Christians wish to confess Jesus Christ as Lord, without resorting to the idiom of resurrection, then we must acknowledge that there may be valid reasons for doing so.5

Tandamonium As an agnostic, a wife of an Active Duty Marine for over 20 years and mother of two Active Duty Marines, I thought the author did a great job getting to the nuance of the reason behind the decision and also on giving some insight into Anabaptists.

The exact reason I don't assosiacte with any religion is because of people like this author.

This article is an excellent example and the the very reason that I claim that «I'm spiritual, but not religious»: bigots like the author pushing their beliefs unto me, under threats of eternal damnation; arguing that if I do not follow them, I am a rotten human being destroying society.

The probable reason is that this author was writing primarily for the church that was centered in Jerusalem, and the Jews had long hesitated to speak the name of God openly, lest in doing so they profane him in violation of the third commandment.

Otherwise, what reason do we have for supposing that God, as «author of the whole drama,» meant the statement to be understood, in the light of subsequent developments, as a reference to humanity's future redemption?»

She writes a lot better than the author of «Shades of Grey» & she does have a reasoned stance.

I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion

Jesus as a person does not exist outside the gospels and the only reason he exists there is because of their authors» faith in the Resurrection....

The only reason that it goes viral because of the fact that the author of the video is NOT a self - proclaimed atheist or doesn't proclaim himself as an atheist (yet) but (still on a mask as) a Conservative Christian.

Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds, that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his Supreme will that free it shall remain, by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint: That all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone.

The author states «We don't know the reason God allows evil and suffering to continue, or why it is so random, but now at least we know what the reason isn't, what it can't be.

The author was saying it does, because if there is a God, even if we don't know why evil exists, if there is a God, there is a reason, even if we don't know it.

If God is the author of science, knowing that what is healthy and good can not at the same time be evil and sinful is reason to know that God does not condemn ho mo se x u ality.

Although I write for a living, everyone I know who writes about food and recipes, from top - selling authors to people who work for small community - based publications, will invariably tell you that the main reason they work so hard to create recipes is because they really do want people to cook and bake from them.

Does the author even know the reason we've coped without Sanchez was due to Campbell's quality in the first place?

[1 - 9] As a 2013 research paper [7] and a number of other recent studies [12 - 15] show, education alone (or at least that which focuses on educating athletes about the signs and symptoms of concussion and not changing attitudes about reporting behavior) does not appear capable of solving the problem, because the reasons for under - reporting are largely cultural, [2,3,9,10, 12 - 15] leading the paper's author to conclude that «other approaches might be needed to identify injured athletes.»

Now, what the authors do not measure, and acknowledge as a limitation, is how long the child wakes, the reason for waking, does the child require parental help, breastfeeding, etc..

The reasons are as yet unknown but the authors of the study point out that «It is possible that babies fed to a routine become relatively more passive participants in the world: feeding (arguably the most important event in their lives) is something which is done to them, rather than something which their own desires and actions play a part in bringing about.

This is the main reason I want to do some sleep training, I plan on doing [author's name removed because all the sleep training methods are so similar anyway]'s technique.

«When Success Leads to Failure,» The Atlantic «The Gift of Failure,» New York Times «If Your Kid Left His Term Paper At Home, Don't Bring It To Him» New York Magazine «Books That Changed My Mind This Year,» Fortune «New Book Suggests Parents Learn to Let Kids Fail,» USA Today «7 Rules for Raising Self - Reliant Children,» Forbes «Before You Let Your Child Fail, Read This,» Huffington Post «How Schools Are Handling an Overparenting Crisis,» NPR «Why Failure Hits Girls So Hard,» Time «The Value of a Mess,» Slate «4 Reasons Why Every Educator Should Read «The Gift of Failure,»» Inside Higher Ed «Why We Should Let Our Children Fail,» The Guardian (UK) «Shelly's Bookworms: The Gift of Failure,» WFAA Dallas «Why I Don't Want My Kids to be Lazy Like Me,» Yahoo Parenting «Jessica Lahey,» Celia Walden for The Telegraph (UK) «How to To Give Your Child The Gift of Failure,» Huffington Post «The Gift of Failure,» Doug Fabrizio, Radio West «In the Author's Voice: The Gift of Failure,» WISU / NPR «The Gift of Failure,» The Good Life Project «Giving Our Children the Gift of Failure,» ScaryMommy «Lyme Resident's Book Challenges Parents and Kids on Failure,» Valley News «The Gift of Failure,» The Jewish Press

«If children come into the world with the burden of saving a marriage, as many do, they sense it,» says single dad Joe Sindoni, author of «50 Reasons to Not Have Kids: And What to Do If You Have Them Anyway.&raqudo, they sense it,» says single dad Joe Sindoni, author of «50 Reasons to Not Have Kids: And What to Do If You Have Them Anyway.&raquDo If You Have Them Anyway.»

As Professor Jihani said in an interview with an anonymous colleague of the author's in December 2011, «if we don't start to investigate and prosecute Saif, the incessant demand to turn him over to the ICC will increase in force, and we will have no convincing reason for not doing so.»

Note: Interviews that were done as part of the governor's 2014 campaign or were conducted for non-governmental reasons, such as to promote the book he authored, typically don't appear on his official schedules and are thus excluded.

The key question in determining responsibility is this: Did these authors have any reason to suspect the data?

Beales and co-senior study author João Ruggiero Neto of São Paulo State University in Brazil suspected that the reason might have something to do with the unique properties of cancer cell membranes.

«Currently a majority of patients undergo colon resections for large polyps that don't harbor any cancer cells, which means in many cases a person's colon is being removed for noncancerous reasons, based on subjective criteria,» said lead study author Emre Gorgun, MD, FACS, FASCRS, a staff surgeon in the department of colorectal surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio.

Although the research doesn't clarify the reason for the rearrangement, the authors suggest that further studies could explain the shift.

It claims that another reason Marshall did not include Mallon as an author on the PLOS Biology paper was that he wanted to «retaliat [e] for... cooperation with authorities into [such] actions.»