The mere absence of any reference to evidence in
reasons for judgment does not establish that the trial judge failed to consider that evidence.
For the reasons that follow, I conclude that while it is desirable that judges express their conclusions in their own words, incorporating substantial amounts of material from submissions or other legal sources into
reasons for judgment does not without more permit the decision to be set aside.
[35] The concern about copying in the judicial context is not that the judge is taking credit for someone else's prose, but rather that it may be evidence that
the reasons for judgment do not reflect the judge's thinking.
The reasons for judgment do not indicate whether a real estate licensee was involved in the sale of the property.
Not exact matches
RE: «when you're standing before your
judgment being judged
for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «
reason» with you» So, you're so SURE gawwwwwwd didn't give us science that you forego all medical treatment, and you live like the Amish....
In the final
judgment, it may be the greater treason to
do the right thing
for the wrong
reason.
For some
reason he didn't pay attention to the quote in the bible that says to «use sound
judgment».
His
judgment seems to be that, even though some kind of faith or intuition is a formal requisite
for critical reflection on the nature of God, the specific content or character that faith has as a concrete, historically conditioned phenomenon
does not materially affect the
reasoning process which is both possible and appropriate in such reflection.
One important
reason has to
do with the prominence in such settings of the
judgment that the term «interreligious dialogue» labels the only proper mode
for intercourse among religious communities.
But to wimp out with the «Will jolly, I don't really know
for sure because there are all these different views held by different people
for different
reasons and based on very different levels of
judgment and intelligence, so I don't really know what I personally think about anything.»
However this must be
done in such a way that the
reasons for both opinions, that is, those favorable and those unfavorable to evolution, be weighed and judged with the necessary seriousness, moderation and measure, and provided that all are prepared to submit to the
judgment of the Church, to whom Christ has given the mission of interpreting authentically the Sacred Scriptures and of defending the dogmas of faithful»
In separate (brief)
reasons for judgment, Justice Gageler agreed with the conclusion in the majority
reasons that Barbaro
does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and joined in the proposed orders.
And I have had moms that gave breastfeeding a shot, and they
did it
for some time, and it wasn't working
for whatever personal
reason, and there's no
judgment, and then I can also help them to gently end their breastfeeding journey.
The seven - member panel of justices, presided over by incoming Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo,
did not give
reasons for their
judgment but indicated that they will make available the full details of the decision in a few hours.
The seven - member panel of justices, presided over by incoming Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo,
did not give
reasons for their
judgment but indicated that they will make available the full details of the decision in a few...
The court
did not provide
reasons for its
judgment but noted that detailed
reasons for the verdict would be provided on February 12.
The court
did not provide
reasons for its
judgment but noted that detailed
reasons for -LSB-...]
Even though the disgust response arose
for reasons that have little to
do with morality, it seems to be pretty effective at shaping moral
judgments.»
The
reason adequacy studies tend to prefer the professional
judgment method is clear enough, and it
does not seem like a stretch to suggest that the CEP might prefer that method
for the very same
reason.
(c) Violation of 14th Amendment procedural due process The court granted the defendants» motion
for summary
judgment for this claim, finding that Ms. I
did not meet the applicable precedent, which requires at the threshold an allegation that the
reason for the forced discharge was to avoid a pre-termination hearing.
Sometimes authors are not always writing at their best, or readers sometimes can't or don't appreciate the story
for whatever
reasons or are not fair and accurate in
judgment.
Do you have a nonpolitical
reason for questioning her
judgment on this question?
The harsh
judgment of science
For good and sufficient
reasons, the article «Where
do winds come from?»
Opp was fired Dec. 22 and Mackoff made it «very clear» the
reason for termination had nothing to
do with her pregnancy and everything to
do with willingness to «concot a falsehood and how that negatively impacted my ability to trust her
judgment and her honesty.»
In stipulating to the
judgment, Bluford stated that he «
does not admit that any of the allegations set forth in the complaint are true or valid,» and that he agreed to the
judgment «
for the sole
reason that he wishes to avoid the time, expense, uncertainty and risk of litigation in this case.»
However, the Court held that this conduct was still relevant to the issue of risk of dissipation by effectively
reasoning that if Mr Grigorishin could transfer away assets
for one
reason, he could
do it
for other
reasons, including to avoid paying the
judgment.
On 1 March 2016 the Court of Justice of the European Union gave its
judgment in the joined cases of Ibrahim Alo and Amira Osso, Cases C - 443 / 14 and C - 444 / 14, ruling that the EU's Qualification Directive
does not sanction the imposition of restrictions of the freedom of movement
for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection, and that such a limitation is not justifiable
for reasons of territorial sharing of social assistance burdens, while at the same time leaving it up to the referring German Federal Administrative Court to decide whether the limitation can be justified
for reasons of migration and integration policy.
However, the General Court accepted Gifi's argument that the Board failed to examine all the evidence it had produced, and the Board's
judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application
for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied
reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»
It
does not appear from my reading of either the majority or minority
reasons for judgment in Harmeling that the section then equivalent to our present s. 6 was under consideration.
Also, just in case anyone was looking
for some procedural clarity, we also are told that «a statement of
reasons is important,» perhaps especially so if a party «argues that the Guidelines reflect an unsound
judgment, or,
for example, that they
do not generally treat certain defendant characteristics in the proper way.»
In most cases, when Canadian judges
do so, they are quoting English
reasons for judgment.
For this reason, our Rules of Civil Procedure provide for the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full tri
For this
reason, our Rules of Civil Procedure provide
for the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full tri
for the option of a summary
judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and
does not require a full trial.
Despite judicial conservatism, biomechanical evidence
does appear to be gaining acceptance by BC Courts as demonstrated in
reasons for judgment released today.
«It was pretty difficult to sit in that courtroom and hear the judge, when he was offering up his
reasons for judgment, say repeatedly that the Treaty 8 stewards of the land had no legal right or standing to be
doing what they were
doing,» said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs to rabble.
Even after the
reasons for judgment were released and the defendants brought a motion
for a mistrial, they
did not base it on the drowsiness of the trial judge, or even raise the issue.
Although Justice Fish
did not cite Ashlee until the end of his
judgment (at para. 144), and then only to respond to the Crown's interpretation of the majority
judgment in Ashlee, his
reasons for decision made many of the same points raised by Justice Conrad in dissent in Ashlee.
The judge
did recognize a positive contingency of favourable surgery on Mr. Ostrikoff's shoulder; however, the scale of that contingency, perhaps in the range of 35 %, is not discussed in the
reasons for judgment.
The failure to refer to evidence in the course of careful and detailed
reasons for judgment suggests, not that the trial judge ignored that evidence, but rather that she
did not regard that evidence as significant.
Does it matter to you that, in this case, if we take the
reasons for judgment at face value, Metron is legally responsible but not morally blameworthy?
For now we don't have
reason to think this decision will have such an effect (and I note that the term
does not appear in the
judgment).
The decision of the unanimous court, however
does not attempt to tackle all of Justice Sanderson's «lengthy, detailed and complex
reasons for judgment».
I expect that you don't actually know what any judge is is fed up about, beyond whatever you want to read into whatever you read in published
reasons for judgment.
If
for some
reason you don't trust my
judgment, here's the full list of defensive driving schools in Arizona that are approved
for ticket dismissal and insurance reduction.
We
do not know if this was
done for reasons of clinical
judgment or because they
did not know that this option was available.
If you
do not yet have a
judgment, then you can change your parenting plan at any time,
for any
reason, because in a pre-
judgment situation, the order is considered «temporary.»
FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and
for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered
for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he
does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests
for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the
reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.