Among the many compelling
reasons for religious people to engage science is the human tendency to base our worldviews on the prevailing physics of the day.
Not exact matches
Religious people and atheists drive me nuts
for the same
reason: they're certain about the unknowable.
It is very like, as with 99.9 % of
religious people, believe what's in the bible
for a single
reason — you were taught to.
(
For debated
reasons, high fertility correlates with stronger
religious commitment, and recent immigrants in America are among the most likely
people to be devout.)
Stalin didn't kill tens of millions of his own
people for religious reasons.
While taking advatage of
people's faith
for personal
reasons is terrible, please do not assume that being
religious means someone is uneducated.
The
reason you find supposedly «
religious»
people against healthcare
for everyone goes back to this country's Calvinist roots.
The death penalty should be abolished not
for religious reasons (also
religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but because every
person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean
for the future of the species?
Finally, to make it perfectly clear, what he was getting at is that he (as well as I) believe
people don't always turn to religion
for the right... or maybe not
for the traditionally intended
reasons, or if they were already «kind of»
religious, they strengthen that religion
for the wrong
reasons.
For this
reason we probably ought to distinguish between anti-Semitism and anti-Jewish thought — the former being that modern phenomenon all democratic
persons are eager to combat; the latter the expressions of hostility or dislike found in earlier periods as a result of the specific
religious and historical role the Jews and their antagonists have played.
That there have «only» been 75 - 100 million
people killed
for religious reasons is hardly compelling evidence of God's power to produce moral followers.
But one thing I don't think will ever change, but again, I absolutely believe that at least one
person at sometime over another, chose to either be
religious, or go from typical belief status to fanatical
for the wrong
reason (s).
There is no way to estimate the number of
people killed
for religious reasons over the course of history, but the total is signficant.
Actually, many
people seem to think that a lot of
people who attend church do not follow Jesus, but merely attend church
for their own
reasons, such as needing some sort of
religious system to identify with.
The only
reason that the teaching of a «devil» exists in my opinion is because it is a useful tool
for religious leaders to use to frighten
people into obedience to their edicts.
Many of them have a poor understanding of why a
person may be
religious and their
reasons for choosing to do so.
I know
people who
for personal
reasons are
for or against certain
religious / social / political issues who migrated to
religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree with these
peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.
For this reason I gladly stand for religious liberty alongside people who do not believe the same gospel that I
For this
reason I gladly stand
for religious liberty alongside people who do not believe the same gospel that I
for religious liberty alongside
people who do not believe the same gospel that I do.
Except
for some
reason you want to get «all up in my face» over my experiences, which is ironically kind of like what some atheists say all the
religious people do.
After cleaning the puke off of my shoes I realized the
religious people vote
for the same
reasons they go to church:
I believe in God, and I identify as a Christian, and this identity as a Christian has provided me with the insight to know that
people who oppose gay marriage based on «
religious reasons» are just making excuses
for their homophobia.
Another day of religion marring the world
for no other
reason than that
religious people believe in something that just is not there.
For reasons utilitarians might wish to explain, many of the
people who create the most utility are deeply
religious.
But the word «religion» didn't become a bad word until
religious people gave
reason for it to be a bad word.
Secondly;
for religious reasons many wish to believe that God empathizes with creation and that
people are not alone in the crush of experience.
For this
reason, some
persons who might make good
religious leaders are lost to the profession simply because they made early decisions to take other paths.
Contemporary warfare has in fact taken the form of local conflicts, more often than not civil wars, in which no great alliances of nations are involved; these have been wars fought
for reasons based in local rivalries, typically inflamed by historical animosities, ethnic disparity, or
religious difference, rather than
for reasons of global Realpolitik; they have been fought not with nuclear weapons (or, indeed, other types of weapons of mass - destructive capability) or the latest in military technology, but instead with conventional weaponry, often of old design, and often limited to rifles, knives, grenades, and light, crew - served weapons which individual soldiers can carry on their
persons.
But think
for a moment of the sort of «civil society» we would have if
religious people were exempt from any law they deemed «unjust»
for religious reasons.
Those who allowed them self to spill blood of a Muslim
for any
reason religious or non
religious, will not mind spilling bloods of any
people Muslims or non
for any
reason they will invent because they became as addicted as those playing it video games on play stations... What is happening to the world?
The bill, called the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), would protect the right of every
person to practice his religion, without exception, unless the government can show that it bas a «compelling»
reason to interfere (meaning that the
reasons for the interference are extraordinarily important and can not reasonably be attained in any other way).
If they can fool Americans into executing or imprisoning their own
people for religious reasons, then that is the camel's nose into the tent.
The war on terrorism is a war against al - Qaeda, not Islam, he says, and the
reason for the war is our foes» clear aggression against innocent
people, not their
religious convictions.
Before you know it
people will be allowed to kill
people for religious reason and all terrorists attacks and cold blooded murders will be justified.
Self - education, especially in terms of
religious education, was the biggest
reason for the erosion of the type of priesthood power that lead to the Crusades and the Inquisition, as
people no longer had to take the priests at their word... they could read the Bible
for themselves and discern truth from lies.
Western society, while still giving lip - service to religion, has evolved past the point where (
for most
people anyways) a satire or insult about jebus, the pope, or any other
religious or political figure is
reason enough to drawn down and start shooting.
the governments of Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot killed millions of
people for religious reasons only — AND THEY RULED ONLY BECAUSE AND ONLY AS LONG AS GOD WILLED IT.
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot all killed
people for the being
religious, they also killed others
for other
reasons, but they did kill many
people specifically because they believed in God and
for that
reason only.
That being said, not many
people are aware of these anomalies on our planet since there is no formal teaching which questions religions and / or deductions of our archaeologists;
for this
reason, we can not blame anyone who has been raised with strict
religious doctrine wishing to display their
religious symbol.
@Chad «the governments of Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot killed millions of
people for religious reasons only:
«Today, Christianity has become the most persecuted religion, where out of five
people killed [
for]
religious reasons, four of them are Christians,» Catholic News Agency (CNA) quoted Hungary's Minister
for Human Resources, Zoltan Balog, as saying.
The content of
religious education is too feeble to sustain faith and lacks the power to convince young
people that there are reasonsfor believing and
reasons for living their lives
for God.
I think that most of the
people who are self - identified as «spiritual but not
religious» have come to the realization deep inside that they don't really believe in God, but they are unwilling to let go,
for two
reasons:
On the contrary, I feel that there must be a void in the lives of
religious people to feel that they need to force themselves to keep believing in these silly myths in order to have a
reason to do good things and be good
people... that it's not enough
for them to be «good»
for the sake of goodness,
for the sake of our society and our world... that they must believe that there is to be some great reward
for themselves or some great punishment after death in order to motivate them to be good.
The
reason that Atheists are putting up signs is because we really do feel sorry
for the
religious people... Only my fellow Atheists would understand where I am coming from with that statement..
The number of
people killed
for religious reasons would have been tiny — the deaths were political.
Hardly anyone seriously doubts any more that there was a Galilean Jew named Jesus, who
for a short time attracted local attention as a teacher who took an unusual interest in
people and uttered some startling things, and who
for this
reason fell foul of the
religious authorities, the result of it all being that the Roman governor had him crucified.
And
Religious people have NEVER been condescending, they have NEVER persecuted others
for their beliefs, They have NEVER killed in the name of their God or even worse used the name of their God to justify killings
for political, territorial, and economic
reasons or even just because they hate someone.
The rules of the condo do not single out any group or
person for any
reason,
religious or otherwise.
For some
reason, otherwise smart, articulate
people accept the most bizzare supernatural nonsense under the guise of «
religious beliefs».
They're taking that fight into the marketplace and it is a marketplace reality that many
people celebrate Christmas
for other than
religious reasons or they celebrate around the Christmas season but celebrate some other holiday.