Not exact matches
Unsurprisingly, PSAC has decided to work against the re-election
of the Conservatives: the
reasoning is presumably that once the Conservatives go, so does the
austerity.
It seems to my perceptions that you might be having a personal identity conundrum... Speaking from experience; many folks seem unable to cope with individualized rationalizing complexities... Giving up attempting, toward understanding social
austerities which encompass individualism, gives people their identification
of oneness... Individualisms are set upon the relativities
of quaint somberness issues in daily moderations... Religious identities are as emotionalized labels giving people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental
reasoning... Whether or not, religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to serve...
There is every
reason to believe that a life
of material
austerity,
of pride and pleasure in the quality
of workmanship rather than in the amount consumed, a life lived in a warm and supportive community, would be far healthier for our society, ecologically and sociologically, than our present dominant pattern
of ever - accelerating consumption.
but he extends his «
reasoning» to a range
of other political and economic issues, including the heated ideological battle over whether Keynesian deficit spending or
austerity is the best cure for government deficits.
After some reflection, and a second viewing, it's clear that the film's mix
of austerity and audacity is also its
reason for being.
The
reason utilities have traditionally been viewed as a safe haven for risk averse investors is that while people may buy fewer iPhones or designer jeans in a downturn, they still need the lights on, even with the prospect
of a US
Austerity Plan perhaps akin to what Europe is seeing now.
«There is no
reason why in a society which has reached the general level
of wealth which ours has attained [NW note: Hayek was writing not in prosperous post-war America, but in war - torn,
austerity - ridden Britain in 1943] the first kind
of security should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom.
The minority (Sumption / Hughes) view has the cogency
of austere legal theory; the majority, equally if no more cogent, fasten onto the choice
of the word «damage» without the definite article, and the policy
reasons which ought to mitigate that
austerity in these personal injury cases.