Sentences with phrase «reasons people call»

Chocolate ingestion, especially dark chocolate and cocoa, remains one of the most common food - related reasons people call pet poison control centers and emergency hospitals.

The top reasons people call AAA for roadside assistance is for dead batteries or flat tires, Paul says.

There's a reason people call us their soulmate workout.

@chrischeshire the same reason people called for a «bottom» in oil prices for the last 18 months, because they hope and pray that their poor investments will break even in the face of uncertainty.

The most common reason people call my office with a cat behavior problem is because the cat isn't using the litter box.

This feature is the reason people call survival benefits a reward from the insurance company to the assured for taking proper care of himself or herself.

Not exact matches

Heffernan explores the neuroscience behind what psychologists call «motivated reasoning,» the processes by which people contort their thinking to avoid feeling anxious or guilty.

One reason it's exploding is what researchers call «The IKEA Effect»: People prefer products they help to make (or at least assemble).

Pew also called on regulators to ban overdraft options and fees, something that would undermine the entire reason people use these cards.

«It's clear that people call in sick for a variety of reasons, some less honest, but everyone will catch a cold at some point and legitimately need the time off,» said Ted Karkus, CEO for ProPhase Labs, the manufacturer of Cold - EEZE.

According to a story in Bloomberg BusinessWeek, his reasoning goes like this: «Call me opportunistic; I thought I could get better people with less competition because we were willing to understand the skills and capabilities that many of these women had.»

When I called people to ask if our new Ocean Magic books were doing well or not, I got reasons that made sense to me.

It's called «social» media for a reason: People are generally open to communication on social media channels.

Some people say that cold calls are still very effective — and there's good reason why firms still continue to hire competent outbound sales people.

But two, in his hunt for the person who was leaking to the media, whom he called «Mr. X» for some reason,

The questions is whether or not people are willing to see God as an old man in a robe with who creates essence out of nothing, or if people are willing to see God as the «creative» event that occured, a so - called actual essence of energy that was the over-all reason why we are here now.

I have a very good reason to believe that this person who calls IT - self HeavenSent is NOT who is claiming to be.

Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.

But for some reason you white liberal think it's wrong for a blackman if that's what you want call him specifically provides help for people who look like him, you say it's wrong.

Programs like these are called safety nets for a reason — yank them away and people get hurt, today more than ever.

We're called to stand beside the disenfranchised with love and understanding and to hear the plight of people who have a reason to be angry.

It's intellectually dishonest of you to suggest there is only one reason people resort to name - calling, but based on your comments honesty is not very important to you.

And your spellbook calling nonbelievers pigs is part of the reason so many people see the sheer arrogance and hypocrisy in your mythology.

A politics of reason gave way to a politics of emotion and flirted with the politics of irrationality; the claims of moral reason were displaced by moralism; the notion that all men and women were called to live lives of responsibility was displaced by the notion that some people were, by reason of birth, victims; patriotism became suspect, to be replaced by a vague internationalism; democratic persuasion was displaced by judicial activism.

If we look at Scripture and history, we see that the reason God's messengers get condemned and criticized and killed is because they never go with the religious status quo, but instead, call on the religious people to repent and change their ways, and abandon the foolish and empty chase after religious rituals and regulations.

When you live in a society where there is a high value placed on calling yourself Christian and going to church, and there are even promising career paths available, there's always going to be people who become Christians for the wrong reasons.

The reason you don't prowl around bigfootexists forums and incessantly call people names is that you just really don't care that much about it.

This is assuming, of course, that such a call is desired by the person and there is no psychiatric reason why it would be disturbing.

If your so - called «faith» is so strong and «protects» you from all of your perceived «dangers of evil», then WHY are you so afraid of people who have simply decided to live a life guided by REASON instead of a life guided by contrived dogma and ancient mythology?

Actually, the Heritage people, with good reason, are calling for more judicial activism or, maybe to be more precise, judicial assertiveness.

People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.&People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.&people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.»

You should be pleased then... or perhaps before you go calling people «m0r0ns» - without actually presenting any evidence or reasoning, mind you - you'll learn about the word «not.»

@Voice of Reason — hey voice... that means you have successfully called this Rob person on the carpet for some of his comments.

That if that's their calling of the Lord than should be on salary but a moderate salary not a salary that makes them rich but of a modest lifestyle sure if they have a family living in a home that meets their needs and these millionaire status like cars where your above the people Jesus lived a very conservative life for a reason so that he was not a distraction too his assignment of preach the Gospel being a good example and staying away from any appearance of filthy lucre as we see displayed today as he he who preaches the Gospel if they have no other charge from the Lord than they should live of the Gospel

I suppose that's alright for some people — it's called «faith» for a reason.

If one lets the no - inherent - free - will interpretation of the less than 0.5 % of the Scriptures set the precedence on what the word of God says about man's free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning / interpretation of the majority of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.

«As a person he works, he performs various actions belonging to the work process; independently of their objective content, these actions must all serve to realize his humanity, to fulfill the calling to be a person that is his by reason of his very humanity.»

I mean, isn't that the reason it's called a belief in the first place???? Sorry pops, but that story stinks of «here's how I'll win them over and do my due diligence as a Christian and try to save some people.

The bill, called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), would protect the right of every person to practice his religion, without exception, unless the government can show that it bas a «compelling» reason to interfere (meaning that the reasons for the interference are extraordinarily important and can not reasonably be attained in any other way).

I have yet to meet a person who called Christianity «blind faith» who has thoroughly checked out the reasons FOR faith — and there are too many to count.

So if people became so called «christian leaders» it could be because the media has seen to it that they are in the spotlight for whatever reason..

Gary: The reason I'm hesitant about your definition of «religious» is because, as you say, your definition has everything to do with your personal views and beliefs, and not as much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.

Therefore, I say to the Atheist if you are calling people out to «celebrate reason» then don't be a hypocrite.

The answer, I think, is found in the education of these people, their revulsion with imperial order, and the event of the Great Awakening where the American colonials concurred with Lebniz's comment, «The ultimate reason for things is called God.»

This is also sometimes called agnostic atheism because most people who self - consciously lack belief in gods tend to do so for agnostic reasons.

The fact that people are tempted to abuse Scripture by calling upon it to support whatever they believe is one of the reasons it is inappropriate most of the time to think that the primary theological debate is about whether the biblical text is authoritative or not.

For on the ultimate issue of the self's own potential perfection (what I have called the First Good or goodness of the person), he does not require correct reasoning but only honest effort.

And if you want to use me as a «reason,» well, you know, that's what many of the Sanhedrine will say on judgment day: «But God, that nasty mouthed Steven, it is his fault, he call us «stiff - necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and ear.»

In my book Jewish Renewal: A Path to Healing and Transformation, I point out that in the original Hebrew version the word for «the Lord» that calls Abraham to sacrifice his son is very different than the word for the angel of God (YHVH) who tells Abraham to NOT GO THROUGH WITH IT, and that the reason we Jews celebrate Abraham as the father of our people is NOT because of his faith in being willing to carry out this violent and bloody act, but rather because he was able to hear the voice of God as a voice that allowed him (and through him all subsequent Jewish and Muslim believers) to NOT FOLLOW THE VOICE OF CRUETLY AS SOMEHOW THE VOICE OF GOD.

(Is it just my imagination or do many people who call Jesus «lord and master» shy away from discussions with those of other views because — acting in obedience to someone else's interpretation of Jesus — they have no reasoned convictions of their own?)