Sentences with phrase «reasons than the threat»

Of course, there are better reasons than the threat of litigation to maintain a mentally healthy workplace.

Not exact matches

The defenders of institutionalized Christianity are in a panic over dwindling numbers but rather than ask why people are leaving and wondering if perhaps there is a reason they resort to guilt trips and subtle threats to keep people showing up.

If we threat any US citizen for any reasons, we are not better than other people.

He was like a lost sheep on the first goal, worse than a bag of potatoes on the corner on 2 - 2 (really should've marked Carroll better) and for 3 - 2 he was the direct reason Ospina didn't save it, AND he didn't mark Carroll, being such an obvious goal threat in those situations.

I do however still see the Saints as a bigger threat than the Rams and Vikings and Brees is a big reason why

Raising kids is not always a picnic and many, if not most, parents themselves were often raised under the shadow of threats, force / violence, etc and, more often than not, repeat the same things they were subjected to for no other reason than that it is easier to yell, threaten, intimidate, berate, belittle and / or hit.

But it was more effective than tactics like threats, scolding, or time outs that are unaccompanied by reasoning.

What reason is there to concentrate on an imagined threat to free speech rather than considering the actual impact of Greer's statements?

That is why it is widely believed that other than crude, selfish politics, there can be no legitimate reason for the AGF's latest threat, as conveyed by Obono - Obla, to report the heads of EFCC and ICPC to the presidency for refusing to hand over the case files of more than 35 former governors and senators.

She and Ned search for his father together, each keeping their real reasons for finding the older man a secret from the other, while Fay and Simon piece together Susan's past, which may make her an even greater threat to Henry than his son.

There's a potentially interesting discussion about the exploitation of the male form in Forgetting Sarah Marshall and how, in general, the reaction to male nudity is a hell of a lot different than the reaction to female nudity (there's a good reason that Colin Farrell's penis was excised from the already - unintentionally - funny A Home at the End of the World: male nudity is a threat you respond to with laughter; female nudity is an invitation you respond to with various levels of sexual discomfort)-- but you can still have that discussion without actually enduring the picture.

All that aside, it would be silly to regard Martin McDonagh's film as anything other than a potent Best Picture threat, if for no other reason than it's one of only a few films — certainly including Shape, and extending to Dunkirk, believe it or not — that can feasibly put together a string of wins that would lead to Best Picture.

To add to the unpleasantness, this guy was vicious and ugly in his communications with us, even making nasty threats... for absolutely no reason, other than that he didn't like it one bit that we were discovering the truth about his scam.

If you needed a further reason to deal with enemies quickly whenever they are engaged with you, which means they get placed in your «threat» area, you're unable to do anything other than run away or fight without incurring an enemy attack.

Yet it also acknowledges various non-Western ways of measuring time and, rather than seeing them as a threat to the empire of reason, celebrates them as an enriching expression of the diversity of our existence in time.

«There you go again» with the Alinski tactic of trying to put fear in the place of reason, where the threat is worse than the reality.

There's also every reason to believe that third world poverty is a much bigger threat to us than AGW, and a global bureaucracy that limits economic growth will make this worse, not better.

However, there is one overriding reason why cooling is a greater threat than warming.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

In these cases the issue was located within non-Treaty justifications, so called mandatory requirements, rather than public policy, but given the national scale and consequences of the claimed migration and the claimed threat, there seems no reason why it could not be brought within public policy too.

Sanford studied more than 3,500 married couples and found that a partner's perceived threat of not having control over a situation is one of the top reasons for conflict.