Sentences with phrase «rebate scheme»

The state government has introduced a new rebate scheme for people who purchase a block of land in one of 40 land estates across regional Western Australia.

These hidden rebate schemes are clearly helping to propel all this dreck into school lunch programs.

The «Deep Rural» fuel duty rebate scheme, which Plaid want to introduce in Wales, is expensive to administer and delivers small benefits to very few people.

The government further endorsed the NQF by announcing a range of child care rebate schemes but only to parents utilising licenced out of school care services.

Therefore, the Court held that for this particular rebate scheme to be found unlawful, it was «necessary to consider all the circumstances» (para 29).

The only notable example is Michelin II, a case concerning a retroactive volume rebate scheme, where the GC ignored the presumption of legality in its analysis.

These rebate schemes are now not only a fundamental benefit for families and parents but are also regularly featured, and hotly debated, in federal elections.

The Assistant Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, said yesterday removing insulation or installing the switches were now the only ways to ensure safety in homes fitted with foil insulation under the rebate scheme.

Third, the referring court asked whether a rebate scheme must generate probable and / or appreciable exclusionary effects in order for it to fall within the scope of Article 102 TFEU.

Consequently, the (un) lawfulness of these rebate schemes depends on an in concreto assessment of their effects in the specific market context.

First, the Court was asked to illuminate the criteria to be applied for considering that a rebate scheme as the one at issue in this case is abusive.

The Court considered that the rebate scheme at issue was neither a loyalty rebate nor a pure quantity discount (para 28).

Be this as it may, a rebate scheme must at least generate likely exclusionary effects.

As regards the question concerning the relevance to be attached to the AECT, the Court held unequivocally that this economic test is not a legal prerequisite in order to find a rebate scheme abusive under Article 102 TFEU (para 56).

Following a complaint lodged by Bring Citymail, the NCA issued a decision founding that Post Danmark had abused its dominant position on the Danish bulk mail market, in 2007 and 2008, by operating a rebate scheme for direct advertising mail.