Sentences with phrase «rebuked peter»

Jesus rebuked Peter and quickly healed the servant's ear — and the Sword of Peter took on supernatural powers.Fast forward to modern day where a Biblical archaeology quest for the Sword of Peter is imperative to both Israel and to the Christian world.

It was not as an individual that Peter had challenged Our Lord about the cross, but as leader of the disciples: «But turning and seeing his disciples, he rebuked Peter» (Mk 8, 33).

Just when Peter should have felt the closest to Jesus, however, just when he may have felt the gap between Jesus and him narrow, Jesus rebuked Peter: «Get behind me, Satan!»

Paul the apostle rebuked Peter the super apostle («pillar of the church») for falling into separatism, and not eating with the Gentile believers.

The irony is — in the garden of gethsemane, when the guards came to take Jesus, Peter grabbed a sword / knife, and cut off the ear of the high priests» servant, Malchus, Jesus rebuked Peter, and upon healing Malchus» ear, tells Peter — don't you realize that I could call 12 legions of angels to deliver?

One has to keep in mind that he rebuked Peter for cutting the ear off the Roman soldier, but was that only because Jesus did not want Peter to thwart his plans?

Why would Paul make up a story about rebuking Peter?

Levi steps in to defend her and rebuke Peter, Peter remains in the grasp of anger, which his soul must overcome before it enters the heavenly realm, according to the vision - report.

He rebukes Peter.

Not exact matches

Our understanding of salvation expanded through the epistles and even Peter was rebuked for some of his behavior via Paul.

Peter was rebuked for wanting a Satanic Messiah, and the church has made the same mistake.

Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.»

In an address that is hard not to read as a rebuke of the Roman Curia, Pope Francis delivered a searching reflection on pastoral ministry to a gathering of Italian bishops at St. Peter's Basilica this evening.

Peter rebuked Jesus for talking about suffering and death.

The basis for that rebuke was that Peter was not «mindful» of the things of God, but of man.

Peter was a believer in Christ, yet Jesus rebuked him with «Get thee behind me, Satan.»

In the course of the meal, Jesus rebuked Judas, who would betray him, and Peter, who, despite his grandiloquent profession of loyalty, would deny him.

These fears may well have been borne out by Paul's rebuke of Peter, when Peter went back on his tentative multicultural convictions out of fear of rebuke from the powerful Jewish establishment (Gal.

But joined together, they can produce the power to wash feet and sustain Peter's rebuke; to live fully today because God is in the present as well as in the tomorrow, and to work for the impossible because with God all things are finally possible.

Peter rebukes Jesus for this — not because of any possible suffering for himself, but because of the possibility that Jesus will suffer.

Peter understands the rebuke and turns around to go back to Rome and his own impending crucifixion.

I was shocked a few weeks ago, to read in Matthew 14 Christ's rebuke of Peter.

Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him.

As far as I can tell, Jesus calls him Simon whenever Jesus is about to rebuke him, Peter whenever Jesus is proud of him and Simon Peter whenever he is living up to his potential.

In this same chapter, Simon (the sorcerer) believed and followed Phillip and was baptized by water... yet he was rebuked by Peter, in much the same way that Jesus rebukes the church in Laodicia, for thinking he could buy the gifts of the Spirit with money.

Just like Peter unwittingly thought he was serving God and had to be rebuked by Jesus, I Just wonder if the evil one and his minions do a little celebration dance whenever people spew this anti-knowledge stuff.

Philip baptized Simon Magus, whose guileful declaration of faith was so soon exploded by the stern rebuke of Peter.

Matthew 16:22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.

Is Mark suggesting that this was Peter's way around the rebuke he had earlier received from Jesus?

Furthermore, Peter also rebuked the hearers at Pentecost who said that the tongues speakers who were actually filled with the Holy Spirit were drunk, and corrects them, (Acts 2:13 - 21) but does not say they had spoken against the Holy Ghost.

Peter would then surely have heard a rebuke he had heard once before: «Get behind me, Satan.»

Jesus clearly knew, and His disciples seemed to understand (especially after learning from the rebuke of Peter), that Jesus did not want them to use their swords for violence.

In the first and third cases he is rebuked by Jesus, and in the second Jesus predicts that far from dying with him, Peter will deny he even knows Jesus.

Shadow Welsh Secretary Peter Hain was rebuked by Labour bosses yesterday after accusing the BBC of political bias in its coverage of the royal wedding.

Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams seemed to rebuke NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton on the airwaves this morning for labeling the shooting death of Akai Gurley at the hands of Officer Peter Liang in the stairwell of a Brooklyn housing project as «an accident.»