Now, fire away with irrelevant comments about the bad things people have done in the name of Christ, the false comparisons to Egyptian myth, and the other silly
rebutals of hopeless secularism.
That initial arrogance suggests to me he will not listen to
rebutals in any event.
Now, totalitarianism would be if 1 single individual, had decided what health care would cover, and mandated that everyone would follow the ruling, without any input or chance
for rebutal / change from any other party.
A poor strawman
argument rebutal from David Wojick: «CO2 does not re-emit the photons that it absorbs.»
It is so dense with cherry picks, data taken out of context and other errors that it would take a paper just as long simply to provide links to
related rebutals.
How can anyone trust this group of «scientists» if they are unable to apply widely available technology that allows for document comparisons in less time than it takes to write a blog
post rebutal that includes possible criminal accusations?
I'm pretty impressed with
the rebutals some have put up.
He is to stupid / lazy / dishonest to answer
your rebutal.
Note: these results have been incorporated into
the rebutal to the myth «Medieval Warm Period was warmer.»
Seriously, the rights of
rebutal to a chosen colour is hidden from the average tailor - client relationship.