In March 2009, Obama made it possible for researchers to
receive federal funding for research on more than 75 different hESC lines.
Not exact matches
Biomedical
research productivity perhaps has fallen because after
receiving a large infusion of
federal funding in the past decade it may take time
for new or expanded
research efforts to become efficient.
The NSF / SRS
Federal Funds for Research and Development surveys for 1998 estimate federal contributions to universities and colleges to total more than $ 15 billion, which is almost 60 % of all research funds that academic institutions received tha
Federal Funds for Research and Development surveys for 1998 estimate federal contributions to universities and colleges to total more than $ 15 billion, which is almost 60 % of all research funds that academic institutions received that
Funds for Research and Development surveys for 1998 estimate federal contributions to universities and colleges to total more than $ 15 billion, which is almost 60 % of all research funds that academic institutions received th
Research and Development surveys
for 1998 estimate
federal contributions to universities and colleges to total more than $ 15 billion, which is almost 60 % of all research funds that academic institutions received tha
federal contributions to universities and colleges to total more than $ 15 billion, which is almost 60 % of all
research funds that academic institutions received th
research funds that academic institutions received that
funds that academic institutions
received that year.
Under these policies,
research done with only 21 of the original hESC lines would be eligible
for federal funding, while work done with other, newly generated hESC lines would
receive no
federal funding (although that
research could still
receive private
funding).
Research ranging from Latin poetry to neuroethics at the University of British Columbia has
received an $ 8.5 million boost in
federal funding for eight professors appointed or renewed as Canada
Research Chairs.
Since the mid-1970s a few members of Congress from both parties have allied themselves with the largest beneficiaries of
federal research contracts (the labs and centers) and ensured that these organizations
receive a substantial portion of
federal education
funding for R&D.
Some TEP instructors explore issues of inclusivity, while others have
received federal funding to
research technology - based strategies
for increasing student interest in STEM topics.
The researchers,
funded by
federal grants derived from tax - payers, university donations, and donors who have lost loved ones to cancer have little to show
for the $ trillions
received for cancer
research.
The US Department of Energy (DOE) has selected 13 projects to
receive approximately $ 60 million in
federal funding for cost - shared
research and development
for advanced nuclear technologies.
As part of the
federal welfare reform of 1996, Congress recognized the need to promote responsible fatherhood as a way to support child wellbeing.2 During the 106th Congress (1999 - 2000), Congress provided
funding to the National Fatherhood Initiative (NFI), a non-profit organization that works with government agencies, the military, corrections departments, and community organizations to create fatherhood programs.3 Concurrently, Congress also provided
funding to evaluate the Institute
for Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization's fatherhood program, signaling the
federal government's commitment to
researching and assessing the impact of responsible fatherhood programs.4 Although Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama included
funding for responsible fatherhood programs in each of their budgets, it was not until the 109th Congress of 2005 - 2006 that the Healthy Marriage Promotion and Responsible Fatherhood (HMPRF) grants program was created and
funded under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 beginning in FY2006 and continuing through FY2010.5 The program was subsequently reauthorized under the Claims Resolution Act of 2010.6 The HMPRF programs support healthy marriage, responsible parenting, and economic stability activities, and are
funded through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration of Children and Families» (ACF) Office of Family Assistance (OFA).7 The HMPRF programs have continued to
receive funds through FY2016.8 Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education grantees, the New Pathways
for Fathers and Families grantees, and Responsible Fatherhood Opportunities
for Reentry and Mobility (ReFORM) grantees are currently
funded from FY2015 through FY2020.9