Sentences with phrase «receive less state funding»

Albany officials often lament that the capital city is held to a more rigorous standard than others — that if Albany has a surplus, or increases its tax base, it should therefore receive less state funding.
«Westchester County receives less state funding per student than any other county in New York State,» Killian said.

Not exact matches

«Mr. Speaker, today in First Nations communities across the country, the unemployment rate can reach 80 %, half of the housing units are in a pitiful state and schools and students receive 30 % less funding than others,» Thomas Mulcair reported.
Red States overwhelmingly receive more federal funds than they pay in federal taxes, while Blue States tend to receive less in federal funds than they pay in federal taxes.
The suit mentions the Common Core curriculum, noting additional federal funds districts have received through Race to the Top have constituted less than one - third of the amount needed for proper implementation, and the state has so far not provided additional funds to cover that cost, or the additional costs of the new teacher performance evaluation requirements.
If the US government is not providing the same degree of federal funding to territories as states has any study been done comparing the degree of taxes payed in vs federal funds payed to the territories and if so generally is the US receiving more, about equal, or less in taxes as it's providing in services to these territories?
According to the report, 28 percent or 189 school districts in New York state receive less funding now than they did in 2008.
Titled The State of America's National Parks, the report warns that prehistoric and historic sites, including battlefields, are suffering primarily because they receive less attention and funding than do parks known for their natural beauty.
Because parish members receive a discount on their tuition, a voucher student whose family belongs to the church nets the school $ 1,700 less in state funds than if they were nonmembers.
Schools in these «reformed» districts would continue to receive public funding, but they would have to meet only the state's requirements for private schools, which are less stringent than those for public schools.
Baltimore City currently receives 25 percent of the state's Title I funds, even though it has slightly less, 23 percent, of the state's eligible children.
In previous work, one of us found that Washington State's 2004 compensatory allocation formula ensured that affluent Bellevue School District, in which only 18 percent of students qualify for free or reduced - price lunch, receives $ 1,371 per poor student in state compensatory funds, while large urban districts received less than half of that for each of their impoverished students (see FigurState's 2004 compensatory allocation formula ensured that affluent Bellevue School District, in which only 18 percent of students qualify for free or reduced - price lunch, receives $ 1,371 per poor student in state compensatory funds, while large urban districts received less than half of that for each of their impoverished students (see Figurstate compensatory funds, while large urban districts received less than half of that for each of their impoverished students (see Figure 2).
The seven largest districts in Ohio would each have received $ 20 to $ 160 million less in state funds had they operated under the charter school funding formula.
Washington — Five states no longer require school districts to keep records showing that they do not allocate less local funding to schools receiving federal Chapter 1 funds, and 31 other states have relaxed standards by which they judge «comparability,» according to the General Accounting Office.
Even though charter schools and district schools receive equal funding from the state, charters generally receive less funding per student.
In addition, Syracuse is one of the most under - funded districts in New York state, with city schools receiving $ 4,455 less per student than they would have received under the 2007 - 08 state budget agreement.
MPS students currently receive $ 1,000 + less per pupil in state funding when compared to their surrounding suburban colleagues.
For a new program in the first year of implementation only, a program operating less than a full school year will receive state funds on a fractional basis determined by the pro rata portion of the school year the program is provided.
In more than half of the states, there are hundreds of high - poverty schools that receive less funding than schools that serve more - affluent students.
As a state charter school we receive substantially less funding per student than the typical public school.
Through the Race to the Top initiative, for example, the Obama administration succeeded in incentivizing states: Even with relatively small pots of money — just $ 4 billion, or less than 2 percent of federal education spending — the administration encouraged states to prioritize innovative teacher and principal reforms and develop rigorous academic standards.22 Thirty - four states modified their policies in response to the federal initiative, even though only 19 states received federal funding to do so.23
Schools receive the largest amount of their state funding through a general fund that distributes money through a formula that gives more to districts with more students with challenges, including those who live in poverty, and less state money to districts with high property values.
Although we do receive funds from the state, we receive less funding than schools in our local school district.
The Center for Education Reform has found that the average charter school receives $ 3,468 less in state and federal funds than traditional public schools.
The amount of money parents receive through Alabama's credit is less than the average funding parents receive through private school choice programs in other states.
So schools with a physical location in wealthier areas like metro Atlanta could probably receive the state average funding while those in lower - income areas would likely be eligible for less.
This followed an earlier study from the department finding that «many high - poverty schools receive less than their fair share of state and local funding... leav (ing) students in high - poverty schools with fewer resources than schools attended by their wealthier peers.»
Unlike some voucher programs, LSP is «double targeted,» Wolf said; in order to be eligible for the funds, a student's family must make less than 250 percent above the federal poverty level — approximately $ 61,500 for a family of four — and be enrolled in a public school receiving a letter grade of «C» or below according to state standards.
The money we receive from state funding is approximately $ 5,000 less per student than the amount surrounding high schools receive from local tax dollars.
Across the state, charter school children receive less funding for their education than children in district schools, resulting in a gap of thousands less per child per year.
On average, school districts serving predominantly low - income students already receive significantly less state and local funding than others.
At the same time, a group of struggling public schools, targeted for state intervention and state funding, called The Commissioners Network will receive $ 4.7 million less than they received this year.
State - level disparities between average district and charter school per - pupil funding ranged from 0.1 percent in Tennessee (meaning that, on average, Tennessee charter schools receive slightly more per - pupil funding than district schools) to -58.4 percent in Louisiana (meaning that on average Louisiana charter schools receive less than half the per - pupil funding that district schools receive).
In district - level analysis, the Education Trust finds that nationally districts serving high concentrations of low - income students receive on average $ 1,200 less in state and local funding than districts that serve low concentrations of low - income students, and that gap widens to $ 2,000 when comparing high - minority and low - minority districts.17 These findings are further reflected by national funding equity measures reported by Education Week, which indicate that wealthy school districts spend more per student than poorer school districts do on average.18
The less property wealth a district has, the more state funds it receives.
A recent analysis of 30 states and the District of Columbia found that funding disparities between charter and district schools grew more than 54 percent between 2003 and 2011.72 In FY 2011, charter schools on average received $ 3,500 less per pupil than district schools, a difference of 28 percent.
Participating postsecondary institutions receive state funds, in the lesser amount of either tuition and fees or the state per pupil expenditure through the BEP, less a $ 200 records fee.
This fact alone is shocking — how can it be that receiving federal funds designed to increase adoption made it less likely that a state is using those assessments six years later?
Though scholars such as Matthew M. Chingos have asserted that in the grand scheme of things, funding for state tests is a miniscule portion of the total amount spent on K - 12 public education, I wonder how the cost of switching state exams will impact districts that receive disproportionately less in state aid.
School districts with the highest rates of poverty receive about $ 1,000 less per student in state and local funding than those with the lowest rates of poverty, according to a new report released Tuesday by The Education Trust.
Indiana has no financial reporting requirements for private schools that receive public funds, leaving taxpayers with less oversight and accountability than with the state's public schools.
The TPP supplemental foundation aid in FY 2017 was intended to guarantee that districts do not receive less funding (state foundation aid and TPP replacement) than FY 2015 levels.
State funds received based on the average daily attendance of students, resulting in $ 1200 less in total revenue per pupil than traditional public schools
CHS receives no funding from the state or federal government, and town contracts make up less than seven percent of what it costs to run the shelter.
Yet the schools these children attend receive less than their fair share of state or federal funding, according to a 2011 report published by the US Department of Education.
According to Buterin, contributors to the Ethereum project are able to receive funds in ETH, BTC or CHF, though he was less clear about how such payments interacted with cryptocurrency markets, stating that ETH payments had not yet «touched primary ether markets».
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z