Sentences with phrase «received less investment»

Even though parks in communities such as Mott Haven are arguably more important to residents, they received less investment in the past, de Blasio said.

«We do find that more restrictive countries tend to receive less investment.»

Not exact matches

Assuming I got along with both CEOs and enjoyed working with either of them equally, but the number of women - led ventures receiving venture investment was still disproportionately less than their male counterparts, I would probably invest in the venture led by a female CEO.

investment management professionals (43 %) receive more than half of their compensation based on their annual performance; similarly, nearly 80 % of investment management professionals surveyed have less than half of their compensation based on longer - term performance measures.

Due to the equitizing, the Fund expects to receive less gross income on a go - forward basis from this investment.

The rate you receive if you hold an ARS until its final maturity could be less than what could have been earned on comparable long - term investments.

Since 2004, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets have gone 84 - 65 for +14.6 units and a 9.8 % return on investment (ROI).

As you can see betting on teams who are receiving less than 35 % of public wagers has the highest units earned with 28.14, however the actual return on investment would be noticeably higher when that number drops below 30 %.

This year's NHL Betting Against the Public article details the profitable points for contrarian betting between 2005 and 2011, and teams receiving less than 40 % of moneyline bets had won 75.8 units, or a 1.6 % return on investment.

On the year, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets are 22 - 17 with +3.97 units won and a 10.2 % return on investment.

At the time of publication, we had found that visitors receiving less than 30 % of moneyline bets had gone 47 - 52 for +30.76 units and an astounding 31.1 % return on investment (ROI).

Since 2004, favorites of 8 or more points receiving 50 % or less of spread bets have gone 39 - 28 (58.2 %) ATS with +9.71 units earned and a +14.5 % return on investment (ROI).

In fact when we add our contrarian filter to the mix and look at home teams receiving less than 40 % of public bets, this system becomes even more advantageous with a 96 - 68 record — good for 23.28 units earned and a 14.2 % return on investment (ROI).

Since 2003, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets have gone 87 - 67 with 15.51 units earned and a 10.1 % return on investment (ROI).

Since 2003, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets have gone 86 - 66 during the regular season, resulting in a 56.6 % winning rate and a profit of 15.59 units with a 10.3 % return on investment (ROI).

This system shows that since 2004, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets in regular season games have posted a record of 86 - 65 (ATS) for a profit of +16.59 units and an 11 % return on investment (ROI).

According to our BetLabs software, road teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers have gone 100 - 136 on the year, which is good for +14.87 units and a 6.3 % return on investment (ROI).

Teams receiving less than 30 % of moneyline tickets have produced a -1.2 % return on investment (ROI) in smaller games and a +0.9 % ROI in heavily bet games.

According to BetLabs, since 2005 teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers have gone 843-1218 for +80.58 units and a 3.9 % return on investment (ROI) during the regular season.

Even though the return on investment (ROI) steadily climbs as we look at increasingly one - sided public action, betting against the public isn't profitable unless the team is receiving less than 25 % of spread bets.

Since 2005, teams receiving less than 40 % of public bets have gone just 2,472 - 2,563 ATS (49.1 %) with -215.01 units lost and a -4.3 % return on investment (ROI).

Since 2005, underdogs receiving less than 30 % of moneyline tickets have gone 4,376 - 6,329 with +14.62 units won and a +0.1 % return on investment (ROI).

According to our BetLabs software, home underdogs receiving less than 30 % of moneyline wagers have earned +67.25 units since 2005 — good for a 2.2 % return on investment (ROI).

According to our BetLabs software, teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers have gone 82 - 106 for +17.70 units and a 9.4 % return on investment (ROI) during the 2012 season.

Since 2004, underdogs receiving 20 % or less of spread bets have gone 84 - 63 during the regular season, resulting in 16.56 units earned and an 11.3 % return on investment (ROI).

As you can see, despite a 41.8 % winning percentage, a $ 100 / game bettor would be up $ 9,264 betting on all teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers — good for a 4.2 % return on investment.

Even though the return on investment (ROI) steadily climbs as we look as increasingly one - sided public betting, betting against the public isn't profitable unless the underdog is receiving less than 25 % of spread bets.

As detailed in our 2011 NHL Betting Against the Public article, our historical data has found a terrific return on investment betting against the public — specifically on teams receiving less than 35 % of moneyline...

When dogs receiving less than 25 % of spread bets have lost the previous week, their return on investment (ROI) increases from 7.4 % to 10.8 %.

In fact, we quickly found that favorites receiving less than 35 % of moneyline bets have gone 279 - 187 with +46.11 units won and a 9.9 % return on investment (ROI).

Our return on investment more than doubles when we look at teams receiving less than 50 % of spread bets, however, our results are somewhat atypical as they don't improve as we examine increasingly lopsided bet games.

Over the past eleven seasons, favorites receiving less than 50 % of moneyline bets had gone 2,784 - 2,359 (54.1 %) but with a -1.3 % return on investment.

Between 2005 and 2010, teams receiving less than 30 % of moneyline bets at our contributing sportsbooks posted a 1.6 % return on investment (ROI) over 5000 + games.

Since 2005, teams receiving less than 30 % of moneyline tickets have gone 544 - 713 with +57.06 units won and a 4.5 % return on investment (ROI) in games that start at 10 PM eastern or later.

This season, underdogs receiving less than 30 % of spread bets have gone 20 - 10 for +9.29 units earned and a lucrative 31 % return on investment (ROI).

Teams receiving less than 35 % of moneyline bets have produced a 0.9 % return on investment, but it's only when looking at favorites with low totals that the returns skyrocket.

The best professional learning for teachers helps them acquire, practice, and apply new skills to better serve their students.2 But despite annual investments of $ 18 billion by federal, state, and local agencies into professional learning for educators, many teachers still do not receive the kind of professional learning that helps them grow and improve their practice.3 Less than one - quarter of teachers say that they have changed their instruction as a result of professional learning, likely in part due to the lack of a consistent professional learning strategy across states and school districts.4 Learning Forward, a nonprofit association dedicated to supporting professional learning for educators, contends that the current state of professional learning is one of «inertia.»

Along with these major investments in school choice, the Department of Education as a whole would receive 13 percent less funding than last year, a reduction of $ 9 billion.

(B) SENIOR DEBT. - Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in a case in which the Federal credit instrument is the senior debt, the Federal credit instrument shall be required to receive an investment grade rating from at least 2 rating agencies, unless the credit instrument is for an amount less than $ 75,000,000, in which case 1 rating agency opinion shall be sufficient.»

[191] If the TIFIA credit instrument is proposed as the senior debt, then it must receive two investment grade ratings, unless the total amount of the debt is less than $ 75 million, in which case only one investment grade rating is required.

Seems like the answer is the same as in any situation where one receives far less value than was promised in exchange for an investment of time and money — vote with your feet.

Though the downside is the interest will be less than what you would typically receive with a long term investment.

This means any income you receive from investments held for less than a year must be included in your taxable income for the year.

For example, over relatively long periods of time, investors in general expect to receive higher returns from stock investments (riskier) than from bond investments (less risky).

Should you accept my invitation, you'll receive access to every single recommendation, trade and high - yield investment you'll find in these nine market - beating advisories for less than $ 6 a day.

Considering that I've held WDR for less than a year and have received some dividend payouts, my WDR investment proved to have a respectable total return.

Investment advisers are required to disclose the conflict of interest that arises when an adviser receives 12b - 1 fees for a share class when a less expensive share class is available for the same fund.

A short - term, generally liquid, investment into which you invest cash and typically receive a return in 90 days or less.

In a low interest rate environment, the investor gets less cash flow in return for the same investment than she would receive if she were to invest the same amount in a high interest rate environment.

To summarize, I held this investment for two years less time, I received more dividend income and more capital appreciation that led to a total annualized rate of return of 8.8 % versus the 6.4 % annual rate of return I would have received by investing two years earlier.