Sentences with phrase «receives free or reduced price lunch»

Nearly 47 % of schools where more than three - quarters of the student population receives free or reduced price lunch require uniforms.

For the months during the study, the school district provided data for average daily participation rates, overall school enrollment, and percent of students receiving a free or reduced price lunch.

31 million American children received free or reduced price lunches in 2011 due to economic need.

Some programs, such as Connect to Compete and Internet Essentials, have already started on this work, offering low cost computers and Internet access to families of students that receive free or reduced price lunch.

At the time, state data showed that, among Indiana schools with more than 90 percent of students receiving free or reduced price lunch, Christel House had higher test scores than every other charter school and all but a handful of traditional public schools.

We are a charter school in Washington, D.C. starting our second year of middle school, with 52 % of our students receiving free or reduced price lunch.

Over the last decade, the East Irondequoit Board of Education took on the challenge of providing access to college - level work in a diverse high school in which 51 % of all students receive free or reduced priced lunch.

The Education Equality Index relies on the performance of students in every classroom that receive free or reduced price lunch (FRL) through the National School Lunch Program.

El Sol is 96 percent Latino and three quarters of the student population receives free or reduced price lunches.

At Indianapolis charter school Christel House Academy, 90 percent of students receive free or reduced price lunches and about 70 percent pass state tests.

In Indianapolis Public Schools, roughly 80 percent of students receive free or reduced price lunches, but only 45 percent of students pass state tests.

We know this because of the more than 63,500 students attending F schools in traditional public school districts, three - quarters of those children — more than 49,000 students — are poor enough to receive free or reduced price lunches.

The number of students receiving free or reduced price lunches has grown significantly, and in 2008 - 2009 44 % of our nation's students were eligible.

The recommendation is based on aggregate evaluation data generated during the application process, considering the following key elements: (1) the quality of the proposed program as measured against the criteria contained in the charter school application; (2) the substantive issues surrounding the overall feasibility and reasonableness of the application in terms of the likelihood of the opening and operation of a successful, high quality public school; (3) the degree of public support for the proposed school; and (4) the CSDE's recommendation that the SBE give preference to the applicant due to its commitment to: (a) serving students who receive free or reduced price lunch; (b) partnering with FamilyUrban Schools of Excellence, Inc., an organization with a record of operating high - quality public schools in Connecticut; (c) serving students from the Dixwell / Newhallville community, an underserved, high - need area of New Haven; and (d) operating in New Haven, a Priority School District.

Not exact matches

children from low - income households ate school breakfast for every 100 that received free or reduced - price lunch

The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced - price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch.

Overall, the researchers found students who received free or reduced - price lunches were more obese than students who did not take part in the USDA program, but the gap in obesity prevalence was much smaller in states with strict lunch standards.

Dr. Daniel Taber, the new study's lead author from the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said students who receive free or reduced - price lunches from the government tend to be more obese, but that may be due to their families» low - income status.

During the school year that ended Friday, about 84 percent of Chicago public school students received free or reduced - price breakfasts and lunches, meaning that with summer's arrival, nearly 342,000 children are no longer receiving the meals each day in their school cafeterias.

Because most of Chicago «s public schools have closed campuses and 88 percent of the children attending receive free or reduced - price lunches, Phillips is more concerned about getting the students to eat than losing them to outside competition.

That's roughly one - fourth the number of children who qualify at schools for free or reduced price lunches — widely regarded as the only nutritious meal many needy kids receive during the school year.

The USDA, which manages the NSLP, could not provide specific information about districts participating leaving program, but most that have come out publicly about dropping the program have predominantly white populations of students and have a very low percentage of students receiving free or reduced - price lunches.

As the economy struggles to regain its footing, more children than ever receive free or reduced - price lunches in the nation's school cafeterias.

As a pediatrician, it is very worrisome to me that the children most likely to be eligible to receive free or reduced - price school lunch are exactly those who are at greatest risk for obesity and Type II diabetes: Latinos and African - Americans.

If your student receives free or reduced lunch he / she has to pay the full price for extra milk and snack milk.

With 46 schools across Brooklyn, the Bronx, Manhattan, and Queens, Success Academy enrolls 15,500 students, primarily low - income children of color in disadvantaged neighborhoods: 75 % of students receive free or reduced - price lunch, 87 % are children of color, 16 % are children with disabilities, and 8 % are English language learners.

A common proxy for poverty is a student being certified to receive a free or reduced - price lunch.

After controlling for average class size, per - pupil spending in 1998 - 99, the percentage of students with disabilities, the percentage of students receiving a free or reduced - price school lunch, the percentage of students with limited English proficiency, and student mobility rates, high - scoring F schools achieved gains that were 2.5 points greater than their below - average D counterparts in reading (see Figure 2).

Roughly half of the students receive free or reduced - price lunch.

[7] In terms of the proportion of students receiving free - or reduced - price lunch, both magnet and charter schools are less impoverished than traditional public schools in their same districts in most states (exceptions include Nevada for both magnets and charters and Florida and North Carolina for magnets only).

In previous work, one of us found that Washington State's 2004 compensatory allocation formula ensured that affluent Bellevue School District, in which only 18 percent of students qualify for free or reduced - price lunch, receives $ 1,371 per poor student in state compensatory funds, while large urban districts received less than half of that for each of their impoverished students (see Figure 2).

For each school, we know the nontargeted, or noncategorical, allocations made for each student who attends the school as well as how much the school received for five targeted groups of students: students eligible for free or reduced - price lunch, students eligible for bilingual education programs, students with disabilities, gifted students, and students in vocational education programs.

Apart from their learning environment, these eight 3rd graders are just like their peers at Lee Elementary, where 77 percent receive free or reduced - priced lunch, an indicator of poverty, and many report not having computer access at home.

The school's student population is primarily African American; 85 to 90 percent of its students receive free or reduced - price lunches.

The other is students receiving free or reduced - price lunches.

In particular, we know each student's gender, ethnicity, whether they received free or reduced - price lunch through the federal lunch program, whether they were English language learners or received special education services, and their record of suspensions and absences from school.

In the year prior to entering a KIPP school, 80 percent of the KIPP students are from low - income families, as measured by eligibility for free or reduced - price school breakfast and lunch (FRPL); 96 percent are either black or Hispanic; 7 percent are English language learners; and 7 percent receive special education services (see Figure 1a).

The students in grades 2 through 6 in the district are predominantly white (73 percent), with a sizable ethnic minority (Latino students compose 21 percent of the elementary population); 48 percent of them receive a free or reduced - price lunch.

Almost half the students receive free or reduced - price lunch, and 16 percent are English learners, primarily Sudanese and Somali refugees.

Scope: Comparative data about class size, proficiency on standardized tests, percentage of students who receive free or reduced - price school lunch, and proportion of first - year teachers at a school; there's also a forum for parents to write reviews about individual schools.

In 2013 — 14, 77 percent of Success students received free or reduced - price lunch, compared with 79 percent for city schools overall; 12 percent of Success students received special education services, compared with 18 percent for the city; 4 percent of Success students were English - language learners (ELL), compared with 13 percent for the city.

On average across all schools, 83 percent of students received free or reduced - price lunch.

Besides eliminating the problem of children fumbling through their pockets for change or losing their money on the playground, the system also protects the privacy of youngsters receiving free - and reduced - price lunches.

All live in poverty; 100 percent of the students receive free or reduced - priced lunches.

Seventy - seven percent of Icahn students receive free or reduced - price lunch, compared with 79 percent for city schools overall; 6 percent of Icahn students receive special - education services, compared with 17 percent for the city; 5 percent of Icahn students are English - language learners (ELL), compared with 14 percent for the city.

About 75 percent of Ferraro's students receive free or reduced - price lunches, and about one - third speak English as a second language.

Over 90 percent of the roughly 800 students receive free or reduced - price lunch, and 90 percent have identifiable trauma in their backgrounds.

The principal did some research and learned that the students reported for fighting were receiving free or reduced - price lunches, and thought the families might not be able to afford certain hygiene products.

For the vast majority of public schools, approval to receive free and / or reduced - price lunches (FRPL) has been the sole, or at least the primary, indicator of low family income under Title I.

Some districts, such as Hillsborough, distribute a flat amount of $ 500 for each child who is eligible to receive free and reduced - price lunch, regardless of total school poverty or grade level.