Sentences with phrase «receiving less points»

VTL 1110 (a) and its consequences are much more preferable to a NY speeding ticket and its hefty fine and point total.In addition, if this is the only offense you have on your record, your insurance rates can not be increased, which would be the case with a single speeding ticket.Moreover, due to receiving less points, it is unlikely that you will have your driver's license suspended (due to having too many points on your license) or to be driving on an already suspended license.Note that if you live in a state other than New York, a skilled attorney may be able to negotiate your offense down to a violation that carries 0 points in your home state.

Not exact matches

But the best thing to do is to get to the point quickly, so as to minimize the pain inflicted on those receiving the (less - than - desirable) update.

Lead author of the study and Babson professor Donna Kelley points to studies that show women are less likely to receive venture capital funding.

Let's say you do want to give (or hint strongly that you'd like to receive) a monetary gift, but not cash — something more interesting, less likely to be spent idly, and with a chance of growing at more than zero - point - something percent.

According to some sources, such as Myers, even though meat production in Costa Rica tripled during the period 1960 - 70 internal consumption fell to a point where each person ate «less meat than a domestic cat receives annually in the United States» (Myers 1981, 6).

But Richard A. Shenk points out in his new book, The Virgin Birth of Christ: The Rich Meaning of a Biblical Truth, that in Evangelical churches, the why of the virgin birth receives less attention than the fact of it.

Points one and three typically received less elaboration than point two.

You receive one reward point for every pound spent, so simply redeem next time you shop to stay fuelled for less.

This year's NHL Betting Against the Public article details the profitable points for contrarian betting between 2005 and 2011, and teams receiving less than 40 % of moneyline bets had won 75.8 units, or a 1.6 % return on investment.

Sacramento also fits into a key filter of ours mentioned in this season's Betting Against the Public article, getting 10 + points on the road while receiving less than 35 % of bets.

Since 2004, favorites of 8 or more points receiving 50 % or less of spread bets have gone 39 - 28 (58.2 %) ATS with +9.71 units earned and a +14.5 % return on investment (ROI).

When filtering the data down to strictly home teams receiving less than 20 % of spread bets, I was wondering what the winning percentage was for home dogs getting 7 or more points that are receiving less than 20 % of spread bets?

Although it may look like public money has caused this one - point move, the total receives roughly three times less action than the spread for the typical NBA game.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

The Bulldogs have never received less than 21 % of spread tickets, which happened when they closed as 31 - point favorites against Loyola Marymount back on February 11, 2008 (they won 83 - 50).

It's also worth pointing out that, since 2005, Gonzaga has gone 6 - 6 ATS when they're receiving less than 50 % of spread tickets and 5 - 12 ATS in all other NCAA Tournament games.

For example, knowing that teams receiving less than 30 % of public bets is valuable information, however, if you only examined the specific data points (i.e. 17 %) with the highest units won, you could create a system with a greater ROI but you wouldn't have learned anything particularly valuable — especially considering that the public betting percentage could move a single point after placing your bet, thus falling out of your system.

Although there have been very few preseason games with a full point of reverse line movement on a team that's receiving less than 35 % of spread bets, teams fitting those criteria have covered at a nearly 67 % clip.

Over the past decade, there have only been 87 games where a home underdog of at least 10 - points has seen at least a 1 - point reverse line movement while receiving less than 25 % of spread bets.

In fact, since 2003 there have been just 43 games in which the favorite of 3 + points received less than 35 % of spread bets.

As you can see, when a team is receiving less than 40 % of spread bets and there is at least 1.5 - points of reverse line movement, they have produced a 60 - 39 ATS record with 19.27 units won.

Since February 1, 2010, visiting teams receiving less than 35 % of public bets and getting 10 or more points have gone 43 - 20 (68.25 %) with 20.89 units earned.

Ole Miss closed with just 25 % of spread tickets, pushing coach Hugh Freeze's career ATS record to 8 - 0 when receiving less than 30 % of spread tickets, covering by an average of 9.88 points per game.

Not only does this prove our original hypothesis, but it also indicates that small underdogs (6.5 points or less) receiving less than 20 % of spread bets have been a terrible value for bettors.

As you can see, 4.5 - point favorites receiving less than 40 % of spread bets have been extremely lucrative.

Since 2005 road dogs of 10.5 + points that are receiving less than 40 % of spread bets have gone 2,038 - 1,886 ATS for +54.59 units.

Our research found that out of 8,958 teams that closed as favorites of at least 4.5 - points, only 401 received less than 40 % of spread bets.

Incredibly, the first profitable data point for betting against the public on the under comes on teams receiving 21 % of public bets or less (54 - 50, +3.41 units).

When an underdog of 3.5 + points is receives less than 30 % of spread bets, they have gone 7 - 4 ATS.

-- Via our Bet Labs software: College football home favorites receiving less than 30 % of spread bets have gone 40 - 29 for +9.1 units and a 13.2 % ROI since 2005 and Illinois almost fit that criteria before closing at 31 % as a 3 - point favorite (Won and covered).

This is also interesting because underdogs receiving less than 50 % of spread bets with reverse line movement of at least a half - point have gone 11 - 3 ATS (+7.74 units.

In fact, since 2003 no home dog of 10 + points has ever received less than 12 % of spread bets (Minnesota on 10/23/11 and St. Louis on 10/25/09).

-- Historically, teams receiving less than 40 % of bets have gone 8 - 2 ATS in the Elite 8, covering by an average of 5.75 points per game.

Since 2005, favorites of 8 + points have gone 38 - 26 ATS (+9.85 units) during the #NBAPlayoffs when receiving less than 50 % of spread bets.

Using our Bet Labs software, we found the favorites of at least 4.5 - points have gone 278 - 199 ATS (58.3 %) when they receive less than 40 % of spread bets.

Of the 32 Game 7's since 2005, only 1 team has received less than 30 % of bets (Pistons won by 18 as 8.5 - point favorites over Cavs in 2006).

Underdogs of more than five points receiving less than 50 % of spread tickets have gone 738-703-32 (51.2 %) ATS in the regular season.

However, for those of us who continue breastfeeding beyond that point, we're usually on the receiving end of some less than supportive commentary.

In the interview, de Blasio pointed out his predecessors — Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg — received considerably less heat over the program's renewal.

The two Republican committees that are focused on congressional races have received $ 2.7 million from the New York area, slightly more than at this point in 2008 but less than the $ 4 million they raised at this point in the 2004 cycle when the party still controlled Congress.

Ethics reforms received less billing in the past, with Cuomo simply pointing to his 2011 creation of the Joint Commission on Public Ethics.

According to reports prepared by the Council of Ontario Universities (COU), although the level of provincial government funding to universities in all 10 provinces has steadily declined since 1988, it has declined fastest in Ontario, to the point at which Ontario's universities receive 22 % less per student than universities in the other nine provinces.

For grants submitted three or more times, we found no significant difference in award probability between blacks and whites; however, Asians remained almost 4 percentage points less likely to receive an R01 award (P <.05).

For all applicants who received F or T training, blacks were 27.4 percentage points (P <.001), Asians were 6.9 percentage points (P <.01), and Hispanics were 9.5 percentage points (P <.01) less likely to ever receive an R01 award compared with whites.

The study showed that children who had been more distressed as infants and had received less physical contact had a molecular profile in their cells that was underdeveloped for their age — pointing to the possibility that they were lagging biologically.

For an adolescent participant whose most educated parent received a bachelor's degree, the odds of completing a MOOC with enough points to receive a certificate were roughly 1.75 times those of an otherwise similar adolescent in the same course whose most educated parent held less than a bachelor's.

Compared with children who were diagnosed with ADHD but did not receive medication, those who took medication were 3.6 percentage points less likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease, 7.3 percentage points less likely to have a substance - abuse disorder and 2.3 percentage points less likely to be injured.

You receive one reward point for every pound spent, so simply redeem next time you shop to stay fuelled for less.

As in most cases, our general practitioner expressed some mild concern but continued with the wait - and - see approach until she was almost two and her expressive speech was less than five words, at which point we received a referral to public health for a speech assessment.