The «hybridization» of home schooling has, along with other choice mechanisms and
recent Establishment Clause interpretation, blurred the line between government and private educational spheres.
Not exact matches
Recent attempts to use the
establishment clause as an engine of secularity have had some effect, but such attempts rely on distortions of both the past and present, and in themselves are no more «religiously neutral» than the generalized acceptance of Christian dominance that preceded them.
But in many
recent cases they have tended to agree more readily on another thesis: that the free - exercise
clause does not interpose protections of religious obligations and practices that it once did (from 1940 to 1981), and that the
establishment clause does not have the, force against government action that it once did (from 1948 to 1985)
In
recent years the courts have been especially sensitive to the
establishment clause, and in doing so they have greatly narrowed the definition of free expression.
In the most
recent form of this debate, the courts have ruled that Creation - Science is not science but the propagation of particular religious beliefs, and as such the mandatory requirement of it being taught in public schools violates the
establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.