«There's been a lot of interest in these issues, particularly in light of
the recent federal court decision in Mississippi,» says Robert Saunier, the newly elected president of ARELLO.
The recent Federal Court decision in De Rose also demonstrates this trend towards limiting the recognition of Indigenous relationships to land.
The recent Federal Court decision in De Rose [64] also provides direction on these issues.
They cited
the recent Federal Court decision of Khadr v. Canada, [2009] F.C.J. No. 462, which came out last April,
The Ottawa Citizen is reporting on this (Spy agency admits it spies on Canadians «incidentally») as well as
the recent Federal Court decision that found CSIS and Department of Justice lawyers deliberately misled the Court in order to obtain warrants.
A recent Federal Court decision that addressed allegations of bias by an adjudicator hearing a case under the unjust dismissal provisions of the Canada Labour Code provides more comfort to adjudicators who engage in med - arb.
A recent federal court decision provides a cautionary tale about the rights of resident physicians accused of misconduct, and importance of taking full advantage of internal «due process» hearings.
The Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL) and Canadian Council for Refugees (CCR) welcome
the recent Federal Court decision clarifying that the refugee appeal is a full appeal on the merits.
Some of the answers to that question have been provided in
the recent Federal Court decision on refugee health cuts.
A recent Federal Court decision on damages considered whether non-infringing alternatives to the defendant's infringing activities should be considered.
This comes in the wake of
a recent federal court decision being appealed to the Supreme Court that rolls back federal regulations to reduce HFCs.
He also calls on the egg industry to review free range claims following
a recent Federal Court decision.
Not exact matches
An Indian generic drug company on Monday urged a
federal appeals
court to reconsider a
recent decision that revived a patent infringement case against Google LLC, saying the ruling could spur «vexatious lawsuits» by makers of brand - name pharmaceutical products.
The Recording Industry of America on Monday urged a
federal appeals
court to reconsider a
recent decision upholding a $ 5.3 million judgment against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for copying a Marvin Gaye song to create their 2013 smash «Blurred Lines.»
According to the
Federal Court's recent decision in Taseko Mines Ltd v Canada (Environment), «a project of such magnitude as the one considered in the present case [an open - pit gold and copper mine in British Columbia] will likely have impacts in areas of both provincial and federal responsibility.
Federal Court's
recent decision in Taseko Mines Ltd v Canada (Environment), «a project of such magnitude as the one considered in the present case [an open - pit gold and copper mine in British Columbia] will likely have impacts in areas of both provincial and
federal responsibility.
federal responsibility.»
The ACCC has applied to the
Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal's
recent Tabcorp / Tatts merger authorisation
decision.
A self - deprecating NCAA is a welcome switch from the previously smug organization that has only been moved to meaningful action in the
recent past by
federal court decisions (the ban on cost - of - attendance stipends became illegal once the NCAA got whipped in O'Bannon vs. NCAA) and terrible PR (Connecticut guard Shabazz Napier made the schools look silly with their food rules by speaking out during a tournament that makes $ 770 million a year for the NCAA in television revenue, hence the unlimited meals rule change).
As Maggie Haberman reports, de Blasio has had discussions in
recent weeks with Google on the heels of his successful effort to get Goldman Sachs to agree not to spend on political ads in this election cycle — even though a
recent US Supreme
Court decision allows corporations to drop unlimited amounts of cash to try to elect of defeat candidates running for
federal office.
The Justice Department said in a statement, «After carefully considering the Supreme
Court's
recent decision and the principles of
federal prosecution, we have made the
decision not to pursue the case further.»
Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a
federal appeals
court in Manhattan that the
recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.
MANHATTAN
FEDERAL COURT — Former state Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is fighting to stay out of prison while he appeals his corruption conviction — a pending appeal that he's likely to win thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, his lawyers argue in court papers filed this
COURT — Former state Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is fighting to stay out of prison while he appeals his corruption conviction — a pending appeal that he's likely to win thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, his lawyers argue in court papers filed this
COURT — Former state Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is fighting to stay out of prison while he appeals his corruption conviction — a pending appeal that he's likely to win thanks to a
recent U.S. Supreme
Court decision, his lawyers argue in court papers filed this
Court decision, his lawyers argue in court papers filed this
Court decision, his lawyers argue in
court papers filed this
court papers filed this
court papers filed this week.
Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a
federal appeals
court in Manhattan on Monday that the
recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.
ALBANY —
Federal prosecutors, citing a
recent US Supreme
Court decision, have conceded for the first time that last year's conviction of former state Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno on two felony counts must be dismissed, The Post has learned.
Federal prosecutors argue in
court papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDon
court papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme
Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDon
Court's
recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.
But the mayor appears to have benefited from a high burden of proof for
federal corruption cases — made higher by a
recent U.S. Supreme
Court decision — and from the legal advice of his campaign attorney, who structured the Senate contributions to conform to the letter, if not the spirit, of state fundraising laws.
In a Journal News op - ed, Lawrence Norden and Frederick A.O Schwarz of the Brennan Center, wrote that Governor Cuomo's refusal to pass meaningful reform in the state budget was especially disheartening in light of the U.S. Supreme
Court's
recent decision in McCutcheon v.
Federal Election Commission.
Dear Government of Austria, Government of Lower Austria and City of Vienna, The international climate community applauds the
recent decision by the
Federal administrative
court in Vienna to block the expansion of Vienna airport as incompatible with Austria's climate obligations.
In light of the
recent Hannah Poling
decision, in which the
federal court conceded that vaccines could have contributed to her autism, we think Followers, 585 Following, 908 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Jenny McCarthy (@jennymccarthy)
The
decision is one of several in
recent months by
federal appeals
courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.
In a more
recent decision, however, a
Federal Court of Appeals refined that definition, holding that consent is only given if the consumer provided their cellphone number at the time of the credit application.
Recent confessions released by
federal courts indicate that corruption from the construction companies involved financed the last two presidential election campaigns, thus providing a rationale for detachment of
decisions from normal economic logic.
Their lawsuit contends that the new
decision to look at trophy hunting on case - by - case basis should be thrown out because it goes against a
recent federal appeals
court ruling requiring a public comment period on new rules.
With Justice Cromwell's surprise
decision to resign this September, the
Federal Liberals promising reform of Supreme
Court appointments, and
recent media discussion around the political edges of judicial appointments, The Law Society of BC yesterday offered recommendations to Justice Minister Jody Wilson - Raybould promoting four core principles for the judicial appointment process.
As the
federal government moves to limit judicial discretion in the sentencing of violent crimes, a
recent decision from the British Columbia
Court of Appeal has reasserted the court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the c
Court of Appeal has reasserted the
court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the c
court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the
courtcourt.
In the
recent decision of Dennis v Canada, the
Federal Court upheld the principle of the «no - costs» approach for plaintiffs who wish to discontinue an action under Rule 334.39 (1) of the
Federal Court Rules (the «Rules»).
And while the amounts awarded by the
Federal Court have historically been modest,
recent decisions suggest the reversal of this trend, making Canada a more attractive forum for enforcing patent rights.
A
recent decision Federal Court decision involving the manufacturer of Tupperware, Dart Industries Inc. v. Baker & McKenzie LLP, considered whether trade - mark use occurred when goods are purchased online using flyers.
A
recent decision of the
Federal Court [1] explicitly and repeatedly criticized a lottery ticket patentee for taking a «remarkable» «breathtaking» position on construction in an infringement action that was «entirely opposite» with prior representations to the Canadian Patent Office.
A
recent decision of the
Federal Court in Novartis v Teva 2013 FC 283 («Novartis»)[under appeal A-123-13] has established that the relevant date for patent sufficiency is not until the publication date.
The ACCC has applied to the
Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal's
recent Tabcorp / Tatts merger authorisation
decision.
We have previously blogged about solitary confinement in Canada and are revisiting this issue given the
recent decision from the B.C. Supreme
Court striking down sections of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act («CCRA») that permit prolonged and indefinite solitary confinement in
federal prisons.
The
recent Supreme
Court decision in Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte, 2014 SCC 55, is a helpful clarification of the applicability of consumer protection legislation and, more generally, the current principles regulating the separation of
federal and provincial powers in Canada.
The new Liberal government asked the Supreme
Court of Canada today for a six - month delay in applying its
decision on physician - assisted suicide because of the
recent federal election.
There are some
recent decisions of the
Federal Court that acknowledge the necessity of using online legal research sources and seem positioned to allow law firms to charge reasonable disbursements for them.
The article notes a
recent Supreme
Court case, Board of Education v. Tom F. that let stand a
decision permitting a wealthy parent to obtain reimbursement for private school education under
federal law, even where the parent did not give the public school an opportunity to address the child's needs and immediately places the child in private school.
He had many notable successes — in the
Court's
recent series of
decisions related to the war on terror; in limiting
federal preemption of state law (Wyeth v. Levine); upholding
federal campaign finance laws (McConnell v. FEC); and in the environmental area (Massachusetts v. EPA).
A
recent decision of the
Federal Court of Appeal may create challenges for employers in discharging their obligation to conduct periodic inspections of the work place.
It also noted the attorney, in a rebuttal, cited «a [then]
recent federal appeals
court decision holding that law firm ads showing space aliens and lawyers running at breakneck speeds did not violate ethics rules.»
In this vein, the
recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA)
decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers... [more]
A
recent Federal Court of Canada
decision, Native Council of Nova Scotia v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FC 72 (CanLII), also looked at the long form census.