Sentences with phrase «recent appeals court ruling»

Recent appeals court ruling supports student loan discharge in bankruptcy.

A recent appeals court ruling supported discharge of student loans in bankruptcy.

A recent appeals court ruling found that school districts weren't under the jurisdiction of the New York State Division of Human Rights.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

A recent appeal court ruling highlights the flaws in a fault - based divorce system, says Ed Heaton

Divorce settlements are back under the spotlight following a recent Appeal Court ruling that an ex-wife should have her monthly maintenance payments increased by a third, 15 years after her divorce.

A recent appeal court ruling recognises this.

A recent appeal court ruling has stated that whole life sentences can still be imposed by judges in England and Wales for the most serious cases of murder.

Not exact matches

That's important, because a recent appeals court decision ruled that the FTC could not regulate such companies» non-utility services, either.

In a recent court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijcourt case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijCourt of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.

An Indian generic drug company on Monday urged a federal appeals court to reconsider a recent decision that revived a patent infringement case against Google LLC, saying the ruling could spur «vexatious lawsuits» by makers of brand - name pharmaceutical products.

Interviewed by Jeff Gray of The Globe and Mail concerning a recent Court of Appeal ruling involving breach of fiduciary duty, June 18, 2014.

Orland Park plans to appeal a recent Illinois Appellate Court ruling awarding Orland Hills 25 acres that both villages wanted to annex.

He's particularly disappointed by a recent court of appeal ruling in the US which knocked down the principle of net neutrality.

Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's appeal has gained some ground in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo in public corruption cases.

An appeals court tossed out that conviction, citing a recent Supreme Court ruling that changed the legal boundaries for public corrupcourt tossed out that conviction, citing a recent Supreme Court ruling that changed the legal boundaries for public corrupCourt ruling that changed the legal boundaries for public corruption.

Earlier this month, Silver's lawyers argued that thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell, Silver's case, too, would likely be thrown out — and he should be allowed to stay out of prison on bail while he made his appeals case.

Suffolk County lawmakers and farmers are supporting the county's decision to appeal a recent New York State Supreme Court ruling that deems development on preserved farmland illegal.

Other positive developments include a recent ruling by the Court of Appeal allowing trial judges to explain to jurors why a victim would have delayed reporting a rape to police, helping to alleviate the influence of the rape myth.

Seminerio, who pleaded guilty to pocketing bribes through a sham consulting firm, plans to base his appeal on a recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling's conviction for «honest services» fraud.

A New York federal judge ruled Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son can stay free on bail while appealing their convictions on corruption charges, saying jury instructions in their trial could be flawed in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Caprioni saw a decent chance that Silver could win his appeal thanks to the recent Supreme Court ruling that tossed the conviction of Virginia ex-Gov.

This week, in a move that typifies the administration's recent approach, the state appealed an appellate court ruling that Indian Point is grandfathered into the state's Coastal Management Plan, which protects the wildlife habitat and recreational activities on the river.

NEW YORK (AP)-- The corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver was overturned Thursday by a federal appeals court that cited a recent Supreme Court ruling that narrowed the definition of what it takes to convict a public officourt that cited a recent Supreme Court ruling that narrowed the definition of what it takes to convict a public offiCourt ruling that narrowed the definition of what it takes to convict a public official.

Should fracking go forward in New York, a recent Court of Appeals ruling limits where it can happen.

His 2015 conviction was overturned by an appeals court due to a US Supreme Court's recent ruling that narrowed the definition of bricourt due to a US Supreme Court's recent ruling that narrowed the definition of briCourt's recent ruling that narrowed the definition of bribery.

A recent ruling by a federal appeals court may shield school districts in a growing number of states against some types of lawsuits brought against them in federal courts.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit said the policies in the New Orleans and Jefferson Parish districts could not be justified under recent Supreme Court rulings on drug testing of employees.

Mark McINERNEY of Clark Hill wrote last month that a recent Court of Appeals ruling in Summer v Southfield Board of Education that a teacher evaluation my not be challenged directly, but can challenge on the basis that the evaluation itself didn't conform with state law.

The provision seeks to reverse the recent federal appeals court ruling these parents obtained, which held that the regulation patently violated NCLB's unambiguous requirement that only fully prepared teachers be deemed «highly qualified» and that, as such, teachers still in - training must be publicly disclosed and not concentrated in low - income, high - minority schools.

Some school districts have sought creative approaches to raise additional revenue from larger parcels, but a recent Court of Appeals ruling puts those approaches in jeopardy.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DFER - LA State Director Issues Statement Following Recent 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling State Director disappointed in Court's denial of Motion for Stay Funding for Type 2 charter schools will be...

With all the attention on school layoffs this month comes a recent ruling from the California Court of Appeal further clarifying the duties of a local educational agency when it comes to distinguishing probationary» employees from «temporary» employees.»

Recent strong dissenting opinions by two D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals judges may persuade the Supreme Court to review one or more of the agency's GHG rules — or even reassess its ruling in Mass. v. EPA.

These rules are still in place for now, but may be substantially weakened or overturned completely depending upon the outcome of the appeal process to a recent DC Circuit Court decision.

The Appeals Court, in its recent ruling, disagrees.

Their lawsuit contends that the new decision to look at trophy hunting on case - by - case basis should be thrown out because it goes against a recent federal appeals court ruling requiring a public comment period on new rules.

As the federal government moves to limit judicial discretion in the sentencing of violent crimes, a recent decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal has reasserted the court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the cCourt of Appeal has reasserted the court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the ccourt's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in their sentencing recommendation to the courtcourt.

Marc Mayerson blogs that a recent ruling by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Federal Ins.

Case 2: Record company EMI has appealed a recent court ruling that the Australian band Men at Work copied a flute riff from the children's song «Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree» in their 1980s song, «Down Under.»

The recent ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the district court's decision that PharreCourt of Appeals, affirming the district court's decision that Pharrecourt's decision that Pharrell...

The recent ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the district court's decision that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's smash hit «Blurred Lines» impermissibly copied Marvin Gaye's 1977 «Got to Give It Up» has created a stir in both the legal and artistic communiCourt of Appeals, affirming the district court's decision that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's smash hit «Blurred Lines» impermissibly copied Marvin Gaye's 1977 «Got to Give It Up» has created a stir in both the legal and artistic communicourt's decision that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's smash hit «Blurred Lines» impermissibly copied Marvin Gaye's 1977 «Got to Give It Up» has created a stir in both the legal and artistic communities.

The Federal Court of Appeal had a recent opportunity to consider and provide clarity to these rules in Gilead Sciences Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health), 2012 FCA 254.

A recent ruling from the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) suggests that great care must be taken to ensure that a client has the mental capacity to make or change a will.

Share This: In a recent case, R. v. Tossounian, 2017 ONCA 618 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge did not do enough in helping a self - represented accused person at trial.

(This Blogpost is the First in a Three Part Series by Boston Injury Lawyer, Keith L. Miller, who analyzes an interesting recent U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling involving defamation, public officials and the news media.

The Ontario Court of Appeal's recent decision in Strudwick v. Applied Consumer & Clinical Evaluations Inc. («Strudwick») provides a useful clarification to all litigants, but especially those concerned with employment law matters, on the nature of various heads of damages and the general rule that «You don't get what you don't ask for.»

The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Nguyen, 2015 ONCA 278 [Nguyen] on the spousal incompetency rule has now been rendered largely moot as a result of changes to the Canada Evidence Act [CEA] brought in by the previous Harper government.

The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Tchenguiz v Imerman; Imerman v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908, [2010] All ER (D) 320 (Jul), however, has revealed the Hildebrand rules to be nothing more than a myth, condemning them as «unlawful».

That is the impact of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent refusal to hear an appeal from the state Superior Court of a ruling that gives...