Sentences with phrase «recent appeals in the case»

Not exact matches

In a recent court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.

In this most recent case the City of Burnaby was trying to get the support of the Supreme Court of British Columbia for an issue that it had already lost before the NEB and which, to put it in neutral terms, had failed to attract the interest of the Federal Court of AppeaIn this most recent case the City of Burnaby was trying to get the support of the Supreme Court of British Columbia for an issue that it had already lost before the NEB and which, to put it in neutral terms, had failed to attract the interest of the Federal Court of Appeain neutral terms, had failed to attract the interest of the Federal Court of Appeal.

Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's appeal has gained some ground in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo in public corruption cases.

Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a federal appeals court in Manhattan that the recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.

As The Guardian has outlined, a recent analogue to this case was Fiona Jones, Labour MP for Newark, who was found guilty of fraud in 1999 — although her case was overturned on appeal.

In arriving at the decision, Justice Saidu relied on the recent Court of Appeal decision in the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimeIn arriving at the decision, Justice Saidu relied on the recent Court of Appeal decision in the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimein the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimed.

As the DWP's most recent figures show, more than half of the cases where someone appealed against a decision judging them «fit for work» have resulted in the original decision being overturned.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a federal appeals court in Manhattan on Monday that the recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.

An appeals court used a recent Supreme Court precedent to say the jury had been given incorrect instructions in the case.

In the most recent case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on June 4 denied a motion by Central Hudson and the PSC to suspend the implementation.

Recent examples include the appeal for dozens of forensic science students to assist in the case involving the missing women in British Columbia, as well as the Chandra Levy case in the United States.

The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) has provided some recent case law on reasonable foreseeability in Hadlow v Peterborough City Council (2011), where it was found against the council.

A fine example is the recent, unprecedented filing by Houston high school students of an amicus brief in the Texas school funding case now on appeal to that state's Supreme Court.

The decision is one of several in recent months by federal appeals courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.

For example, in the recent Liden v Burton [2016] EWCA Civ 275, [2016] Fam Law 687 (proprietary estoppel: see next article) Hamblen LJ characterised the issues on appeal as: «(i) whether the judge wrongly applied the law to the facts as found; (ii) whether the judge erred in the exercise of his discretion in giving effect to the equity» in the particular case.

Case 2: Record company EMI has appealed a recent court ruling that the Australian band Men at Work copied a flute riff from the children's song «Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree» in their 1980s song, «Down Under.»

A recent unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals case explains when and how a pre-existing condition can still result in Third Party damages.

In a recent appeal decision the High Court has thrown out a case on appeal brought under the sometimes controversial Animals Act legislation.

In a recent case of Interactive E-Solutions v O3B the Court of Appeal held that exclusion clauses form an essential part of a contract when allocating risks between parties and should not be construed narrowly.

The importance of understanding the identities of the parties to an agreement was highlighted in the recent case of Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping and Trading PTE Singapore Court of Appeal (Civil Division).

He maintains an active practice representing clients in high - stakes and high - exposure cases, demonstrated by his recent role defending Dakota Access in multiple appeals challenging the construction and operation of the Dakota Access pipeline in North Dakota.

In the recent case of SLG v RTG, 2016 ABCA 186 the Court of Appeal reiterated that the best interests of the child not the interests of either parent governs:

As our personal injury lawyers at Aronberg, Aronberg & Green will explore in this blog post, in a recent Florida Court of Appeal case, the Third District Court of...

Among his more substantial claims, Ed has acted in a recent appeal about the proper measure of damages in a concurrent liability case and led in a professional negligence claim against a criminal silk for his negligent conduct of an 8 - month fraud trial.

In the recent case of Meridian Credit Union Limited v Baig, 1 the Court of Appeal considered the duties owed by various parties to be honest and to not mislead each other during the course of real estate transactions.

In this recent Alberta case, upheld on appeal, the plaintiff was videoed in both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthfuIn this recent Alberta case, upheld on appeal, the plaintiff was videoed in both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthfuin both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthful.

He has particular experience of cases concerning the ECHR, and has appeared in many of the most important such cases in recent years including the recent appeals to the Supreme Court in Hesham Ali, MM (Lebanon), Agyarko and Kiarie & Byndloss.

In two recent cases the Court of Appeal have taken a pragmatic approach when considering the issue...

In a recent British Columbia case, an appeal court struck down a law firm's bill because the client hadn't been advised that the firm planned to bill what it considered was a «fair» fee for the work it performed, not simply its hourly rate.

Share This: In a recent case, R. v. Tossounian, 2017 ONCA 618 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge did not do enough in helping a self - represented accused person at triaIn a recent case, R. v. Tossounian, 2017 ONCA 618 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge did not do enough in helping a self - represented accused person at triain helping a self - represented accused person at trial.

He appeared for the successful claimant in the recent Court of Appeal of Webb which set out the principles to be applied when a claimant beats a Part 36 offer but does not succeed on all issues in the case.

Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, made that case in a recent speech at Golden Gate University School of Law.

However, as the plaintiff in a recent case before the Georgia Court of Appeals, Guice v. Brown, now realizes, the task can be even more complicated, simply depending on the identity of the other driver.

In a recent case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was faced with this exact scenario.

is designed to provide reporters, lawyers, educators, and the public with prompt, accurate, unbiased information about newsworthy and legally significant cases pending in and decided by the Federal Courts of Appeals... Use this Web site to find short summaries of recent opinions of public interest and noteworthy cases pending oral argument.

As noted in a recent case at the British Columbia Court of Appeal, the offender, a long - time drug addict, began his addiction to illicit drugs during his first term of imprisonment at a federal penitentiary.

But the Court of Appeal in Clunis did not deal with this proposition directly and particularly since the recent decision in Gray, the scope of the illegality defence in this type of case is less than clear.

The recent Court of Appeal case of Shore v Sedgwick Financial Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 863, [2008] All ER (D) 304 (Jul) clarifies the date on which a claimant's cause of action arises in negligence under the primary limitation period (Limitation Act 1980, s 2).

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision is a good one for employers when it comes to drafting employment agreement language, says a lawyer involved in the case.

Appeals Court Raises Troubling Questions in Recent G.L. c. 93A Case, By David W. White.

In this post, international commercial litigator Steven Loble discusses recent case, Singularis Holdings Ltd. v PricewaterhouseCoopers, in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist in obtaining evidence.In this post, international commercial litigator Steven Loble discusses recent case, Singularis Holdings Ltd. v PricewaterhouseCoopers, in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist in obtaining evidence.in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist in obtaining evidence.in obtaining evidence...

In a recent case the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has found that a «perfunctory and insensitive» redundancy consultation process can impact on the ultimate fairness of a redundancy dismissal.

This case follows on from the recent judgment in Sanum Investments Ltd v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic [2016] SGCA 57, in which the Singapore Court of Appeal found that an investor - State arbitral tribunal did have jurisdiction to hear claims against the Government of Laos.

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal case in Hersey v Hersey 2016 ONCA 494 restated a very nice multi-factor analysis that we can use to guide us in a Post Separation Income Increase Spousal Support dispute.

That principle was affirmed in the recent Ontario Court of Appeal case, Basandra v. Sforza.

Chapter 93A Damages in Arbitration Cases Clarified by Recent Appeals Court Case:: Boston Injury Attorney Breakstone, White & Gluck

Chapter 93A Damages in Arbitration Cases Clarified by Recent Appeals Court Case.

Recent cases include: Axiom Litigation Financing Fund (acting for the «receiver / liquidator» of a Caymans Islands fund: # 110m dispute); Frauntled Management Limited v Featherwood ($ 13m investment dispute before the BVI Court of Appeal); BBX Capital Asset Management v Royal Bank of Canada & Ors ($ 30m Cayman dispute relating to transaction to defraud creditors / sham trusts); Trinity Management Group Ltd v Burke Consolidated Ltd (s. 184I / s.175 BVI dispute); Maruti Holdings PTE Limited v Sinclair Strategies Limited (BVI jurisdictional challenge); QVT Fund & Ors v China Zenix Auto International Limited (s. 184I and s184C BVI dispute: interim injunction) In addition, the international nature of commercial fraud often results in Paul advising in relation to proceedings before off - shore courts such as in VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and NeviIn addition, the international nature of commercial fraud often results in Paul advising in relation to proceedings before off - shore courts such as in VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin Paul advising in relation to proceedings before off - shore courts such as in VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin relation to proceedings before off - shore courts such as in VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin VTB v Nutritek (advised on interim relief in Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin Cayman Islands and maintenance of BVI injunction in light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin light of UK Supreme Court decisions) and in other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Neviin other off - shore jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey and Nevis.

The duty of professional regulators to comply with the Code, and the right of a registrant to address an alleged violation through a complaint to the Human Rights Tribunal, rather than through an appeal, is illustrated in the recent human rights case of Fossum v. Society of Notaries Public of British Columbia, 2011 BCHRT 310.