Sentences with phrase «recent decision in a case»

«This prosecution, based on information provided by someone of utterly unreliable credibility, seeks to criminalize conduct that the Supreme Court of the United States recently found to be not unlawful,» Percoco's attorney Barry Bohrer said in a statement, referring to the high court's recent decision in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Federal prosecutors argue in court papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

In its recent decision in a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.»

The article, which was titled «Court Upholds Concurrent Cause Doctrine in Win for Property Policyholders,» focused on the positive ramifications for Florida commercial and residential insurance policyholders of the state Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of Sebo v. American Home Assurance.

Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and DIFC Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located there.

Not exact matches

The recent decision by Ford, Renault, Volkswagen and Nissan to expand their production in Spain is a case in point.

Perhaps the most politically volatile coming Supreme Court case is Whole Woman's Health v. Lakey, which will decide whether dozens of abortion clinics throughout Texas can remain open — a decision that probably will affect other conservative states that have in recent years imposed harsh restrictions on abortion clinics.

«Broker - dealers have to make a lot of very difficult, and in some cases expensive, decisions» regarding DOL fiduciary rule compliance, Fred Reish, partner in Drinker Biddle & Reath's employee benefits and executive compensation practice group, told ThinkAdvisor in a recent interview.

According to the Federal Court's recent decision in Taseko Mines Ltd v Canada (Environment), «a project of such magnitude as the one considered in the present case [an open - pit gold and copper mine in British Columbia] will likely have impacts in areas of both provincial and federal responsibility.»

That seems likely to remain the case in the immediate future, even though the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision permits state legislatures to enact some modest regulation of abortion practice.

But in the wake of developments in Eastern Europe and the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the Oregon peyote case, an argument could be made that the roles in our little melodrama should be reversed.

«In light of the unforeseeable changes in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raquIn light of the unforeseeable changes in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raquin established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raquin recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raquin light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raquin the Minnesota Constitution.»

The Court's own case law shows that in order to maintain the abortion right at the level of fundamental law, many other sectors of the states» legal order, at both statutory and common law, need to be altered: family law, marriage law, laws regulating the medical profession, and, as we now see with the recent circuit court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal force.

1)[The recent decisions of federal district judges Nicholas Garaufis and Shira Scheindlin in cases involving the New York City Fire and Police Departments HIGHLIGHTS....]

The recent decisions of federal district judges Nicholas Garaufis and Shira Scheindlin in cases involving the New York City Fire and Police Departments highlights the importance of the Senate's role in recommending federal judges to the President and in confirming judges who are neutral arbiters of disputes.

The Justice Department said in a statement, «After carefully considering the Supreme Court's recent decision and the principles of federal prosecution, we have made the decision not to pursue the case further.»

Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a federal appeals court in Manhattan that the recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.

Mr Mann said: «The Standards Committee's recent decision to overrule the conclusions made by the Independent Commissioner for Standards, Kathryn Hudson, in the case of Maria Miller has highlighted the problem of MPs regulating their own expenses.

In arriving at the decision, Justice Saidu relied on the recent Court of Appeal decision in the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimeIn arriving at the decision, Justice Saidu relied on the recent Court of Appeal decision in the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimein the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimed.

By focusing the campaign on women's rights at a time when many women around the country are frustrated by the debates about contraception coverage and the recent Supreme Court decision in the case involving Hobby Lobby, the new ballot line may help Mr. Cuomo increase his edge among female voters.

It said: «Considering the recent Supreme Court decision in the GITMO 2 case when interpreting Article 75 of the Constitution of Ghana, it is clear that this arrangement, which has been shrouded in utmost secrecy ought to have received Parliamentary ratification at the very least before handing over our highly - enriched uranium to the Chinese if that is the path we consider to be in our strategic national interest.»

This new round of letters to U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni, which began in the second week in August and continued until a few days ago, was prompted by a recent decision by another federal judge in Manhattan on an unrelated case.

As the DWP's most recent figures show, more than half of the cases where someone appealed against a decision judging them «fit for work» have resulted in the original decision being overturned.

Relations between de Blasio and the police unions have never been good but have worsened in recent months after a grand jury's decision not to indict an NYPD officer in the Eric Garner case and the murders last month of two officers in Brooklyn.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

Lawyers for former state Senate leader Dean Skelos told a federal appeals court in Manhattan on Monday that the recent decision reversing the corruption conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has strengthened Skelos» case for same treatment.

The letter explains that the recent 8th circuit decision in the party's ballot access case said that once a party completes the 7,000 - signature petition, it need never complete that petition again.

If that court declines to hear the case, then the recent decision in favor of Gluck will stand.

Nurse anesthetists often receive guidance from physician anesthesiologists, yet bill their time as if they are making decisions alone, according to a recent study (1) of more than 9,000 cases published online in Anesthesia & Analgesia.

On Friday, De Havilland's attorneys filed a petition with the California Supreme Court to review an appellate court's recent decision to toss out her case against FX over her portrayal in the miniseries «Feud: Bette and Joan.»

Recent publications include «Inclusivity for all applicants: An admissions case study,» in Diversity and Inclusion on Campus: Supporting Racially and Ethnically Underrepresented Students (2013); «Stressors in college choice, application and decision - making — and how to reduce them» in the Journal of College Admission (with S. Friedfeld, 2013); and «Diverse student groups: Teaching with a goal of inclusivity,» in The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education (with M. Gasman, 2009).

The Court's decision to hear Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education (Case No. 84 - 1340) marked the first time in recent years that it has agreed to review the use of affirmative - action procedures by school officials.

New York — On a recent Friday morning, while legislators and other state officials were making financial decisions that would make the difference between retaining and immediately laying off 1,000 of New York City's public - school teachers, Frank J. Macchiarola did what, in almost any other case, would be described as switching hats a few times.

Coming in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision to uphold race - conscious admissions policies at the University of Texas at Austin — a case in which Garces authored briefs on behalf of 444 social science researchers — the Schuette case will rule on changes to the admission system at public postsecondary institutions in the state of Michigan.

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, which authorizes educators to supervise the content of official high - school newspapers, is the Court's most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving public - school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 years ago.

In recent years courts have grown much more likely to defer to the decisions of school officials in cases involving school discipline, but the volume of such cases has continued to increasIn recent years courts have grown much more likely to defer to the decisions of school officials in cases involving school discipline, but the volume of such cases has continued to increasin cases involving school discipline, but the volume of such cases has continued to increase.

Alexandria, Va. (February 1, 2016)-- The National School Boards Association (NSBA) applauds the recent Nevada District Court decision granting a preliminary injunction in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz, halting the state's Education Savings Account Program (ESAP), that would divert general funds appropriated for public schools to fund private school tuition.

The decision is one of several in recent months by federal appeals courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.

In the original Brown decision, as well as a more recent case involving race and admissions to universities, a majority of the Court argued that considering race in school assignment constitutional partly because racial integration is an important part of the learning environmenIn the original Brown decision, as well as a more recent case involving race and admissions to universities, a majority of the Court argued that considering race in school assignment constitutional partly because racial integration is an important part of the learning environmenin school assignment constitutional partly because racial integration is an important part of the learning environment.

A judge's recent decision brought an end — for now — to the Authors Guild v. Google court case concerning copyright issues as they pertained to Google's attempts to preserve and provide access to millions of global titles, most of them locked away in far - reaching international and academic libraries.

Writers still have little clout legally (as witness recent court cases and decisions that treat publishers and distributors and libraries as the only folks with skin in the game) and we never will as long as we waste time sniping at each other and publishing models.

In this thesis, the ideas and concepts of Corporate Real Estate Management (CREM) are examined in terms of the contribution they could make to the process of accommodation decision by using recent cases in Dutch hospitalIn this thesis, the ideas and concepts of Corporate Real Estate Management (CREM) are examined in terms of the contribution they could make to the process of accommodation decision by using recent cases in Dutch hospitalin terms of the contribution they could make to the process of accommodation decision by using recent cases in Dutch hospitalin Dutch hospitals.

While it still reversed the district court dismissal and remanded the case back to the court, in its most recent decision, the 9th Circuit based its discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court's finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to diversify.

The Houston SPCA is deeply disappointed by the decision to dismiss the recent Puppy - Dogs - R - Us case based on a technical error in the warrant prepared by Liberty County Sheriff's Office.

In several recent cases, anti-environmental policies and decisions have already been rejected by courts, and last week, the administration withdrew a nomination for a key environmental post, Kathleen Hartnett White, after facing political resistance.

Perhaps this is related to the recent IPCC decision that drafts of AR5 are to be kept secret (and we will certainly know there are drafts in this case).

Knowing that an event like the recent flooding was to increase from a 1 in 50 yr event, to a 1 in 20 year event (or not, as the case may be) has serious implications for a government with limited resources to make decisions about how it will channel those resources to mitigation and disaster response.

Some examples include a recent hurricane, drought, or winter storm; a controversial Supreme Court decision or a high profile court case; a local policy change or contentious issue; recent military action between nations; or an issue you've personally encountered in the last few weeks.

Also following the recent mass cases involving holiday pay claims and in particular the case of Bear Scotland v Fulton (which was back to the EAT in December ’16 and the decision is awaited) it was held that if there was a gap of 3 months or more between non-payment of holiday pay then the claim would not be allowed for being out of time (allowing for any extension of time for ACAS early conciliation of course).

I don't doubt there's a real opportunity to apply the concept of «implied consent» in this case as it was set out by the SCC in the recent Trang decision.