Not exact matches
However, in light
of our substantiation
of the
effects of «grand solar minima» upon past
global climates, it could be speculated that the current pausing of «Global Warming», which is frequently referenced by those sceptical of climate projections by the IPCC, might relate at least in part to a countervailing effect of reduced solar activity, as shown in the recent sunspot cycle.&
global climates, it could be speculated that the current pausing
of «
Global Warming», which is frequently referenced by those sceptical of climate projections by the IPCC, might relate at least in part to a countervailing effect of reduced solar activity, as shown in the recent sunspot cycle.&
Global Warming», which is frequently referenced by those sceptical
of climate projections by the IPCC, might relate at least in part to a countervailing
effect of reduced solar activity, as shown in the
recent sunspot cycle.»
B. Riegl and S. Purkis's E-Letter on our
recent Review (1) focuses on promoting assisted migration, based on a belief that local adaptation and (unassisted) migration will be insufficient to allow corals to cope with the
effects of global warming and ocean acidification.
The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these
effects could be responsible for a significant amount
of the
recent global warming.
If potentially pernicious
effects such as
global warming are human - driven, then it is reasonable and sensible to ask what is fueling the
recent skyrocketing increase
of absolute
global human population numbers that, in turn, are destabilizing Earth's
global ecosystems and dissipating Earth's limited resources in our time.
Could you comment on the
recent articles about the reduction in sunspot activity possibly negating the
effect of global warming and even putting us into another Little Ice Age.
Further evidence
of the crucial importance
of El Niño is that after correcting the
global temperature data for the
effect of ENSO and solar cycles by a simple correlation analysis, you get a steady
warming trend without any
recent slowdown (see next graph and Foster and Rahmstorf 2011).
He says: «The arctic council's
recent report on the
effect of global warming -LRB-...) ignored a tickling time bomb buried in the Arctic -LRB-...).
I do think they «aren't needed» to support the assertion that various
global warming - related factors have observably played a role in causing, contributing to, and / or greatly exacerbating the destructive
effects of recent «extreme weather events».
Anthropogenic
global warming (AGW), a
recent warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the
global mean temperature anomaly trend [11], is BELIEVED to be the result
of an «enhanced greenhouse
effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [12] and changes in the use
of land [13].
In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause
of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences
of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences
of the much larger
effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the
global energy balance.
4) Thus the 1998 super El Nino induced
global warming was a secondary
effect of short - wave ocean heating, not necessarily
recent, and had very little to do with GHG.
But the observed higher summer temperatures
of recent years show more
of the true
effects of global warming, according to the research.
Just as a hypothetical example: If climate scientist will tell me that
recent pause in
global warming is due to the
effect of an inactive sun (which is the reality as reported by following) http://www.spaceweather.com and that they will go back and improve their models to account for this, then I would be more inclined to believe their other claims... Instead the IPCC doubles down on their predictions and claim the future
effects will be worst than they originally thought?
A
recent study has also found that the Mediterranean is feeling the
effects of global warming, having become both
warmer and saltier in
recent decades.
As the
recent global warming rate is identical to the pervious one, if human emission
of CO2 had any
effect on
global temperature, the
global warming rate for the period from 1970 to 2000, after 60 years
of human emission
of CO2, would have been greater than that for the period from 1910 to 1940.
So, for example, the Sun's
effects on the
recent «
global warming» are said to be
of no significance, that it's all due to the greenhouse gas increase absorbing and radiating back / holding in blanket, the infrared heat upwelling from the surface.
[T] he corresponding CCM [Convergent Cross Mapping] results indicate increasing significance
of causal
effect from SS [solar activity] to GT [
global temperature] since 1880 to
recent years, which provide solid evidences that may contribute on explaining the escalating
global tendency
of warming up
recent decades.
Non-scientist political appointees in the Bush White House, most notably CEQ Chief
of Staff Philip Cooney, made hundreds
of edits to the Plan, each
of which was designed either «to manufacture or elevate existing scientific uncertainties» or «to delete or downplay evidence
of the human
effect on
global warming,» as reported in our
recent CSPW White Paper.
The prominent upward trend in the GM precipitation occurring in the last century and the notable strengthening
of the
global monsoon in the last 30 yr (1961 — 90) appear unprecedented and are due possibly in part to the increase
of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, though the authors» simulations
of the
effects from
recent warming may be overestimated without considering the negative feedbacks from aerosols.
In
recent years, a number
of glaciologists have claimed that man - made
global warming has had the opposite
effect and glaciers across the world are melting dramatically.
Anthropogenic
global warming (AGW), a
recent warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the
global mean temperature anomaly trend [9], is believed to be the result
of an «enhanced greenhouse
effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [10] and changes in the use
of land [11]..
They foolishly connected the
recent Bangladesh cyclone with
global warming as well as saying Ban Ki - Moon had been to Antarctica to «see the
effects of climate change» without actually pointing out what they were.
The paper's investigation also couldn't find corroboration
of what Chinese scientists turned over to American scientists, leaving unanswered, «how much
of the
warming seen in
recent decades is due to the local
effects of spreading cities, rather than
global warming?»
Please note in order to avoid perpetuating the mythology that colder than normal temps in some areas mean
global warming is not happening —
global warming affects the flow
of the gulf stream among other things, meaning that while some areas
of the globe become unusually hot, others can become unusually cold — witness
recent killer freezes in Europe —
global warming is to blame for these
effects.
As such, we find that
recent global temperature records are consistent with the existing understanding
of the relationship among
global surface temperature, internal variability, and radiative forcing, which includes anthropogenic factors with well known
warming and cooling
effects.
As a result
of our
recent Global Science Report on global warming ruining our bananas, one of our fans directed our attention to an important effect of climate change that we somehow missed, back in 2008, when the alarmists at the BBC wrote that it was threatening h
Global Science Report on
global warming ruining our bananas, one of our fans directed our attention to an important effect of climate change that we somehow missed, back in 2008, when the alarmists at the BBC wrote that it was threatening h
global warming ruining our bananas, one
of our fans directed our attention to an important
effect of climate change that we somehow missed, back in 2008, when the alarmists at the BBC wrote that it was threatening haggis.
Foster and Rahmstorf (2011) used multiple linear regression to filter out the
effects of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and solar and volcanic activity (Figure 2), and found that the underlying
global surface and lower atmosphere
warming trends have remained very steady in
recent years (Figure 3).
The political statements from the CVF were reinforced at a scientific dialogue during the Bonn talks, where researchers highlighted
recent studies showing that Africa, in particular, is dangerously vulnerable to the adverse
effects of global warming.
At the most
recent international meeting on
global warming, held in Buenos Aires last December, a majority
of the delegates supported the establishment
of a fund to aid countries already suffering from the early
effects of global warming.
These results provide solid evidence that
recent global warming was indeed caused by the greenhouse
effect of anthropogenic halogenated gases.
''... [the] extreme anomalies... were a consequence
of global warming...» «Global warming causes spring warmth to come earlier...»»... this level of average warming is already having important effects»»... the dice loading is an expected effect of global warming»»... warming may cause snowfall to increase...»»... recent global warming, with high probability, is responsible for recent extreme anomalies&
global warming...» «
Global warming causes spring warmth to come earlier...»»... this level of average warming is already having important effects»»... the dice loading is an expected effect of global warming»»... warming may cause snowfall to increase...»»... recent global warming, with high probability, is responsible for recent extreme anomalies&
Global warming causes spring warmth to come earlier...»»... this level
of average
warming is already having important
effects»»... the dice loading is an expected
effect of global warming»»... warming may cause snowfall to increase...»»... recent global warming, with high probability, is responsible for recent extreme anomalies&
global warming»»...
warming may cause snowfall to increase...»»...
recent global warming, with high probability, is responsible for recent extreme anomalies&
global warming, with high probability, is responsible for
recent extreme anomalies»
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas emissions cause
warming without explicitly stating humans are the cause»... carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating
global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the cause
of global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that human's role on
recent global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent
of human - induced
global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies humans have had a minimal impact on
global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the main cause
of global warming»... anywhere from a major portion to all
of the
warming of the 20th century could plausibly result from natural causes according to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are causing
global warming»... the
global temperature record provides little support for the catastrophic view
of the greenhouse
effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that humans are causing less than half
of global warming «The human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in temperature is negligible in comparison with other sources
of carbon dioxide emission»»
But in 2016, even as the
effects of the
recent El Niño taper off,
global temperatures have risen well beyond those
of 18 years ago because
of the overall
warming that has taken place in that time.
Backing that up, NASA says that 1) sea surface temperature fluctuations (El Niño - La Niña) can cause
global temperature deviation
of about 0.2 °C; 2) solar maximums and minimums produce variations
of only 0.1 °C,
warmer or cooler; 3) aerosols from natural sources such as volcanic eruptions (Mount Pinatubo for example) have caused average cooling
of 0.3 °C, but
recent eruptions have had not had significant
effect.
Its about whether, if the
recent trend combines AMO and
global warming signals, interpretation
of this as if it were an attribution study
of global warming may overstate the pure
effect of global warming.
A
recent Lowy Institute Poll shows the proportion
of the public who say «until we are sure
global warming is really a problem, we should not take any steps that would have economic
effects» has risen from 7 to 19 % between 2006 and 2011.
The «hockey stick» may be a cause celebre among denialists, but it's only a secondary part
of the mainstream case for
global warming, which is based on the physics
of the greenhouse
effect and the observed
warming of recent decades.
The current approach that is generally pursued assumes essentially that past climate variability is indistinguishable from a stochastic red - noise process... Given such a null hypothesis, the official consensus
of IPCC (1995) tilts towards a
global warming effect of recent trace - gas emissions, which exceeds the cooling
effect of anthropogenic aerosol emissions.»
On the other hand, Gavin Schmidt
of NASA GISS, one
of the topmost scientists involved in the Catastrophic Anthropogenic
Global Warming cause, in a
recent paper clearly asserts that: • 75 %
of the Greenhouse
effect is attributable to water vapour and clouds • 100 %
of the increase in CO2 emissions since 1850 (110 ppmv) is Man - made Following these numbers through and accounting for the
effect of other Greenhouse gases results in a Man - made temperature rise between 1850 and 2010
of 2.21 °C.
The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these
effects could be responsible for a significant amount
of the
recent global warming.
In addition to Adrian Burd's recommendation, Al should read the comprehensive review by Wild: «
Global dimming and brightening: A review» http://www.leif.org/EOS/2008JD011470.pdf «Recent brightening can not supersede the greenhouse effect as the main cause of global warming, since land surface temperatures overall increased by 0.8 °C from 1960 to 2000, even though solar brightening did not fully outweigh prior dimming within this period...» The story is nowhere near as simplistic as Al would ha
Global dimming and brightening: A review» http://www.leif.org/EOS/2008JD011470.pdf «
Recent brightening can not supersede the greenhouse
effect as the main cause
of global warming, since land surface temperatures overall increased by 0.8 °C from 1960 to 2000, even though solar brightening did not fully outweigh prior dimming within this period...» The story is nowhere near as simplistic as Al would ha
global warming, since land surface temperatures overall increased by 0.8 °C from 1960 to 2000, even though solar brightening did not fully outweigh prior dimming within this period...» The story is nowhere near as simplistic as Al would have it.