4) A case in point on
recent hurricane science coverage is this important paper published in June in, you guessed it, Nature.
Not exact matches
Some of the most
recent comprehensive assessments of climate
science, including last year's congressionally - mandated, White House - approved, Climate Science Special Report, include scary new sections on «climate surprises» like simultaneous droughts and hurricanes, that have wide - reaching conseq
science, including last year's congressionally - mandated, White House - approved, Climate
Science Special Report, include scary new sections on «climate surprises» like simultaneous droughts and hurricanes, that have wide - reaching conseq
Science Special Report, include scary new sections on «climate surprises» like simultaneous droughts and
hurricanes, that have wide - reaching consequences.
But the point of the whole op - ed piece, as well as the
Science paper, was that our
recent history is, in fact, consistent with our current projections of long - term trends towards stronger
hurricanes worldwide.
Part I Re # 62 and # 61; Those issues relate back to the AMO's quite questionable role in Atlantic
hurricane intensity / frequency and Landsea et al's oblique attack on the more
recent hurricane intensity data in
Science which Chuck Booth links to.
A
recent report quoted in
Science (26 August, 2005 — page 1302) refers to a study of the March 2004 cyclone in the South Atlantic that turned into a
hurricane and struck the southern coast of Brasil at about latitude 27 degrees south.
The article acknowledged «concern» regarding «the connection between
hurricanes and global warming,» but noted that although» [t] hat is a subject of a heated debate in the
science community,» «Gore cited five
recent scientific studies to support his view.»