Sentences with phrase «recent judgment of the court»

A recent judgment of the Court of Quebec should give pause to real estate brokers working in the province.

Not exact matches

A recent court judgment in a remote corner of Canada threatens to interfere with the way prospectors explore for minerals in much of the country.

The Recording Industry of America on Monday urged a federal appeals court to reconsider a recent decision upholding a $ 5.3 million judgment against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for copying a Marvin Gaye song to create their 2013 smash «Blurred Lines.»

Although the specific issue of restricting smoking in prisons may appear of minor significance compared to other recent defeats in court for the justice secretary, this judgment is important because it clearly brings the prison system within the ambit of the Health Act.

The governor, who said there was nothing wrong with the legal system in Nigeria, added that «in recent times, politicians like President Buhari are the ones responsible for the rot in the judiciary because of their desperation to use the courts to foist one party state on Nigerians with conflicting judgments from election tribunals.»

«The further suggestions in Lord Carey's statement that recent court judgments which have not upheld claims of unlawful discrimination against Christians in the workplace are a threat to the social order and a step away from barring Christians from any employment is scaremongering, and a desperate cry from those unrepresentative few who are trying to retain the kind of privileges for religion that have no place in our society.»

Former Attorney General, Martin Amidu in his recent epistle said it is clear that the NDC government is «acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent judgment the Supreme Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government as a means of aborting the further investigations ordered by the Commissioner.»

During Justice Questions yesterday, the issue of votes for prisoners was raised on the back of the recent judgment from the European Court of Human Rights.

Contrary to what I have mostly heard in the media by way of interpretation of the Supreme Court judgment in the recent Abu Ramadan case:

«Of recent, there have been arguments on who has power to do what,» he said, adding that Nigeria had a lot of people who knew how to go to court to get all kinds of judgmentOf recent, there have been arguments on who has power to do what,» he said, adding that Nigeria had a lot of people who knew how to go to court to get all kinds of judgmentof people who knew how to go to court to get all kinds of judgmentof judgments.

McCain was responding to a question from the mother of a boy with autism, who asked about a recent story that the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program had issued a judgment in favor of an unnamed child whose family claimed regressive encephalopathy and symptoms of autism were caused by thimerosal.

Related articles: Long Term Capital Gain Exemptions on Sale of Property & Recent Court Judgments Checklist of Important Property Documents in India Legal Checklist for Property Purchase

The judgment could best be understood in the context of the Court's recent push for legal certainty and transparency in the field of EU citizens» welfare rights.

In a series of recent judgments, the Fourth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union («the General Court») annulled the designation of some of the largest privately held commercial Iranian banks on the EU's sanctions list.

The most recent judgment by the Supreme Court of British Columbia stayed the extradition proceedings and delivered a number of withering criticisms of the conduct of Cisco and the authorities.

In her recent entry on this blog, Prof. Capaldo criticised the judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU in Taricco II by arguing that there exists, in international law (or what the author calls «global law»), a fundamental human right to policies that criminalise tax fraud.

Alongside all this, the Court of Justice has thrown its cap into the ring in the recent judgment in Lounes.

Second, Melloni has become «hot» again thanks to the recent follow - up judgment of the Spanish Constitutional Court, which shows the real impact of the CJEU's ruling and which will be discussed in a separate post by M. García García.

This very issue was on display in the recent judgment of the General Court in Case T - 851 / 16 Access Info Europe v Commission.

Even though most of them have hardly been updated (not even to insert for instance the post-Lisbon numbering, which would have been quite helpful), for those who follow the case law of the European courts closely, constant parallels with recent cases come to mind, forcing the reader to reconsider the novelty of some striking recent judgments, or better grasp the subtlety of the evolution of the Court's case law.

R (MILLER) V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION In this briefing, Tom Leary considers the Divisional Court's recent Brexit judgment on the government's power to give notice under Article 50 of the TEU for the United Kingdom to cease membership of the EU The prerogative powers The prerogative powers are the residual.OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION In this briefing, Tom Leary considers the Divisional Court's recent Brexit judgment on the government's power to give notice under Article 50 of the TEU for the United Kingdom to cease membership of the EU The prerogative powers The prerogative powers are the residual.of the TEU for the United Kingdom to cease membership of the EU The prerogative powers The prerogative powers are the residual.of the EU The prerogative powers The prerogative powers are the residual...

Both sides and the Judges involved in a recent U.S. Supreme Court judgment missed the applicability of an explicitly on - topic Act of Congress: the military justice provisions

The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Tchenguiz v Imerman; Imerman v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908, [2010] All ER (D) 320 (Jul), however, has revealed the Hildebrand rules to be nothing more than a myth, condemning them as «unlawful».

The judgment quotes, in that regard, the recent judgments of the General Court in Banco Santander and Autogrill.

The recent judgment of the ECJ in T & L Sugars, a case dealing with import licenses for sugar, for example, shows that the ECJ quickly concludes that there are implementing measures at the national level, which should be challenged before national courts (C - 456 / 13 P, T & L Sugars, EU: C: 2015:284).

In a recent judgment the Court of Appeal has overturned a decision holding a bank liable for negligent misstatement arising out of a credit worthiness reference...

Jersey partner, Andreas Kistler, and senior associate, Alexa Saunders, spoke about recent amendments to the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 and also spoke about the first judgments from the Royal Court of Jersey regarding the Jersey foundation.

The recent Supreme Court judgment found that foresight of the second crime was not an «automatic authorisation of it» and that the doctrine had been wrongly applied for decades.

This case follows on from the recent judgment in Sanum Investments Ltd v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic [2016] SGCA 57, in which the Singapore Court of Appeal found that an investor - State arbitral tribunal did have jurisdiction to hear claims against the Government of Laos.

Considering that the same district court allowed Apple to leverage a couple of recent Supreme Court opinions concerning fee - shifting in connection with its pursuit of a recovery of attorneys» fees from Samsung, it would seem just fair for Samsung to be allowed to make an Alice argument now, just in time before Judge Lucy Koh will decide on the parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the recent $ 119 million jury verdict (which was disappointing enough for Apple to request a retrcourt allowed Apple to leverage a couple of recent Supreme Court opinions concerning fee - shifting in connection with its pursuit of a recovery of attorneys» fees from Samsung, it would seem just fair for Samsung to be allowed to make an Alice argument now, just in time before Judge Lucy Koh will decide on the parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the recent $ 119 million jury verdict (which was disappointing enough for Apple to request a retrCourt opinions concerning fee - shifting in connection with its pursuit of a recovery of attorneys» fees from Samsung, it would seem just fair for Samsung to be allowed to make an Alice argument now, just in time before Judge Lucy Koh will decide on the parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the recent $ 119 million jury verdict (which was disappointing enough for Apple to request a retrial).

I was surprised to read in Eric Appleby's recent post that fully 70 % of judgments received from the courts are selected for reporting in Maritime Law Books» print reporters; I would be interested to know what the proportion is for Ontario judgments and the Ontario Reports.

There is no shortage of rhetoric in the Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision on the scope and interpretation of amendments to Ontario's Rule 20 governing motions for summary judgment.

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Kenya in relation to the election was a brave step for judges in asserting the rule of law.

The judgment is a further addition to the recent line of authorities in which the Courts have been prepared to maintain the automatic suspension in an EU procurement dispute until full trial.

Rosanna Foskett examines the recent judgment in Hart and Samways v Burbidge, which illustrates how the courts will apply the principle of presumed undue influence, even where such influence was not intentional

In the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in 2147191 Ontario Inc. v. Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd., the plaintiffs brought a partial summary judgment motion seeking to rescind a franchise agreement under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the «Act»).

The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in 2337310 Ontario Inc. v. 2264145 Ontario Inc., 2014 ONSC 4370, addressed a partial summary judgment motion brought by the franchisee of a cafe seeking a declaration that it was entitled to exercise its right of rescission under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 («the Act»).

The application of the «real and substantial connection» test for enforcement of foreign judgments was further clarified by the Ontario Court of Appeal in a recent decision, part of a bitter and protracted legal battle over nearly $ 10 billion in environmental damages caused by the operations of Texaco (later acquired by the defendant Chevron) in Ecuador.

This is of course a general problem with the Court's website (although half of the list of judgments does indicate the subject - matter) and it makes it a bit more tedious to skim through recent judgments that might potentially be of interest to you.

Edit (4 June 2015): I would like to refer to Pieter Jan Kuijper's recent informative blogpost on the blog of ACELG for further reading and a different view on the Court's judgment.

The importance of the third point above is demonstrated by the recent decision of the European Union Court of Justice (EUCJ) which in September 2014 gave judgment in the appeal from the General Court in the dispute between the Groupement des cartes bancaires and the European Commission (Groupement des cartes bancaires v European Commission C - 67 / 13 P (CB)-RRB-.

The recent European Court of Human Rights judgment in Barbulescu confirms what many UK employers already practise, but with a twist.

However, this principal may now be undermined given Ontario Court of Appeal's recent decision in an appeal on a summary judgment motion in Michela v. St. Thomas of Villanova Catholic School, where Justice Huscroft explicitly rejected Bohemier as it was applied in Gristey,

While pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is trying to get the Supreme Court of Canada to take a second look at its recent judgment voiding its patent on Viagra, it's trying to use the same decision to quash a case in the Federal Court involving another generic drug maker.

In Canada, the recent majority judgment in Quebec (Attorney General) v. A., 2013 SCC 5, more commonly known as Eric v. Lola, is also an instance of Supreme Court justices deferring to the Quebec legislature's choice to draw a distinction between treatment of common law and married spouses.

My own experience of tribunals and the courts began in the year 2000 and the most recent judgment that CANLII finds by searching on my name — http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/#search/jId=bc&sort=decisionDate&id=%22Budgell%22 — dates from 2012, but if I'm able to proceed with the action I now have in mind then there will be at least one more judgment added to that list.

In the recent decision of Covenoho v. Pendylum Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal awarded a former employee of Pendylum 40 weeks» pay ($ 56,000.00), overturning the ruling of the Motion Judge at summary judgment.

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Armada Lines Ltd. v. Chaleur Fertilizers Ltd. overturned the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal.

This trend stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case, Hryniak v Mauldin, which held that «summary judgment rules must be interpreted broadly, favouring proportionality and fair access to affordable, timely and just adjudication of claims.»

Among Mr. Born's recent significant litigation matters are representation of various European entities in the Holocaust Assets and Forced Labor litigations, representation of a major US petroleum company in defending against efforts to enforce purported foreign judgments in the United States and testimony as an expert witness in a number of proceedings in Swedish, English, US, Japanese and other courts.