In fact, Michigan led the nation in anonymous spending in the most
recent judicial election cycle.
A little - noticed document filed by the Presidency on March 16 provides at least part of the explanation: because of
the recent judicial elections, the Presidency has dissolved the PTC that was handling the Afghanistan situation (PTC III) and reassigned the situation to a newly - constituted PTC (PTC II).
Not exact matches
But, according to a
recent opinion from the Florida Supreme Court
Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (via the Legal Profession Blog), only because the appeals for donations are on a page sponsored by Comiter's
election committee, rather than his personal page.
Other
recent changes have already introduced more partisanship and money into
judicial elections.
JY - In
recent decades it has become quite clear that
judicial elections can be ugly affairs with lots of negative campaigning - doesn't this hurt the judiciary's image - making people see them less as esteemed decision makers and more as politicians in robes?