Sentences with phrase «recent ruling in that case»

Not exact matches

In fact, Lash says this rule might be warranted given a recent court case.

In a recent court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.

At least that is what a recent ruling in a New Brunswick court case would seem to indicate.

Each member of the Audit Committee shall meet the independence standards and expertise requirements of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rules promulgated thereunder, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), and other applicable laws and regulations, in each case, as of the Firm's most recent annual meeting.

«Broker - dealers have to make a lot of very difficult, and in some cases expensive, decisions» regarding DOL fiduciary rule compliance, Fred Reish, partner in Drinker Biddle & Reath's employee benefits and executive compensation practice group, told ThinkAdvisor in a recent interview.

In particular, we must fight to preserve another recent Supreme Court ruling from a case called Alice v. CLS Bank.

I am sure your church would also like to have some rules in place that prevent discussion and criticism of the pope and the recent horrendous abuse cases.

In recent years the International Court of Justice — the World Court — has ruled against the U.S. in human rights cases brought by Nicaragua and ParaguaIn recent years the International Court of Justice — the World Court — has ruled against the U.S. in human rights cases brought by Nicaragua and Paraguain human rights cases brought by Nicaragua and Paraguay.

With the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Allegheny County v. ACLU, I believe a new and exciting chapter in the church - state debate may be evolving around Jewish attempts in Pittsburgh and other places to legitimate the display of Jewish religious symbols in the public square.

Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's appeal has gained some ground in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo in public corruption cases.

Such legal distinctions are illustrated in the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell.

Bharara also said he might have done some things differently in his prosecution of two former legislative leaders had the cases come before a recent Supreme Court ruling that reversed the corruption charges against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

With regards to the Tier 1 Entrepreneur and Investor Visa categories the recent changes of 6th April 2011 are to be applauded, in attracting high net worth individuals to invest in the UK with a reduced initial investment (in some cases) and relaxed rules in relation to residential requirements.

Bharara also said he might have done some things differently in his prosecution of two former legislative leaders, had the cases come before a recent Supreme Court ruling that reversed the corruption charges against former Virginia Governor McDonnell.

Despite the allegation involving funding for the DA's race — and another accusing Sampson of filing false Senate disclosure forms to conceal a $ 188,500 loan from a real estate developer — Carter insisted his case wasn't in the same category as a recent rash of other criminal cases accusing New York lawmakers of abusing their authority for personal gain or to cheat on campaign finance rules.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

His statement follows series of attacks on journalists reporting from the headquarters of the ruling party, with the most recent being the slaps received by Multimedia Adom FM journalist who was assaulted by famous NPP one - woman vigilante Hajia Fati in a case of «mistaken identity», as according to Hajia Fati, she mistook the journalist for an onion seller and gave her a sound slap for taking pictures of her without permission.

Coming in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision to uphold race - conscious admissions policies at the University of Texas at Austin — a case in which Garces authored briefs on behalf of 444 social science researchers — the Schuette case will rule on changes to the admission system at public postsecondary institutions in the state of Michigan.

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, which authorizes educators to supervise the content of official high - school newspapers, is the Court's most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving public - school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 years ago.

This latest Supreme Court ruling, along with the recent anti-tenure case in California, and Governor Malloy's worst in - the - nation anti-teacher, anti-union initiative in 2012 should remind voters that when it comes to protecting the rights of workers few politicians truly say what they mean and mean what they say.

(Calif.) In an effort to make charter school facilities ruled illegal in a recent court case compliant, state officials are recommending the unauthorized uses be allowed to temporarily remain open under a state waiver procesIn an effort to make charter school facilities ruled illegal in a recent court case compliant, state officials are recommending the unauthorized uses be allowed to temporarily remain open under a state waiver procesin a recent court case compliant, state officials are recommending the unauthorized uses be allowed to temporarily remain open under a state waiver process.

In a recent case (see blog post), a federal court ruled that the debt buyer collection agency could not charge interest from the date of charge off with the original creditor.

No home rule exceptions A recent court case ruled that a «home rule» city in Oklahoma may NOT pass a breed - specific law that conflicts with the state law against BSL.

The Schilthorn and the Schynige Platte, to name but two, proved very popular with travellers on my recent Bernese Oberland trip, and, of course, the highlight of the whole week was the mammoth and spectacular three - stage Jungfrau Express trip though, in our case, the appalling weather virtually ruled out the prospect of any views from about Lauterbrunnen onwards.

Please visit our Legal Cases page for more information on the DEA hemp food rules challenge, FOIA challenge, NAFTA challenge, the White Plume case, and the most recent case in North Dakota - Monson vs DEA.

In this more recent case of largesse, the mayor will give Environmental Defense Fund $ 6 million to carry out the «strategy of securing strong rules and developing industry best practices in the 14 states with 85 percent of the country's unconventional gas reserves.&raquIn this more recent case of largesse, the mayor will give Environmental Defense Fund $ 6 million to carry out the «strategy of securing strong rules and developing industry best practices in the 14 states with 85 percent of the country's unconventional gas reserves.&raquin the 14 states with 85 percent of the country's unconventional gas reserves.»

Case 2: Record company EMI has appealed a recent court ruling that the Australian band Men at Work copied a flute riff from the children's song «Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree» in their 1980s song, «Down Under.»

The recent Supreme Court ruling in eBay v. MercExchange, setting the standard for injunctive relief in patent cases, is the topic of this week's legal affairs podcast Coast to Coast.

In the most recent example, the CJEU ruled yesterday (Case C - 277 / 11 M.M.) that fundamental rights, specifically the right to be heard, must be respected where a State considers applications for subsidiary protection in a separate procedure from the refugee status determination (which has the effect of excluding the application of the Procedures DirectiveIn the most recent example, the CJEU ruled yesterday (Case C - 277 / 11 M.M.) that fundamental rights, specifically the right to be heard, must be respected where a State considers applications for subsidiary protection in a separate procedure from the refugee status determination (which has the effect of excluding the application of the Procedures Directivein a separate procedure from the refugee status determination (which has the effect of excluding the application of the Procedures Directive).

However, in many (though not all cases) blogs tend to consist primarily of chronologically ordered commentary on recent legal developments in a niche practice area, while traditional microsites tend to also feature extensive libraries of resources such as (in the case of Law and Ethics Online) links to lobbying laws, rules and regulations in all 50 States.

In describing recent rulings interpreting the material change doctrine, Lawyers Weekly cited two cases in which Todd & Weld attorneys obtained positive results for their clientIn describing recent rulings interpreting the material change doctrine, Lawyers Weekly cited two cases in which Todd & Weld attorneys obtained positive results for their clientin which Todd & Weld attorneys obtained positive results for their clients.

Serna v. Pettey Leach Trucking, Inc. (2003) 110 Cal.App.4 th 1475, 1486 is among recent cases to state that XYZ is vicariously liable for the negligent acts of ABC in that instance: «Hence, the rule is that a carrier who undertakes an activity (1) which can be lawfully carried on only under a public franchise or authority and (2) which involves possible danger to the public is liable to a third person for harm caused by the negligence of the carrier's independent contractor.

These are three recent examples of cases where Ontario courts have ruled in favour of individuals who claim they had been defamed by unproven allegations of sexual assault.

In its recent decision in a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.&raquIn its recent decision in a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.&raquin a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.»

Share This: In a recent case, R. v. Tossounian, 2017 ONCA 618 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge did not do enough in helping a self - represented accused person at triaIn a recent case, R. v. Tossounian, 2017 ONCA 618 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge did not do enough in helping a self - represented accused person at triain helping a self - represented accused person at trial.

In a recent case, Daniels v. Grizzell, 2016 ONSC 7351, Associate Chief Justice Marrocco provided some comments that clarify the interpretation of Rule 48.14 and give clear answers to a number of the more common questions LawPRO has received from Ontario lawyers.

Fully revised and updated, key developments covered in the new edition include the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (as amended up to 2017) and the incorporation of recent case law, including the Supreme Court ruling that led to the government abolishing fees in 2017.

I would suggest that the emphasis on the democracy principle is reminiscent of the Court's emphasis on the principle of the rule of law in the recent case of H v Council, where the Court interpreted the Treaty provisions on the Court's jurisdiction with regard to CFSP - matters through the prism of the principle of the rule of law.

The recent Philip Morris ruling is a bold move against minimum harmonisation that has potential to considerably narrow the EU legislator's room for manoeuvre, if followed in subsequent cases.

As a recent federal ruling, U.S. v. Dicus (reducing a sentence as a sanction for prosecutorial misconduct) proves, legal scholarship can have an impact on the outcome of a case, even if a paper hasn't been published in a top journal.

Maggie Lowe, director of personal financial planning at the firm, says using the new rules enabled the trustees in a recent case she was involved in to increase the cash equivalent transfer values by 27 %, increasing estimated retirement income for both parties.

Several recent cases brought by celebrities have effectively created a new privacy law in the U.K. And recently, the House of Lords upheld a landmark ruling barring the friend of a well - known folk singer from publishing certain passages of a tell - all book about the celebrity.»

Jackson v. Louisiana is the latest of several cases in recent years calling upon the Supreme Court to revisit its 1972 rulings in Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana, -LSB-...]

Following on from the Sanum [3] and Philip Morris [4] cases and together with the launch of the SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules and the recent establishment of regional offices for both the PCA and ICC in Singapore, it suggests that investment arbitration is on the rise.

In the concurring opinion, Justice Patience Roggensack, joined by Justices David T. Prosser, Jr., Annette Kingsland Ziegler and Michael J. Gableman, responded that the rule changes comport with the Wisconsin Constitution, U.S. Constitution and recent case law.

This article discusses two recent G.L. c. 93A and c. 176D cases, which reverse the rule in Thaler, which had required insurance companies to settle personal injury claims for policy limits without a release when liability was not disputed and the damages exceeded the policy limits.

In addition, a recent Supreme Court ruling relating to medical device law may affect your case.

Such was the case in a recent lawsuit involving the severe burning of a minor in a public park has become a precedent setting decision after it was ruled that the defendants in the case, East Bay Regional Park District and Girl Scouts of Northern California, were liable for the injuries caused to 10 year old Fabio Hornischer's hand and arm in a fire pit.

101 Incidents of ethical violations resulting in professional discipline and even criminal prosecution are on the rise.102 Faced with declining profit margins, firms have been accused of «overworking files» and overstaffing projects in an effort to increase billable hours.103 And they have bent the rules governing conflicts of interest.104 One survey indicated that one - third of the 30,000 clients interviewed felt dissatisfied with the representation they received from their attorneys, citing primarily a failure to communicate and inadequate attention given to their cases, suggesting that law firms are under pressure to increase their case loads without hiring new associates to staff them.105 The recent decline in professionalism is even further evidenced by a decline in pro bono commitment.106 Thus, new graduates face even heavier workloads, increased pressure to meet high billable requirements, and fewer pro bono opportunities.

It is particularly interesting to see Zuchtvieh in light of the Court's other recent case law on the extraterritorial application of EU rules.