Aided by a highly misleading New York Times article, the anti-Common Core crowd is pushing the narrative that Massachusetts's
recent testing decision spells the end for the common standards effort.
Aided by a highly misleading New York Times article, the anti-Common Core crowd is pushing the narrative that Massachusetts's
recent testing decision (to use a blend of PARCC and its own assessment rather than go with PARCC alone) spells the end for the common standards effort.
Not exact matches
Confidently, because 1) we know exactly how our present methods, as well as our pre-2009 methods, have navigated complete market cycles across history, and in real - time prior to this half - cycle, and 2) taking both our present and pre-2009 methods to data from
recent years, we also know the «counterfactual» - how our discipline could have navigated the markets since 2009, had my stress -
testing decision not bared the Achilles Heel that we addressed in 2014.
The Deutsche Bank analysis was prompted by the Far Work Commission's
recent decision to reject a pay deal for workers at Coles, as it did not meet the «better off overall»
test» because an employee who typically works weekends was worse off under the agreement than under the relevant retail modern award».
The most
recent concussion consensus statements [1,7,15] recommend neuropsychological (NP)
testing in making return to play
decisions after concussion, and formal baseline NP screening of athletes in all organized sports in which there is a high risk of concussion (e.g. football, hockey, lacrosse, soccer, basketball), regardless of the age or level of performance.
In one
test for working memory — the ability to use
recent experience to make
decisions — the mice were trained to find food in one arm of a maze based on a visual cue.
Judge Susan Illston wrote in her opinion that she invalidated the patent, held by the San Diego, California - based company Sequenom, based on several
recent rulings, including the Supreme Court's
decision denying patent claims on BRCA genes used in cancer risk
testing.
In a
recent interview, Michael Busch discusses the FDA and CDC's
decision to require Zika
testing for all blood donors.
The plain white outfit has dependably been the ideal
decision yet these conventions have been
tested in the most
recent style wave which has realised a progressive change in the Latest Western marriage dresses by virtue of the veneration and shading change presented in the inconclusive mixed bags that are up in the business now.
While its true it «negates» the
test requirement of the Stull act, and thus the
recent ruling, the bill was originally written a couple years ago so I don't know that reversing that ruling could have been conscious
decision.
A
recent New York court
decision invalidated the use of student
test scores in teacher evaluations due to the arbitrary and capricious nature of the process.
On this note, and «[i] n sum,
recent research on value added tells us that, by using data from student perceptions, classroom observations, and
test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although] if a district administrator uses data like that collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel
decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added].
Safety rarely made headlines before 1997 but today it's paramount for most consumers - and low ratings, such as the two stars given to the Ford Mustang in the most
recent round of
tests - can make or break a customer's
decision to buy a new car.
Asked about General Motors Corp.'s
recent decision to cancel its GM - 80 program to build a plastic - body replacement for the Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac Firebird by 1989, Du Pont denied that the project was scrapped because of the plastic's failure to pass crash
tests.
In a
recent 2010 Oklahoma Court
decision, the same issue was again
tested with Taylor v. Glenn.
Following the
recent decision by the U.S. District Court of Minnesota invalidating the EIC patent, customers can request certificates from OFA for
testing performed at Paw Print Genetics.
A
recent Alberta Court of Appeal
decision confirms that evidence of substance - related safety risks across an employer's workforce (including both union and non-union workers) may be taken into account when assessing the permissibility of random
testing of unionized workers.
The Court of Appeal applied the
test as established in its
recent decision of Hoang v. Vicentini2 to determine whether there was a reasonable apprehension of conflict of interest on the part of counsel appointed by the insurer:
There has been significant discussion in
recent weeks concerning the
recent Alberta Court of Appeal
decision on random workplace drug
testing.
The
recent history of judicial review in Canada has been marked by ebbs and flows of deference, confounding
tests and new words for old problems, but no solutions that provide real guidance for litigants, counsel, administrative
decision makers or judicial review judges.
California has
tested the limits of punitive damages in two
recent state supreme court
decisions, Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding, and Johnson v. Ford Motor.
The application of the «real and substantial connection»
test for enforcement of foreign judgments was further clarified by the Ontario Court of Appeal in a
recent decision, part of a bitter and protracted legal battle over nearly $ 10 billion in environmental damages caused by the operations of Texaco (later acquired by the defendant Chevron) in Ecuador.
In a
recent decision of the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, Maryland's intermediate appellate court addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic
testing, and his request for discovery.
Barclays was the first UK bank to make such an application, making the
recent High Court
decision an important
test case.
The
recent decision from the NLRB has adopted a new
test that will be used by the Board in determining whether or not a company policy or workplace rule violates the National Labor Relations Act.
In a
recent decision, Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corp, the Supreme Court of Canada («SCC») held that the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal («Tribunal») reasonably concluded that a worker who
tested positive for drugs following a workplace accident was terminated because he breached the employer's drug policy and not for discriminatory reasons.
[35] The
test for cancelling or reducing child support arrears was cited by Madam Justice Fenlon in her
recent decision in Beavis v. Beavis, 2014 BCSC 422 (released March 13, 2014).
A
recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the «HRTO») has further defined the scope of the
test for «family status» discrimination.
Our retroactive spousal support lawyers were interested to see a
recent BC Court of Appeal
decision on retroactive spousal support that was just handed down where a husband took issue with the
test to be applied for a retroactive spousal support start date.
Although in the two
recent Alberta
decisions neither Mr. Caron nor Mr. Chieriro ultimately
tested language protection in the human rights context, there will undoubtedly be cases around the corner that will continue to determine when and how claimants can be successful in language - related claims under the AHRA.
A
recent Court of Appeals
decision applies the economic reality
test to make that
decision.
Justice Hainey referred to the piercing of the corporate veil
test in Transamerica Life Insurance Co. of Canada v. Canada Life Assurance Co., but also to the Ontario Court of Appeal's
recent decision in Indcondo Building Corporation v. Sloan, which affirmed that this veil will only be pierced with wrongdoing akin to fraud in the establishment or use of the corporation.
Recent decision in Canadian Energy Workers» Association v ATCO Electric Ltd. does not change the law but it does help clarify when an employer may be justified in ordering an employee involved in an incident to undergo drug and alcohol
testing.
Recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada have clarified the
test that the courts must use to determine if there exists the necessary «real and substantial connection» between the jurisdiction and the subject litigation.
«In a
recent decision, Eastern District of Texas Judge Rodney Gilstrap developed a broadly - sweeping four - factor «totality»
test seemingly aimed at keeping patent - infringement suits in his jurisdiction.»
Recent decisions risk making the threshold stage only a minimal hurdle because the «reasonable expectation'
test is transforming into the question whether Art 8 is engaged at all.
Although rejecting any legal requirement that disclosure be in the patent, both of the
recent Federal Court anti-disclosure
decisions nonetheless found there was no sound prediction based on literature and / or inhouse
tests / documents from the patentee.
March 7, 2018 Suncor's Random Drug and Alcohol
Testing Program Remains on Hold — Court of Appeal Upholds Injunction
Decision In a recent decision, 2018 ABCA 75, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld a decision of the Alberta
Decision In a
recent decision, 2018 ABCA 75, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld a decision of the Alberta
decision, 2018 ABCA 75, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld a
decision of the Alberta
decision of the Alberta Court...
First, the
decision is the latest in a series of
recent examples where the «appropriate means» branch of the discoverability
test in section 5 (1)(a)(iv) of the Limitations Act, 2002, was employed to delay the discoverability of a claim.