The only
recent valid data is radiosonde RSS and Satellite AMSU.
Not exact matches
Many of the largest
recent data breaches employed
valid, stolen employee account credentials, and existing security technologies are often unable to detect the use of these stolen credentials.
They neglect the pre-1980s temperatures, the post-2000 temperatures, and the
recent millennium of historical temperatures — they take a few unidentified
data points out of a long series that support their desired point — fail to mention those
data points and past trends that refute their point — and assert that they have presented a
valid overall picture — in short, cherry - picking.
Both authors even admitted that their reconstructions aren't statistically
valid (and that was kind of their point...) and McIntyre, at least, has stated that he regards many studies since then the same way he does the original 1998 paper because they basically use the same datasets and analysis (And I should add that he seems less opposed to the more
recent studies, especially those that don't use
data he finds suspicious...) They've stated their a priori reasons why they don't like the
data they don't like.
Doug Proctor says: February 3, 2011 at 2:32 pm «The circular logic of Phil Jones — to drop the mis - matching tree ring
data for the
recent past on the basis that the previous trends (before temperature
data) of proxy
data were
valid, while the
recent proxy
data was invalid because it didn't follow the temperature measurement trends is still not understood.»
Within the space afforded by using two times the standard error you will be able to draw trend lines that are indistinguishable from previous
recent decades, and they will be as «
valid» as the «statistically flat» trend Dr. Whitehouse assures us is in this
data.
Obviously, there is a logical contradiction here, if both conclusions, «global warming» and «pause» over the
recent 20 years were equally
valid, based on the same logic of reasoning and using the same
data, only switching the Null - hypothesis with the alternative hypothesis, since the two conclusions are mutually exclusive.
He, no doubt, chose that option of maintaining the trend in the
recent «good»
data, because it was consistent with his theory, this may be thought to lack conservatism in that it was least consistent with the discarded
data, but is a
valid exercise of judgement.
If the system is capable of exhibiting sufficient capacitance to produce the
recent hiatus, there is no
valid argument against why it could not also have produced the entire modern warming, unless that can be disproven with empirical
data or I / O test results.
The problem is with the historic
data and using it as a
valid comparison to
recent data.
A
recent report finds that
data sets used by climate alarmists are not a
valid representation of reality, including their repeated claims of highest recorded average temperatures.
In the most
recent period, 2001 — 2005, 74/935 (8 %) of notifications in NSW did not include
valid data on Aboriginal status (Table 2).