Sentences with phrase «recently federal court decision»

In the recently Federal Court decision, an incorrect fee was paid on patent at issue while it was pending as an application.

Not exact matches

The filings recently prompted a California federal judge to threaten to brand the network a «vexatious litigant» because its lawsuits seemed designed to «overwhelm the courts... so as to avoid a rational decision on the merits.»

The public benefit test was recently considered, albeit not in a media merger context, by the Full Federal Court in ACCC v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 (Tabcorp) where the Court applied a broad concept of public benefit consistent with the Fairfax decision in New Zealand:

Judge Crotty indicated that although he was obliged to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.&rCourt's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.&rcourt's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.»

She released a new TV ad today that continues her ongoing effort to link Martins with disgraced former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, who lost his job in a federal corruption scandal — though his conviction was recently overturned, thanks to a U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the definition of an «official act» in connection with public corruption.

2016), the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court's decision declining to grant attorney's fees because «there was nothing obviously unreasonable» about the losing litigant's position, which the district court found to be «non-frivolous.»

But until fairly recently, legal publishing giant West claimed that it owned the copyright to federal court decisions.

I recently had to produce a bilingual text, and while I started in English, it was fairly easy with Supreme Court decisions and Ontario and federal acts, to cut and paste in parallel translations.

In an unusual en banc decision rendered without requesting briefing from the parties, the United States, or interested amici curiae, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed several rulings in favor of Apple Inc. in its ongoing smartphone patent war with Samsung.

Recently, in Abdi v. Karnes, he obtained a 2008 federal court decision in favor of the mother of a mentally ill teenager who was shot and killed by sheriff's deputies.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidating two patents after an inter partes review proceeding, even though the decision partially rested on references and evidence not disclosed in the challenger's petition for review or the PTAB's decision to institute.

The decision was recently affirmed by a federal court of appeals.

The Federal Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations human rights case against the federal goveFederal Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations human rights case against the federal govefederal government.

No surprise that the Federal government will be appealing the assisted suicide decision recently rendered by the British Columbia Supreme Court in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General).

The Federal Court has recently released its decision in the application made by certain employees of Telus Communications, complaining about the use of voice recognition technology for some of its internal management systems.

Recently, in Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a fantastic decision striking - down illegally promulgated regulations from the Federal Communications Commission.

On issues such as the content of the record on judicial review applications, the extent to which administrative decision - makers can participate in judicial reviews of their decisions, superior court review of federal prison decisions and tribunals» capacity to reconsider their decisions, Canadian courts have recently come under pressure to update the procedural law to bring it into line with the substantive law.

In the article titled «Hatch - Waxman And Biosimilars Litigation: 2017 Year - in - Review,» we provide a brief overview of the Hatch - Waxman Act, a summary of the recently released FDA Draft Guidance, a general timeline of Hatch - Waxman and Biosimilars litigation, and summaries of some of the related decisions issued by the U.S. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the year 2017.

The Federal Court of Appeal recently released its much - anticipated decision in Bozzer v.