Sentences with phrase «recently heard an appeal»

A Florida court recently heard an appeal in a cruise ship personal injury case.

In Massachusetts, an appellate court recently heard an appeal from a defendant restaurant owner after it was determined by the lower court that the case could proceed to trial.

Our B.C. Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of a Trial Judge's decision.

For the first time in more than two decades, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently heard an appeal on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, St. Catharines family lawyer Sharon Silbert writes in The Lawyer's Daily.

For the first time in more than two decades, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently heard an appeal on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child... Read more

Not exact matches

The Illinois Supreme Court recently declined to hear the Friends» appeal of a lower court's decision allowing the Park District of La Grange to sell a 2.82 - acre piece of the park.

Recently the Chief Justice of the Federation directed Heads of all our Courts of first instance and Appeal to accelerate hearings of corruption cases and dismiss any judicial officers found to have been compromised.

Democrat Roger Corbin, 70, of Westbury, surrendered after the state's highest court recently declined to hear his appeal.

Many people first heard of the «Wish I Was Here» project when Braff, one - time star of the TV show «Scrubs,» more recently on - stage in the adaptation of «Bullets Over Broadway,» sent out an appeal via the crowdfunding website Kickstarter for financing, setting off a predictable cycle of backlash.

Federal appeals court judges recently heard a challenge to the Obama EPA's approval of E15, a blend of 85 percent gasoline and 15 percent ethanol, to be -LSB-...]

(On the injunction issue, the Prothonotary's recent written directions as to scheduling and hearing Abbott's motion for a post trial injunction in May 2014 were recently «converted» to an Order and appealed by Janssen to be heard by Justice Hughes.)

Green v. Law Society of Manitoba, dismissed at first instance by the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, was recently heard by the Manitoba Court of Appeal.

More recently, the Patent Appeal Board, the internal tribunal that hears appeals from patent examiners at the Canadian Patent Office, considered the patentability of Alice Corporation's patent application relating multi party risk management contracts.

He has been involved in more than 40 insurance - related appeals, including recently successfully arguing the first Hurricane Sandy - related insurance coverage case heard by the New Jersey Supreme Court and a case in the First Circuit establishing the law on critical issues of liability insurance coverage.

Recently, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench (per Justice R. Paul Belzil) granted Unifor, Local 707A (the Union) an interim injunction prohibiting Suncor Energy Inc (Suncor) from implementing its random drug and alcohol testing policy pending either a successful application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada or, failing that, the parties holding a fresh arbitration hearing in early 2018.

The appeal of that matter was heard recently, and the original decision was confirmed.

The SCC has been recently active in this area having heard on January 21, 2015 the appeal Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area # 23 v. Attorney General of the Yukon Territory SCC No. 35823 (Charter s. 23) and having released in 2013 its decision Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie ‑ Britannique v. British Columbia, 2013 SCC 42 (language of exhibits).

In a case that was heard by the Ontario Court of Appeal recently, a simple visit by a 12 - year old girl to come see her father in Canada came to a dramatic head, and sparked a custody dispute that had repercussions relating to allegations of abuse, determination of immigration status, and protection of the girl's constitutional rights.

The Ontario Court of Appeal granted leave recently to hear an appeal of Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Ontario, a judicial review by the Ontario Superior Court holding that private product label regulations in s. 12.02 of Ontario Regulation 201/96 to the Ontario Drug Benefit Act («ODBA») and s. 9 of Ontario Regulation 935 of the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act («DIDFA») were ultra vires and of no force and eAppeal granted leave recently to hear an appeal of Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Ontario, a judicial review by the Ontario Superior Court holding that private product label regulations in s. 12.02 of Ontario Regulation 201/96 to the Ontario Drug Benefit Act («ODBA») and s. 9 of Ontario Regulation 935 of the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act («DIDFA») were ultra vires and of no force and eappeal of Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Ontario, a judicial review by the Ontario Superior Court holding that private product label regulations in s. 12.02 of Ontario Regulation 201/96 to the Ontario Drug Benefit Act («ODBA») and s. 9 of Ontario Regulation 935 of the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act («DIDFA») were ultra vires and of no force and effect.

In Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that a court has jurisdiction to hear claims of tort / breach of contract unless an action is instituted to «circumvent» the internal procedures of universities or colleges.

It was heard recently in the Ontario Court of Appeal.