d) the judgment was obtained by fraud in connection with a matter
of procedure; e)
recognition or enforcement would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy
of the requested State, including
situations where the specific proceedings leading to the judgment were incompatible with fundamental principles
of procedural fairness
of that State; f) the judgment is inconsistent with a judgment
given in the requested State in a dispute between the same parties; or g) the judgment is inconsistent with an earlier judgment
given in another State between the same parties on the same cause
of action, provided that the earlier judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its
recognition in the requested State.