People scare atheists, yet they refuse to
recognize human sin (instead blaming all evils on «religion»).
Not exact matches
Afterward, many conservatives realized they could show compassion in
recognizing the
human side and could support the antidiscrimination ordinance without compromising their theological position (viz., that the Bible condemns homosexuality as
sin from which persons need to be redeemed).
>
Recognizing some
sins (as you say, murder) as worse (more damaging to oneself and others) than say, falling > off your diet, is not something one «loves» to «pick» as you say; but it does apply a measure of
human ability and > accountability.
This Marxist proposal is too optimistic concerning
human nature, for it fails to
recognize the problem of
sin as pride.
Even religions which teach that
humans are basically good still
recognize that we occassionally
sin, and something must be done about this
sin.
It is just as important for Christians to be discriminating in their judgments, as for them to
recognize the element of
sin in all
human endeavors.
But it is, I have said, the chief instrumentality since it is the place where he is explicitly acknowledged as Lord, his purpose as sent from God
recognized and accepted, even if not always (and this is our
human sin) implemented in every respect.
Furthermore, while we need to
recognize the gravity of our
human propensity to
sin, we need to balance this with the recognition (demonstrated so vividly by Jesus of Nazareth) that each and every
human being has the ability to turn to God and to do good, that each and every
human being is intrinsically worthy of love.
These movements were criticized in the further development of theology for their naive identification of Christianity with a social programme and their failure to
recognize the limits set by
sin to any
human accomplishment.