If we further analyze the problem, it is possible to see that the underlying logic — specifically the ability to
recognize logical fallacies, is very often one source of problems in critical thinking.
Any citing by climate zealots of the opinions of supposed experts should be met by a referral to the «experts» who confined Galileo to home imprisonment, and the reminder that «appeal to authority» is
a recognized logical fallacy.
Not exact matches
«I want them to think through what they read online, to apply all the skills they learned in the class — evaluating source credibility, identifying
logical fallacies,
recognizing bias, basing written arguments on solid evidence — to social media platforms just as much as they do in their academic work.»
Dude, scholarly monks int eh dark ages
recognized that as a
logical fallacy.