But most importantly we are able to reason and develop morals by which
we recognize right and wrong.
Of a somewhat different nature are considerations of our ethical and aesthetic senses, of the fact that we can
recognize right and wrong and perceive beauty.
Rather, we are referring here to our moral or ethical sense: our ability to
recognize right and wrong, justice and injustice, even when inequity is socially acceptable and injustice is inherent in the existing structures.
We can
recognize right and wrong, and we recognize that it is altogether independent of whatever may happen to be majority opinion at any given time or place.
Not exact matches
Otherwise you're likely to seek out the
wrong people
and fail to
recognize the
right ones when you meet them.
The more I learned about the real Marcia Clark, not the two dimensional cardboard cutout I saw in the news, but the complicated, whip - smart giant - hearted mother of two, who woke up every day, put both feet on the floor
and dedicated herself to
righting an unconciscable
wrong, the loss of two innocents Ron Goldman
and Nicole Brown, the more I had to
recognize that I, along with the rest of the world, had been superficial
and careless in my judgment,
and I'm here today to tell you I'm sorry,» Paulson said to Clark while onstage.
We clearly
recognize that, regardless of how they are allegedly posthumously judged, young children
and those adults with various mental diseases / defects lack the capacity to tell
right from
wrong, i.e. the deity who allegedly wrote a moral code on their hearts failed miserably.
And then I recognized that my academic language of distancing analysis and explanation also served to obfuscate the clear moral dimensions of life and the need to choose between right and wrong, and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusi
And then I
recognized that my academic language of distancing analysis
and explanation also served to obfuscate the clear moral dimensions of life and the need to choose between right and wrong, and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusi
and explanation also served to obfuscate the clear moral dimensions of life
and the need to choose between right and wrong, and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusi
and the need to choose between
right and wrong, and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusi
and wrong,
and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusi
and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusion.
In fact, they still feel JoePa was
wronged and refuse to
recognize that had he done the
right thing
and gone to police, some of those children would never have been victimized in the first place.
And the generational curses are dealt with through recognizing them as participation with sin, taking responsibility for that participation, repentance, making things right with those wronged wherever possible, and casting them out, if need be, all through faith in Yahsh
And the generational curses are dealt with through
recognizing them as participation with sin, taking responsibility for that participation, repentance, making things
right with those
wronged wherever possible,
and casting them out, if need be, all through faith in Yahsh
and casting them out, if need be, all through faith in Yahshua.
There are over 250
recognized Sects of Protestant Christianity alone,
and each is convinced they are the only ones who are
right,
and all the others, while their hearts are in the
right place, are
wrong.
I'm sure there are plenty of Christians who would
recognize Gov. Brewers decision as the
right choice
and the bill passed by the Arizona Senate as being
wrong.
Certainly we must
recognize the importance of the attempt to keep the moral sense alive even in war, but this method which seeks to distinguish always between a «
right»
and a «
wrong» tends toward the subtle hypocrisy of self - justification.
Many Christians see Cod as the guardian of the moral law, but some thinkers
recognize the autonomy of morals
and hold that people can discern what is
right and wrong independently of their basic beliefs about the universe.
Those propounding this idea of «conscience» urge us to
recognize three things: that the spiritual
and moral life is a journey; that when the Church teaches that some things are just
wrong and no combination of intentions
and consequences can make them
right, the Church is proposing an «ideal» to which the most «generous» response may not always be possible;
and that confessors
and spiritual directors should be compassionate
and discerning guides along the often rocky pathways of the moral life.
While I wont go into a rant, try thinking for once
and recognize that if me, this young
and the countless millions are
wrong, then does that make, «Al Quaeda, The Westboro Baptist Church, Rev Jermiah Wright, Tikkun, Rev Hagee, etc,
right?
While Lewis is still a force on defense, his best contribution is
recognizing formations
and calling out the scheme,
and many times, the actual play the opposing offense may be running
and is more often
right than
wrong.
Most recently, Jennifer has focused her energies on helping individuals
recognize their power as consumers
and citizens to
right wrongs in the media
and beyond.
«
Right or
wrong, I think they've fallen into the same problem as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [PETA]
and Greenpeace at different parts in their histories as being too extreme to
recognize individual needs,» she said.
Instead of viewing the left
and the
right as either inherently correct or
wrong, a more scientific approach is to
recognize that liberals
and conservatives emphasize different moral values.
I mean, I think it's better to not get rid of that Gucci summer dress for the reason that you wore it too many times already —
and people start
recognizing you as the girl with the Gucci dress — or your favorite leather biker jacket that is not really on - trend
right now, but you know will NEVER go out of fashion, or those pointy heels... I think we all thought those were DONE a few seasons back, but then Balenciaga proved us
wrong!
'' [Students] need to
recognize that every situation has a
right and wrong way of dealing with it,» adds Lake.
During the weekend, I reflect on the previous week
and think about what went
right, what went
wrong and what possible adjustments I might need to make to cut down or
recognize the «
wrongs» sooner.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable
and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe
rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours
and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA
and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the
right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly
wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we
recognize is??
We must use Copenhagen to rise above the petty politics of climate change, to instead
recognize it as a clearly moral issue, with a clear choice between what is
right and what is morally
wrong.
Understanding the broader context in which Indigenous
rights emerge is not «to attempt the redress of past
wrongs,» but rather an attempt to
recognize the realities of our history,
and the consequences that result from it.
A mentally competent person
recognizes right from
wrong, is well - oriented,
and is able to stand trial or to serve as a witness.
They don't start with the basic cross-selling of their own capabilities to their colleagues, they don't focus on providing real value to their clients (because a lot of it would involve the investment of non-billable time that the firm doesn't
recognize, even if it pays off exponentially later),
and they don't analyze what they do
right (
and what the they do
wrong!)
Harassment, as a civil
wrong, had developed within the administrative structure of human
rights tribunals
and grievance processes under collective agreements but there was no generally
recognized common law «tort» of harassment.
The Court limited its decision to trade secrets, noting most countries
recognize the underlying intellectual property
rights at issue
and would view the selling of the pirated products as a legal
wrong.
In that debate, Republican Sen. Robert Taft Jr. said in support of the proposal, «I feel that our society today has come to
recognize, on a far broader basis than ever before, the desirability
and necessity of providing adequate legal remedies to all our citizens for
wrongs, real or imagined, for the full exercise of
rights they have under the law;
and I think the bill goes a long way in that direction.»